Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

10/4/2012
06:05 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Botnet Spotted Silently Scanning IPv4 Address Space For Vulnerable VoIP

Researchers use 'network telescope' to peer into Sality botnet's underground activities

A large peer-to-peer botnet known for its resilience was spotted sniffing out potential victim voice-over-IP (VoIP) servers using an advanced stealth technique of camouflaging its efforts to recruit new bots.

The Sality botnet, which was first discovered in 2003 and has been estimated to have hundreds of thousands or more infected machines in its zombie army, scanned IPv4 addresses in February 2011 via a covert scanning method that flew under the radar, according to new research from the University of California-San Diego and the University of Napoli in Italy.

The researchers were able to observe the botnet's activity via UCSD's darknet, called the UCSD Network Telescope, which provides a passive traffic-monitoring system for studying malicious Internet activity. They will present their findings at next month's Internet Measurement Conference 2012 in Boston.

Sality used some 3 million unique source IP addresses in its scan during the 12-day period the researchers observed the activity and "captured traffic reflecting a previously undocumented largescale stealth scanning behavior (across the entire IPv4 space, we believe)," the researchers wrote in their paper. The malware involved was discovered to be a module of Sality that is used for targeting session initiation protocol (SIP) servers, or VoIP systems.

The Sality malware is basically a file infector aimed at Windows machines. It has been used to spread spam, infect Web servers, steal information, and crack passwords, according to Symantec. The new research from UCSD and the University of Napoli reveals yet another use for the botnet: identifying targets for VoIP abuse, including toll fraud or vishing attacks.

"They were probably trying to brute-force SIP servers to create accounts to be used for free calls, anonymous calls, VoIP fraud, etc.," says UCSD's Alberto Dainotti, who, along with fellow UCSD researchers Alistair King and Kimberly Claffy and University of Napoli Federico II's Ferdinando Papale and Antonio Pescape, conducted the Sality research and authored the report (PDF).

But even more compelling is the way the botnet tried to hide its recruitment efforts, using "reverse-byte order scanning," which results in a low number of packets per day, for instance. And 1 million of the around 3 million IPs the researchers watched in the scanning activity transmitted only one probe and then dropped out of the scanning activity -- yet another method of laying low.

"The choice of the target IP addresses progresses in reverse-byte-order increments. Moreover, there is a large turnover of bots participating in the scan. The result is that a single network would receive scanning packets 'diluted' over a large period of time -- 12 days in this case -- coming from different sources," UCSD's King says. "This traffic would be very difficult to spot by an intrusion detection system, [for example], because of very low volume and almost each packet coming from a different source IP," he says.

It's not that this stealth-scanning technique is unique, but it's the first time such an event has been both empirically observed and documented, Dainotti says. "Some experts believe this behavior has been adopted by other botnets. However, we are not aware of any data confirming any event similar to this one."

David Piscitello, senior security technologist for ICANN, says this indeed appears to be the first time researchers have identified a botnet that employs this scanning method using reverse-byte sequential increments of target IP addresses. "The botnet employs sophisticated 'orchestration' techniques to avoid detection," Piscitello says. "Simply put, the botnet operator divvied up the scans across nearly 3 million bots to scan the full IPv4 address space using a scanning pattern that maximizes coverage and overlap, but is unlikely to be detected by current automation."

[ Notorious 3322.org domain operator has agreed to cooperate with Microsoft and Chinese Computer Emergency Response Team to block malicious traffic and malware in the domain. See Microsoft Hands Off Nitol Botnet Sinkhole Operation To Chinese CERT. ]

Sality historically hasn't attracted the attention that other botnets have. But according to Symantec, its anti-security software features and advanced method of spreading its payload have made it an efficient and resilient botnet. "Despite being one of the most prevalent threats nowadays, Sality has not received the coverage or attention required to raise awareness and eventually create a momentum to seriously thwart the threat," Symantec wrote in a white paper last year on Sality.

"The malware distributed to these computers include things as 'benign' as spam generators, but also password stealers. In early 2011, one of the programs distributed was geared towards Web credentials theft, with a special emphasis on Facebook and Google Blogger accounts. Tomorrow, the operators of the botnet could decide to steal banking information," the report (PDF) warned.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Add Your Comment" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message. Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
Cloud Security Threats for 2021
Or Azarzar, CTO & Co-Founder of Lightspin,  12/3/2020
Why Vulnerable Code Is Shipped Knowingly
Chris Eng, Chief Research Officer, Veracode,  11/30/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Assessing Cybersecurity Risk in Todays Enterprises
Assessing Cybersecurity Risk in Todays Enterprises
COVID-19 has created a new IT paradigm in the enterprise and a new level of cybersecurity risk. This report offers a look at how enterprises are assessing and managing cyber-risk under the new normal.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-29572
PUBLISHED: 2020-12-06
app/View/Elements/genericElements/SingleViews/Fields/genericField.ctp in MISP 2.4.135 has XSS via the authkey comment field.
CVE-2020-29573
PUBLISHED: 2020-12-06
sysdeps/i386/ldbl2mpn.c in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) before 2.23 on x86 targets has a stack-based buffer overflow if the input to any of the printf family of functions is an 80-bit long double with a non-canonical bit pattern, as seen when passing a \x00\x04\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\...
CVE-2020-27772
PUBLISHED: 2020-12-04
A flaw was found in ImageMagick in coders/bmp.c. An attacker who submits a crafted file that is processed by ImageMagick could trigger undefined behavior in the form of values outside the range of type `unsigned int`. This would most likely lead to an impact to application availability, but could po...
CVE-2020-27773
PUBLISHED: 2020-12-04
A flaw was found in ImageMagick in MagickCore/gem-private.h. An attacker who submits a crafted file that is processed by ImageMagick could trigger undefined behavior in the form of values outside the range of type `unsigned char` or division by zero. This would most likely lead to an impact to appli...
CVE-2020-28950
PUBLISHED: 2020-12-04
The installer of Kaspersky Anti-Ransomware Tool (KART) prior to KART 4.0 Patch C was vulnerable to a DLL hijacking attack that allowed an attacker to elevate privileges during installation process.