Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

12/3/2020
10:00 AM
Connect Directly
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail vvv
50%
50%

From FUD to Fix: Why the CISO-Vendor Partnership Needs to Change Now

CISOs and their staffs are up against too many systems, screens, and alerts, with too few solutions to effectively address pain points.

Memo to cybersecurity vendors: Enough already with the fear, uncertainty, and doubt (FUD) scenarios, followed by your "magic-bullet" solutions and sales pitches. CISOs' plates were full enough before the pandemic. Today, they are operating on perpetual overload, and they need real and immediate responses to their problems.

Why? Because they are much savvier about the modern nature of attacks and they now assume that they can and will get breached (or just as likely, already have been breached). So, they don't have time for FUD fog from dozens of vendors, each with a single-purpose solution to hawk. They realize that the cost and complexities of acquiring and implementing these tools cannot be sustained.

Related Content:

Cybersecurity Spending Hits 'Temporary Pause' Amid Pandemic

The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence

New on The Edge: 5 Signs Someone Might be Taking Advantage of Your Security Goodness

How could they? There are too many systems. Too many screens. Too many unmanaged devices with more on the way, thanks to embedded systems, BYOD, and the Internet of Things. There's too much information for beleaguered analysts to deal with as they struggle to assemble the "story" behind every single incident.

Then, there are the alerts — more than 10,000 a day for most security professionals, with roughly 80% of survey respondents stating that on average it takes about 10 minutes to investigate each alert, and nearly half suggesting a false-positive return of 50% or higher. All of this results in a simple yet foreboding reality: Bad "things" get missed. Analysts simply cannot get to everything.

CISOs understand that it isn't always possible to monitor every app, user, and endpoint. But they recognize that it is critical to have tools in place that enable their teams to identify where threats exist, so they block and/or remove them in real time, while minimizing impact.

This means vendors need to change their tune — now — if they want to be valued as true partners by CISOs who are still receiving the go-ahead for spending on cyber projects despite these challenges. Four out of five organizations will see their cybersecurity investment increase this year. Overall, the global cybersecurity market is forecast to exceed $326 billion by 2027, up from $167 billion today.

The upshot is there are still opportunities for vendors to deliver lasting, positive value, but CISOs are going to evaluate and choose more wisely. To deliver real fixes instead of dwelling upon FUD, vendors must incorporate the following into their partnership playbook.

Empower CISOs With Actionable Data
Hundreds of vendors pound on the door of CISOs with point solutions. But point solutions cannot take organizations to the next level of threat defense. Instead of constantly getting outpaced by the variety, speed, and sophistication of attacks, security teams will get ahead with tools that deliver durable, customizable, real-time contextual insights to find incidents quickly, and hunt for undiscovered attackers. They also thrive when these tools can provide actionable evidence of new threats as they are discovered, and allow that evidence to be incorporated into their other analytic tools, improving team members' capabilities as the landscape continues to shift.

Don't Hold Customers Ransom — Open Up to Open Source
Siloed, single-purpose proprietary products put CISOs in a box. The solutions do what they do but often make it hard for security analysts to see how or why an alert was generated. They normally don't offer access to the underlying data, which can be critical to understanding context. Open source communities are about building toward something better, sharing knowledge to expand upon an already-rich repository of resources.

By bringing security professionals together so they solve the problems that CISOs are seeing every day, open source validates the timeless adage that the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. By incorporating open source projects into their solutions, and contributing to those projects, vendors add significant value for their customers and can use their knowledge to be a true partner that will provide actionable data for analysis, forensics, and real-time response.

Be Transparent and Available
Ultimately, it's all about the customer, right? Yet CISOs frequently encounter interoperability issues as they attempt to swiftly deploy or replace solutions. Vendors must take a proactive role in transparently collaborating with other vendors to quickly resolve interoperability obstacles. They also bear the responsibility of ensuring that customers can easily and seamlessly integrate new technologies into their security stack while being available to them in case any issues arise. It is critical that CISOs see early value in their investments instead of headaches.

If organizations settle for vendors that rely on FUD to sell more point solutions, they will find themselves falling behind. CISOs shouldn't be satisfied by settling; they should insist on products and services from customer-first vendors that incorporate real-time data with community-generated insights. They must demand nothing less than productive partnerships that will stand up to whatever the adversary comes up with today ... and tomorrow.

Over a 35-year career in the Silicon Valley, MB served as CEO and director of multiple private and public companies, including Imperva and Coverity, creating more than $3 billion of shareholder value. In 2005, she received the Ernst & Young Entrepreneur of the Year award for ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
News
Former CISA Director Chris Krebs Discusses Risk Management & Threat Intel
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  2/23/2021
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
Security + Fraud Protection: Your One-Two Punch Against Cyberattacks
Joshua Goldfarb, Director of Product Management at F5,  2/23/2021
News
Cybercrime Groups More Prolific, Focus on Healthcare in 2020
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  2/22/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Building the SOC of the Future
Building the SOC of the Future
Digital transformation, cloud-focused attacks, and a worldwide pandemic. The past year has changed the way business works and the way security teams operate. There is no going back.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-27670
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-25
Appspace 6.2.4 allows SSRF via the api/v1/core/proxy/jsonprequest url parameter.
CVE-2021-27671
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-25
An issue was discovered in the comrak crate before 0.9.1 for Rust. XSS can occur because the protection mechanism for data: and javascript: URIs is case-sensitive, allowing (for example) Data: to be used in an attack.
CVE-2020-9051
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-24
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none.
CVE-2020-9052
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-24
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none.
CVE-2020-9053
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-24
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none.