Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

10/1/2019
05:10 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
Google+
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Cisco Webex & Zoom Bug Lets Attackers Spy on Conference Calls

The "Prying-Eye" vulnerability could let intruders scan for unprotected meeting IDs and snoop on conference calls.

Researchers have discovered a vulnerability in the Zoom and Cisco Webex conference platforms that could let an attacker scan for and drop into video meetings unprotected with a password.

The "Prying-Eye" vulnerability was discovered in July by researchers with the CQ Prime Threat Research Team, a division of application security startup Cequence. Cisco and Zoom were immediately notified of the flaw, and both companies have issued patches for their systems.

An adversary could exploit Prying-Eye to launch an enumeration attack, which leverages automation to detect numeric or alphanumeric sequences that are used as identifiers for public-facing applications. CQ Prime analysts targeted the web conferencing APIs with a bot designed to scan and discover valid numeric meeting IDs for Webex and Zoom calls. If the meeting isn't protected with a password or other authentication, the attacker could drop in.

When the bot cycles through the sequences to find a valid ID, it comes back and determines whether the ID is valid and whether it requires a password, says Shreyans Mehta, co-founder and CTO of Cequence and leader of this research. An attacker could respond back and view or listen to an active meeting, and could also use this tactic to determine the IDs of future calls.

That's not all the attacker could discover, Mehta points out. "Once you identify an unprotected meeting ID, you can get more information about that meeting host and you can get information about who owns the meeting identifier," he explains. Depending on the target, the attacker could gain access to the meeting host's name or email address in addition to information about the meeting.

It is worth noting the intruder may be noticed, as callers are announced when they join meetings. There is no indication this vulnerability has been exploited on either Webex or Zoom platforms.

When Cisco learned an attacker could abuse Webex API calls to enumerate meeting numbers, it created a fix and issued an advisory to warn users of the bug. It advises admins keep the default configuration, which requires the use of a password when a meeting is created. Webex offers a randomly generated password by default in the meeting setup process for sites that don't mandate password protection; however, users can replace this password with their own or disable password protection if the site allows.

Zoom is releasing new controls for its meeting and webinar password settings. Before today's update, users could enable passwords on a meeting-by-meeting basis; this change adds new settings at the account, group, and user level. Passwords can now be required for scheduling new meetings, setting up instant meetings, and for personal meeting ID (PMI). The additional settings are meant to give account owners and admins more control over meeting passwords.

New password settings were enabled by default for accounts without Zoom Rooms on September 29. They will be enabled by default for accounts with Zoom Rooms on November 23. This change will not affect users who join calls by clicking a meeting link or through desktop calendar integration.

The idea behind this research was not only to highlight the vulnerability in Cisco and Webex but to draw attention to the danger of enumeration attacks and how they can target APIs, says Mehta. Many of the applications in use today tie web forms or mobile devices to back-end systems. In addition to unauthorized access, an enumeration attack could be used as an application distributed denial-of-service attack and cycle ongoing requests until the application shuts down, driving up infrastructure cost.

Related Content:

Check out The Edge, Dark Reading's new section for features, threat data, and in-depth perspectives. Today's top story: "5 Disruptive Trends Transforming Cybersecurity."

Kelly Sheridan is the Staff Editor at Dark Reading, where she focuses on cybersecurity news and analysis. She is a business technology journalist who previously reported for InformationWeek, where she covered Microsoft, and Insurance & Technology, where she covered financial ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Mobile Banking Malware Up 50% in First Half of 2019
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/17/2020
Active Directory Needs an Update: Here's Why
Raz Rafaeli, CEO and Co-Founder at Secret Double Octopus,  1/16/2020
New Attack Campaigns Suggest Emotet Threat Is Far From Over
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  1/16/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
The Year in Security: 2019
This Tech Digest provides a wrap up and overview of the year's top cybersecurity news stories. It was a year of new twists on old threats, with fears of another WannaCry-type worm and of a possible botnet army of Wi-Fi routers. But 2019 also underscored the risk of firmware and trusted security tools harboring dangerous holes that cybercriminals and nation-state hackers could readily abuse. Read more.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Organizations have invested in a sweeping array of security technologies to address challenges associated with the growing number of cybersecurity attacks. However, the complexity involved in managing these technologies is emerging as a major problem. Read this report to find out what your peers biggest security challenges are and the technologies they are using to address them.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-20399
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-23
A timing vulnerability in the Scalar::check_overflow function in Parity libsecp256k1-rs before 0.3.1 potentially allows an attacker to leak information via a side-channel attack.
CVE-2020-7915
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-22
An issue was discovered on Eaton 5P 850 devices. The Ubicacion SAI field allows XSS attacks by an administrator.
CVE-2019-20391
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-22
An invalid memory access flaw is present in libyang before v1.0-r3 in the function resolve_feature_value() when an if-feature statement is used inside a bit. Applications that use libyang to parse untrusted input yang files may crash.
CVE-2019-20392
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-22
An invalid memory access flaw is present in libyang before v1.0-r1 in the function resolve_feature_value() when an if-feature statement is used inside a list key node, and the feature used is not defined. Applications that use libyang to parse untrusted input yang files may crash.
CVE-2019-20393
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-22
A double-free is present in libyang before v1.0-r1 in the function yyparse() when an empty description is used. Applications that use libyang to parse untrusted input yang files may be vulnerable to this flaw, which would cause a crash or potentially code execution.