Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Threat Intelligence

2/21/2017
02:55 PM
Kelly Sheridan
Kelly Sheridan
Quick Hits
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Google Shines Light On Corporate Gmail Threats

New data highlights the diversity of security threats putting corporate Gmail inboxes at risk.

New research from Google shows how different types of email attacks are more likely to land in corporate inboxes than personal ones.

Each minute, Google prevents more than 10 million unsafe emails from reaching users who could fall victim to phishing attacks or malicious attachments, report Ali Zand and Vijay Eranti of Anti-Abuse Research and Gmail Abuse at Google.

At last week's RSA Conference, Google shared data on the diversity of security threats to corporate Gmail accounts.

Spam is a common problem, for example, but malware and phishing attacks are more likely to target enterprise users. Attackers send 4.3x more malware, 6.2x more phishing emails, and 0.4x as much spam to corporate inboxes than to personal email accounts.

Cybercriminals pick their victims based on several variables: the size and type of the business, industry, and geographical location. In a landscape where no two corporate entities face the same threats, security managers must adjust their strategies to align with specific attacks.

Looking at business inboxes as a baseline, Google found attackers are 2.3x more likely to target nonprofits with malware, followed by educational institutions (2.1x), and government-related industries (1.3x). Businesses are more likely to be targeted with phishing and spam attacks.

Research also shows entertainment, IT, and housing-related companies are most frequently targeted by spam as of Q1 2017. Financial, arts, and IT-related businesses are most targeted by phishing, and targeted financial phishing has increased. Ransomware is the largest malware threat.

The company also pulled interesting data on how spam varies across geographies. India and Japan have the most spammed inboxes as of Q1 2017. The world's largest spammers -- USA, Germany, and France -- target other countries.

Google takes these types of findings and uses them to improve security across its products and services. It employs deep learning to stay ahead of spammers and prevent email abuse, and reports less than 0.1% of email in the average Gmail inbox is spam.

Check out more details on the Google blog.

Kelly Sheridan is the Staff Editor at Dark Reading, where she focuses on cybersecurity news and analysis. She is a business technology journalist who previously reported for InformationWeek, where she covered Microsoft, and Insurance & Technology, where she covered financial ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Jet Hedon
50%
50%
Jet Hedon,
User Rank: Apprentice
2/22/2017 | 4:45:34 AM
That much ?
"more than 10 million unsafe emails from reaching users" : This is such big volume. I'd like to know how they can handle that much 
s@pingidentity.com
50%
50%
[email protected],
User Rank: Apprentice
2/21/2017 | 6:51:52 PM
MFA is required security, not additional security
Very interesting data from Google and I'm glad to see new features like S/Mime for gmail. Still prefer client-side but have accepted that most users can't handle the complexity. It's upsetting to see so many still approach MFA as additional security rather than a required security. 

 
News
Former CISA Director Chris Krebs Discusses Risk Management & Threat Intel
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  2/23/2021
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
Security + Fraud Protection: Your One-Two Punch Against Cyberattacks
Joshua Goldfarb, Director of Product Management at F5,  2/23/2021
News
Cybercrime Groups More Prolific, Focus on Healthcare in 2020
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  2/22/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Building the SOC of the Future
Building the SOC of the Future
Digital transformation, cloud-focused attacks, and a worldwide pandemic. The past year has changed the way business works and the way security teams operate. There is no going back.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-20327
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-25
A specific version of the Node.js mongodb-client-encryption module does not perform correct validation of the KMS server’s certificate. This vulnerability in combination with a privileged network position active MITM attack could result in interception of traffic between the Node....
CVE-2021-20328
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-25
Specific versions of the Java driver that support client-side field level encryption (CSFLE) fail to perform correct host name verification on the KMS server’s certificate. This vulnerability in combination with a privileged network position active MITM attack could result in inte...
CVE-2020-27543
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-25
The restify-paginate package 0.0.5 for Node.js allows remote attackers to cause a Denial-of-Service by omitting the HTTP Host header. A Restify-based web service would crash with an uncaught exception.
CVE-2020-23534
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-25
A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Upgrade.php of gopeak masterlab 2.1.5, via the 'source' parameter.
CVE-2021-27330
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-25
Triconsole Datepicker Calendar <3.77 is affected by cross-site scripting (XSS) in calendar_form.php. Attackers can read authentication cookies that are still active, which can be used to perform further attacks such as reading browser history, directory listings, and file contents.