Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Threat Intelligence

9/12/2017
01:30 PM
50%
50%

Why North Korean Actors May Be Targeting Cryptocurrencies

FireEye links North Korean cyberthieves to a recent spate of spearphishing attacks against South Korea.

North Korean cybercriminals may increasingly steal Bitcoins and other cryptocurrencies, following the sanctions imposed Monday by the United Nations Security Council over North Korea's persistent nuclear testing, according to a FireEye blog post.

The sanctions, which include capping North Korea's oil imports and banning the country's profitable textile export business, may fuel even more spearphishing attacks against South Korea's cryptocurrency exchanges and other nations' exchanges, FireEye asserts, as North Korean actors seek to fund the government's activities and the pocketbooks of the country's elite.

Last year, FireEye says it noticed North Korean actors shifting their focus from cyber espionage to crimes against traditional banks and financial institutions around the globe. That shift was likely the result of North Korean actors trying to raise funds for government's activities, according to FireEye.

But beginning in May, the security firm says it observed at least three incidents where North Korean actors targeted South Korean cryptocurrency exchanges. The cyberthieves attacked the personal email accounts of employees at the exchanges, and often used bogus tax-related messages as the lure, according to FireEye. The attacks used malware called PEACHPIT, which FireEye links to previous malware used by North Korean actors in last year's attacks against global banks and financial institutions.

Read more about the North Korean cryptocurrency attacks here.

Dark Reading's Quick Hits delivers a brief synopsis and summary of the significance of breaking news events. For more information from the original source of the news item, please follow the link provided in this article. View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Joe Stanganelli
50%
50%
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Ninja
9/18/2017 | 1:17:38 PM
Re: Sanctions
I think it says a lot about the seriousness of the global situation that China has agreed to adhere to such sanctions against its own economic interest.

Except *maybe* NoKo itself, NOBODY wants war here.
Manstar
50%
50%
Manstar,
User Rank: Apprentice
9/15/2017 | 4:57:17 AM
Re: https://192168ll.mobi/
Thank you for the article. It's time to agree on a complete cessation of attacks
REISEN1955
50%
50%
REISEN1955,
User Rank: Ninja
9/13/2017 | 9:16:08 AM
Re: Sanctions
Don't think North Korea has to 'adhere" per se --- it is the rest of the world, inclusive of China, that has to adhere to the sanctions.  NKor wants to business with friends (not enemies) so their door is open to whomeve wants to buy their jun...k, eh, stuff and pay a good bit of money for it.  
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
9/13/2017 | 8:35:00 AM
Re: Sanctions
Thanks for the timeline. I concur with your prediction. Similar to the US-China treaty to stop hacking each other. It's hard to stop an actively utilized process.
Ratteau
50%
50%
Ratteau,
User Rank: Strategist
9/13/2017 | 7:36:49 AM
Re: Sanctions
It hasn't even been 2 full days since the UNSC passed them.  Its a bit early to tell.  Prediction: they won't.
RyanSepe
0%
100%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
9/13/2017 | 7:25:51 AM
Sanctions
To the best of the UN's knowledge has North Korea been adhering to the sanctions placed on oil and textiles?
Why Cyber-Risk Is a C-Suite Issue
Marc Wilczek, Digital Strategist & CIO Advisor,  11/12/2019
DevSecOps: The Answer to the Cloud Security Skills Gap
Lamont Orange, Chief Information Security Officer at Netskope,  11/15/2019
Unreasonable Security Best Practices vs. Good Risk Management
Jack Freund, Director, Risk Science at RiskLens,  11/13/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-19040
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-17
KairosDB through 1.2.2 has XSS in view.html because of showErrorMessage in js/graph.js, as demonstrated by view.html?q= with a '"sampling":{"value":"<script>' substring.
CVE-2019-19041
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-17
An issue was discovered in Xorux Lpar2RRD 6.11 and Stor2RRD 2.61, as distributed in Xorux 2.41. They do not correctly verify the integrity of an upgrade package before processing it. As a result, official upgrade packages can be modified to inject an arbitrary Bash script that will be executed by th...
CVE-2019-19012
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-17
An integer overflow in the search_in_range function in regexec.c in Oniguruma 6.x before 6.9.4_rc2 leads to an out-of-bounds read, in which the offset of this read is under the control of an attacker. (This only affects the 32-bit compiled version). Remote attackers can cause a denial-of-service or ...
CVE-2019-19022
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-17
iTerm2 through 3.3.6 has potentially insufficient documentation about the presence of search history in com.googlecode.iterm2.plist, which might allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive information, as demonstrated by searching for the NoSyncSearchHistory string in .plist files within public Git r...
CVE-2019-19035
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-17
jhead 3.03 is affected by: heap-based buffer over-read. The impact is: Denial of service. The component is: ReadJpegSections and process_SOFn in jpgfile.c. The attack vector is: Open a specially crafted JPEG file.