Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Analytics

9/25/2007
09:15 AM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

VeriSign Flexes DNS Security Muscle

Internet DNS server host upgrades its infrastructure as DNS attacks continue to hammer the Net

All might seem quiet on Internet's Domain Name Server (DNS) front since the February attack that crippled two of the Internet's 13 DNS root servers. But inside VeriSign, which maintains some of those core servers, there have been plenty of skirmishes. (See DNS Attack: Only a Warning Shot? and VeriSign Ups the DNS Ante ).

"There have been a number of attacks on the [Internet] DNS infrastructure over the last six months, but not to the extent of previous ones," says Ken Silva, chief security officer at VeriSign, which said today that it's ahead of schedule in Project Titan, its $100 million-plus DNS infrastructure security and capacity upgrade. "They haven't gone quiet just because you're not reading about them."

DNS has become a soft target for attackers because it's not easy to protect. It requires no handshake between the attacker and the victim, which means that attackers can quickly overwhelm the system -- often with a distributed denial-of-service (DDOS) attack.

"We put in some software enhancements to counter some of those threats that are specific to DNS, where certain actions can cause it to come under stress," says Silva, who didn't provide details of the latest DNS attacks.

"We've long expressed that not all of the Internet's DNS domains are as well protected as they should be against DDOS and some spoofing attacks. We think we are on track with this… and this could set the standard for [the way] this ought to be done."

VeriSign, which first revealed Project Titan in the wake of the February DNS attack, has completed its North American edge and resolution site expansion, and will open a new data center in Delaware in the first quarter of next year, Silva says. And it's about halfway finished building a new one in Switzerland -- all part of its strategy to further distribute the DNS server infrastructure for the .com and .net domains that it manages.

The company also has upped its DNS query capacity from 400 billion queries per day to about 2 trillion, and it plans to expand to support 4 trillion queries a day by 2010. Bandwidth-wise, VeriSign's servers are now 100 Gbit/s, up from 20 Gbit/s, and the plan is to go to 200 Gbit/s by the end of the decade. The company has expanded and made other enhancements to its DNS infrastructure that also help it better isolate the source of an attack, according to Silva.

Among the expanded features is "anycasting," which is the key to distributing and protecting the DNS servers. Anycasting is the streaming of DNS queries to multiple servers so they don't get lost or jam up a given server. Anycasting was what saved the Net from more serious damage in the February attack. "We've even begun anycasting some of our big bandwidth sites as well," Silva says.

Anycasting is nothing new, however. "People have been doing that for years, but nobody is doing it at the scale that [VeriSign] is doing it," says Danny McPherson, chief research officer for Arbor Networks.

And even with anycasting, it's still tough to trace an attack to its source, VeriSign's Silva says. "So we took a blended approach of global anycasting with regional anycasting for a finer-grain [detection] to find out where the traffic is coming from."

VeriSign also has built an integrated network monitoring and security response infrastructure to help it better respond to threats to the .com and .net servers. "We can now spot well in advance problems like [shrinking] disk or memory capacity or CPU overload," which can signal an attack.

But like most other threats to infrastructure, beefing up DNS security is about keeping step with the bad guys' increasingly sophisticated and stealthy capabilities, such as botnets.

"The biggest threat to DNS has nothing to do with DNS, but rather, it has to do with overall capacity. We're in a situation where the bad guys are able to accumulate almost as much bandwidth as the good guys," says David Ulevitch, CEO of OpenDNS. "Mitigation techniques such as anycast help diffuse the situation by dividing the attacker's target into many pieces, but the problem still exists. It's just been cut up."

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

  • VeriSign Inc. (Nasdaq: VRSN)
  • Arbor Networks Inc.
  • OpenDNS

    Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

    Comment  | 
    Print  | 
    More Insights
  • Comments
    Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
    News
    Inside the Ransomware Campaigns Targeting Exchange Servers
    Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  4/2/2021
    Commentary
    Beyond MITRE ATT&CK: The Case for a New Cyber Kill Chain
    Rik Turner, Principal Analyst, Infrastructure Solutions, Omdia,  3/30/2021
    Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
    White Papers
    Video
    Cartoon
    Current Issue
    2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
    We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
    Flash Poll
    How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
    How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
    Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
    Twitter Feed
    Dark Reading - Bug Report
    Bug Report
    Enterprise Vulnerabilities
    From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
    CVE-2021-3493
    PUBLISHED: 2021-04-17
    The overlayfs implementation in the linux kernel did not properly validate with respect to user namespaces the setting of file capabilities on files in an underlying file system. Due to the combination of unprivileged user namespaces along with a patch carried in the Ubuntu kernel to allow unprivile...
    CVE-2021-3492
    PUBLISHED: 2021-04-17
    Shiftfs, an out-of-tree stacking file system included in Ubuntu Linux kernels, did not properly handle faults occurring during copy_from_user() correctly. These could lead to either a double-free situation or memory not being freed at all. An attacker could use this to cause a denial of service (ker...
    CVE-2020-2509
    PUBLISHED: 2021-04-17
    A command injection vulnerability has been reported to affect QTS and QuTS hero. If exploited, this vulnerability allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands in a compromised application. We have already fixed this vulnerability in the following versions: QTS 4.5.2.1566 Build 20210202 and later Q...
    CVE-2020-36195
    PUBLISHED: 2021-04-17
    An SQL injection vulnerability has been reported to affect QNAP NAS running Multimedia Console or the Media Streaming add-on. If exploited, the vulnerability allows remote attackers to obtain application information. QNAP has already fixed this vulnerability in the following versions of Multimedia C...
    CVE-2021-29445
    PUBLISHED: 2021-04-16
    jose-node-esm-runtime is an npm package which provides a number of cryptographic functions. In versions prior to 3.11.4 the AES_CBC_HMAC_SHA2 Algorithm (A128CBC-HS256, A192CBC-HS384, A256CBC-HS512) decryption would always execute both HMAC tag verification and CBC decryption, if either failed `JWEDe...