Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

10/1/2019
05:10 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
Google+
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Cisco Webex & Zoom Bug Lets Attackers Spy on Conference Calls

The "Prying-Eye" vulnerability could let intruders scan for unprotected meeting IDs and snoop on conference calls.

Researchers have discovered a vulnerability in the Zoom and Cisco Webex conference platforms that could let an attacker scan for and drop into video meetings unprotected with a password.

The "Prying-Eye" vulnerability was discovered in July by researchers with the CQ Prime Threat Research Team, a division of application security startup Cequence. Cisco and Zoom were immediately notified of the flaw, and both companies have issued patches for their systems.

An adversary could exploit Prying-Eye to launch an enumeration attack, which leverages automation to detect numeric or alphanumeric sequences that are used as identifiers for public-facing applications. CQ Prime analysts targeted the web conferencing APIs with a bot designed to scan and discover valid numeric meeting IDs for Webex and Zoom calls. If the meeting isn't protected with a password or other authentication, the attacker could drop in.

When the bot cycles through the sequences to find a valid ID, it comes back and determines whether the ID is valid and whether it requires a password, says Shreyans Mehta, co-founder and CTO of Cequence and leader of this research. An attacker could respond back and view or listen to an active meeting, and could also use this tactic to determine the IDs of future calls.

That's not all the attacker could discover, Mehta points out. "Once you identify an unprotected meeting ID, you can get more information about that meeting host and you can get information about who owns the meeting identifier," he explains. Depending on the target, the attacker could gain access to the meeting host's name or email address in addition to information about the meeting.

It is worth noting the intruder may be noticed, as callers are announced when they join meetings. There is no indication this vulnerability has been exploited on either Webex or Zoom platforms.

When Cisco learned an attacker could abuse Webex API calls to enumerate meeting numbers, it created a fix and issued an advisory to warn users of the bug. It advises admins keep the default configuration, which requires the use of a password when a meeting is created. Webex offers a randomly generated password by default in the meeting setup process for sites that don't mandate password protection; however, users can replace this password with their own or disable password protection if the site allows.

Zoom is releasing new controls for its meeting and webinar password settings. Before today's update, users could enable passwords on a meeting-by-meeting basis; this change adds new settings at the account, group, and user level. Passwords can now be required for scheduling new meetings, setting up instant meetings, and for personal meeting ID (PMI). The additional settings are meant to give account owners and admins more control over meeting passwords.

New password settings were enabled by default for accounts without Zoom Rooms on September 29. They will be enabled by default for accounts with Zoom Rooms on November 23. This change will not affect users who join calls by clicking a meeting link or through desktop calendar integration.

The idea behind this research was not only to highlight the vulnerability in Cisco and Webex but to draw attention to the danger of enumeration attacks and how they can target APIs, says Mehta. Many of the applications in use today tie web forms or mobile devices to back-end systems. In addition to unauthorized access, an enumeration attack could be used as an application distributed denial-of-service attack and cycle ongoing requests until the application shuts down, driving up infrastructure cost.

Related Content:

Check out The Edge, Dark Reading's new section for features, threat data, and in-depth perspectives. Today's top story: "5 Disruptive Trends Transforming Cybersecurity."

Kelly Sheridan is the Staff Editor at Dark Reading, where she focuses on cybersecurity news and analysis. She is a business technology journalist who previously reported for InformationWeek, where she covered Microsoft, and Insurance & Technology, where she covered financial ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
DevSecOps: The Answer to the Cloud Security Skills Gap
Lamont Orange, Chief Information Security Officer at Netskope,  11/15/2019
Attackers' Costs Increasing as Businesses Focus on Security
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  11/15/2019
TPM-Fail: What It Means & What to Do About It
Ari Singer, CTO at TrustPhi,  11/19/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: -when I told you that our cyber-defense was from another age
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-18858
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-20
CODESYS 3 web server before 3.5.15.20, as distributed with CODESYS Control runtime systems, has a Buffer Overflow.
CVE-2019-3466
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-20
The pg_ctlcluster script in postgresql-common in versions prior to 210 didn't drop privileges when creating socket/statistics temporary directories, which could result in local privilege escalation.
CVE-2010-4659
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-20
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in statusnet through 2010 in error message contents.
CVE-2019-4530
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-20
IBM Maximo Asset Management 7.6, 7.6.1, and 7.6.1.1 could allow an authenticated user to delete a record that they should not normally be able to. IBM X-Force ID: 165586.
CVE-2019-4561
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-20
IBM Security Identity Manager 6.0.0 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on the system, caused by the deserialization of untrusted data. By persuading a victim to visit a specially crafted Web site, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code on the syst...