Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

6/11/2019
07:30 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Cross-Site Scripting Errors Continue to Be Most Common Web App Flaw

In vulnerability disclosure programs, organizations are paying more in total for XSS issues than any other vulnerability type, HackerOne says.

Cross-site scripting (XSS) errors that allow attackers to inject malicious code into otherwise benign websites continue to be the most common web application vulnerability across organizations.

Bug bounty firm HackerOne recently analyzed data on more than 120,000 security vulnerabilities reported to organizations through the end of 2018 by the hacker community via public and private bug bounty programs. HackerOne's customers classified the vulnerabilities and ranked the top 10 of them by impact, severity, and weakness type.

The analysis showed XSS to be the most common issue for most organizations, even though the threat is often downplayed because it does not always lead to large-scale information breaches," says Miju Han, director of program management at HackerOne.

"Our data tells a different story because companies pay out for XSS far more than they do for any other vulnerability class," Han says. In fact, of the $55 million that bug hunters in HackerOne's program have earned so far in total, some $8 million has been from reporting XSS vulnerabilities alone, she says. "XSS is important for companies to guard against. XSS is here to stay,"

HackerOne's vulnerability analysis revealed other trends as well. The growing adoption of hybrid and multicloud environments, for instance, is putting organizations at increased risk from vulnerabilities such as server-side request forgery (SSRF). These are flaws that allow attackers to read, update, and modify internal resources and connect to services such as HTTP-enabled databases. Much of the exposure is the result of organizations that previously didn't store data online now going all-in on cloud technologies without knowing how to protect their data first.

Information disclosure weaknesses in an application, such as a broken or missing control, are another category of security vulnerabilities that organizations are increasingly becoming exposed to as they adopt cloud environments.

HackerOne's analysis showed that the security vulnerabilities that organizations are willing to pay the most for — on a per vulnerability disclosure basis — include SSRF, privilege escalation flaws, and insecure direct object reference (IDOR) issues that allow attackers to bypass authorization and access control measures.

Such flaws are not as commonly reported as XSS flaws. However, many companies actively give incentives to hackers to search for them because of the risk they pose, according to HackerOne's report summarizing its findings. Other low-volume but high-impact web application security flaws for which organizations are willing to pay more include business logic errors and code injection errors.

Interestingly, only four of the vulnerabilities in HackerOne's top 10 list are also on OWASP's top 10 list — a resource that many organizations use to identify top risks. The overlapping flaws including XSS, information disclosure, and code injection errors. But some security vulnerabilities, like XML external entities (XXE) flaws, which ranks fourth in OWASP's Top 10, are nowhere to be found on the HackerOne list.

The reason for the difference is that HackerOne's list represents real-world security risks and not just vulnerabilities ranked by volume, Han says.

"Companies are awarding bounties for these vulnerabilities because they could actually have substantial impact on their businesses," she notes. "Our data tells the story of which attack vectors hackers are most likely to employ and then which attack vectors are the most valuable to companies."

Related Content:

Jai Vijayan is a seasoned technology reporter with over 20 years of experience in IT trade journalism. He was most recently a Senior Editor at Computerworld, where he covered information security and data privacy issues for the publication. Over the course of his 20-year ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Data Privacy Protections for the Most Vulnerable -- Children
Dimitri Sirota, Founder & CEO of BigID,  10/17/2019
Sodinokibi Ransomware: Where Attackers' Money Goes
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  10/15/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
7 Threats & Disruptive Forces Changing the Face of Cybersecurity
This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at the biggest emerging threats and disruptive forces that are changing the face of cybersecurity today.
Flash Poll
2019 Online Malware and Threats
2019 Online Malware and Threats
As cyberattacks become more frequent and more sophisticated, enterprise security teams are under unprecedented pressure to respond. Is your organization ready?
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-18214
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-19
The Video_Converter app 0.1.0 for Nextcloud allows denial of service (CPU and memory consumption) via multiple concurrent conversions because many FFmpeg processes may be running at once. (The workload is not queued for serial execution.)
CVE-2019-18202
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-19
Information Disclosure is possible on WAGO Series PFC100 and PFC200 devices before FW12 due to improper access control. A remote attacker can check for the existence of paths and file names via crafted HTTP requests.
CVE-2019-18209
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-19
templates/pad.html in Etherpad-Lite 1.7.5 has XSS when the browser does not encode the path of the URL, as demonstrated by Internet Explorer.
CVE-2019-18198
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-18
In the Linux kernel before 5.3.4, a reference count usage error in the fib6_rule_suppress() function in the fib6 suppression feature of net/ipv6/fib6_rules.c, when handling the FIB_LOOKUP_NOREF flag, can be exploited by a local attacker to corrupt memory, aka CID-ca7a03c41753.
CVE-2019-18197
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-18
In xsltCopyText in transform.c in libxslt 1.1.33, a pointer variable isn't reset under certain circumstances. If the relevant memory area happened to be freed and reused in a certain way, a bounds check could fail and memory outside a buffer could be written to, or uninitialized data could be disclo...