Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

4/8/2016
11:30 AM
Bob Hansmann
Bob Hansmann
Commentary
100%
0%

7 Profiles Of Highly Risky Insiders

To understand who these insiders are and why they pose a risk, start by looking at the root of the problem.

There are plenty of articles with scary numbers about the size and scope of the Insider Threat. This isn’t one of them – you already know it’s a huge concern and that few organizations maintain a reasonable level of control over it. So where do you get started? By looking at the root of the problem to understand who these insiders are, and why they pose a risk.

You may be tempted to match these insiders to specific jobs or roles. But it’s best to resist such an impulse, because insider traits emerge throughout an organization, regardless of a threat’s position. To lend clarity, here are seven profiles of common high-risk insiders.

Convenience Seekers like to ignore protocol. The "official" way to do things is too long, difficult, or complicated. Or they may prefer their own methods, such as opting for their preferred file-sharing service instead of a corporate one. They’ll also frequently use personal email to get around performance or attachment size limitations.

Accidental Victims make mistakes, perhaps because of a lack of training (or learning) of proper processes and systems. Accidental Victims will hit the wrong button, send a document to the wrong "Bob" or otherwise make an honest mistake. Most likely, our Accidental Victims are tired, stressed or distracted when they do these things. They’re especially vulnerable because external threats often "create" fear and panic as part of a phishing scheme or phone scam, so their targets won’t realize that they’re being set up.

Know-It-Alls want to "contribute," "show value," and be visible whenever possible. Unfortunately, they may over-share information in an email response. They might respond to a request when someone more qualified should. Or they could initiate communications about topics with less than the required tact or subtlety. They’ll post on social media before they think about sensitive topics such as unannounced quarterly results. Some Know-It-Alls will intentionally seek to steal or manipulate sensitive information for fun, out of curiosity – or to prove they can.

Untouchables do not believe that any of the "scary stories" could happen to them. They’ve earned privileged access, and they’re copping a cavalier attitude about it. IT personnel may constantly take advantage of their super-user credentials out of convenience, for example, only to cause malware infection of a mission-critical server when they open a highly targeted phishing email. Auditors, financial execs, developers, and others with privileges could retain too much information locally, then lose their laptop, or leave it out in the open for a thief to swipe.

Entitled Ones are convinced that they have a right to certain types of data, or to do things their own way. They ignore process or policy. They’ve concluded that they "own" data, including customer lists, source codes, scientific research, and process documentation/templates. And while we normally associate the C-suite with those who do not feel the rules apply to them, anyone can develop this attitude at any level of the company.

Traitors are malicious employees. Sometimes, they’re hatching a plot at the time of being hired. More often, however, they harbor good intentions on the first day of work, but lose their moral compass after falling into debt or growing disgruntled over a lack of upward mobility and/or a salary increase. Or they internalize destructive discontent due to differences with colleagues, bosses, or the organization itself.

Secret Insiders aren’t supposed to be inside at all. But that’s where they are, having effectively executed the first stage of an external attack: gaining a foothold inside the network. (While we’ve focused on "defenses" against such attacks for the last few decades, the reality is that a breach will be successful at some point.) At this stage, Secret Insiders have network access, and security requires that measures be in place to "detect" such a breach. But, unlike the six aforementioned high risk profiles, they are professional hackers. They’re motivated, knowledgeable – and now command all of the access and privileges of an insider.

For better or worse, security options have evolved from early login IDs/passwords, firewalls, and desktop anti-virus (AV) products to dozens of solutions that work in concert to protect the network, users, and data. An Insider Threat program will implement many of these, such as access controls and data loss prevention (DLP) tools, along with well-defined (and enforced) processes and newer technologies, like User Behavior Analytics (UBA).  

Bottom line: user education is not new. But it is frequently overlooked as a potential solution due to mindsets developed when most of us didn’t know how to change the clocks on our VCRs, and never bothered to learn. (Congratulations if you did not need to Google "VCR" to understand that sentence). Yet, today’s employees were raised with Nintendo, the Internet, and smartphones. They take pride in knowing about the latest apps, and every feature of their mobile devices. This means organizations can appeal to this generation’s "tech pride," educating them about how recommended "professional habits" can elevate them to positions of trust.

In other words, users are more capable of recognizing risks – and the value of preventative measures and processes – if we simply involve them. 

Related Content:

 

Gain insight into the latest threats and emerging best practices for managing them. Attend the Security Track at Interop Las Vegas, May 2-6. Register now!

Bob Hansmann is director of security technologies at Forcepoint. Over his more than 30 year security career, Mr. Hansmann has been responsible for monitoring the trends and directions of malware and the security industry as well as the utility and risks of emerging ... View Full Bio
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Joe Stanganelli
50%
50%
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Ninja
4/11/2016 | 3:05:34 PM
Well, that about covers it.
So, pretty much everyone then, yes?  ;)
7 Truths About BEC Scams
Ericka Chickowski, Contributing Writer,  6/13/2019
DNS Firewalls Could Prevent Billions in Losses to Cybercrime
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  6/13/2019
Can Your Patching Strategy Keep Up with the Demands of Open Source?
Tim Mackey, Principal Security Strategist, CyRC, at Synopsys,  6/18/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Building and Managing an IT Security Operations Program
As cyber threats grow, many organizations are building security operations centers (SOCs) to improve their defenses. In this Tech Digest you will learn tips on how to get the most out of a SOC in your organization - and what to do if you can't afford to build one.
Flash Poll
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
Your enterprise's cyber risk may depend upon the relationship between the IT team and the security team. Heres some insight on what's working and what isn't in the data center.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-12875
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-18
Alpine Linux abuild through 3.4.0 allows an unprivileged member of the abuild group to add an untrusted package via a --keys-dir option that causes acceptance of an untrusted signing key.
CVE-2017-8335
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-18
An issue was discovered on Securifi Almond, Almond+, and Almond 2015 devices with firmware AL-R096. The device provides a user with the capability of setting name for wireless network. These values are stored by the device in NVRAM (Non-volatile RAM). It seems that the POST parameters passed in this...
CVE-2017-8336
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-18
An issue was discovered on Securifi Almond, Almond+, and Almond 2015 devices with firmware AL-R096. The device provides a user with the capability of adding new routes to the device. It seems that the POST parameters passed in this request to set up routes on the device can be set in such a way that...
CVE-2019-12874
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-18
An issue was discovered in zlib_decompress_extra in modules/demux/mkv/util.cpp in VideoLAN VLC media player 3.x through 3.0.7. The Matroska demuxer, while parsing a malformed MKV file type, has a double free.
CVE-2012-6711
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-18
A heap-based buffer overflow exists in GNU Bash before 4.3 when wide characters, not supported by the current locale set in the LC_CTYPE environment variable, are printed through the echo built-in function. A local attacker, who can provide data to print through the "echo -e" built-in func...