Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Threat Intelligence

7/3/2018
04:35 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
Google+
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Cryptocurrency Theft Drives 3x Increase in Money Laundering

The first half of 2018 saw more cryptocurrency theft than all of 2017 combined, driving a rise in digital money laundering as criminals elude authorities.

Cybercriminals are snatching cryptocurrency like never before, driving a rise in money laundering as they hide their digital funds and evade authorities.

The first half of 2018 saw a threefold increase in cryptocurrency theft compared with the full year of 2017, researchers state in CipherTrace's new "Cryptocurrency Anti-Money Laundering Report" for Q2 2018. Attackers launder digital currencies using a variety of tools and technologies, including mixers, chain hopping, privacy coins, and gambling sites, to name a few.

Much of the rise in theft can be attributed to "old-school" cybercriminals who used to target financial institutions with phishing attacks, ransomware, and malware to steal money and credit card information, explains Dave Jevans, CEO of cryptocurrency startup CipherTrace. Now they're finding new targets to build their illicit fortunes: cryptocurrency exchanges.

But many of the actors snatching digital money are new to cybercrime, Jevans adds.

"We're now seeing, in the last probably eight to 12 months, a real influx of new criminals that are highly technically sophisticated," he explains. There's a major difference between seasoned threat actors and those who have been dabbling in cybercrime for less than 12 months: operational security.

It isn't a question of technical prowess so much as lack of experience, Jevans continues. Cybercrime's newest threat actors can craft advanced malware designed to target cryptocurrency addresses and inject similar addresses, under their control, to receive funds. Their malware is designed to target digital funds in a way traditional malware isn't, created by people who grew up learning about virtual currencies and can exploit them in new ways.

The problems start when they secure the money. Traditional phishers and large-scale malware attackers have learned through trial and error how to conceal illegal activity online. New entrants leave tracks all over the place.

"It's clear these people really understand cryptocurrency and crypto assets really, really well," he explains. "What they don't understand is old-school operational security … they're just not sophisticated that way. Legacy folks, they definitely have better operational security. They're better at how they interface with it, how they distribute malicious code, how they manage user handles on different forums."

However, signs indicate the newest actors are smart enough to learn – and they'll be tougher to pin down once they do.

How Virtual Money Laundering Works
The first step of cryptocurrency laundering is called layering. In traditional money laundering, this would involve buying and reselling expensive goods. In the virtual world, it involves putting funds in the cryptocurrency system and moving them around with mixers or using privacy coins. The more money moves, the harder it is to trace.

Mixers, also called tumblers and foggers, accept coins from several customers and mix them together before reallocating mixed funds. They typically require a 1% to 3% fee and have advanced in recent years to better conceal the money's origin. Now, Jevans says, they keep incoming and outgoing funds completely separate on the blockchain so there's no way to link the two.

The Internet also has 100 to 200 gambling sites that serve as money-laundering tools. Thieves create accounts and transfer funds to be laundered. Some make simple bets; some withdraw funds to a new address without making bets at all. Gambling sites often don't have a "know your customer" regulation, so it's tough for law enforcement to learn where money came from.

Privacy coins like Zcash and Monero don't make up the majority of transactions – most actors prefer bitcoin – but Jevans notes many cybercriminals are adopting them to fly under the radar. However, he anticipates these coins will soon be regulated so they comply with AML regulation.

AML Regulation Crackdown
Regulators are narrowing their focus on anti-money laundering (AML) regulation as virtual currencies are exploited to support malicious activity. The 5th Annual Europol Virtual Currency Conference, which recently took place in the Netherlands, became a place of conversation around how controls will be put into place.

"Where we're seeing it going is toward more global standards," Jevans says. "Trends are definitely toward more clear regulation [that is] easier to follow."

The Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has a list of people, companies, addresses, bank accounts, and countries that are not allowed to conduct business with the US, and it plans to add cryptocurrency addresses to the list. FinCEN says money transmitters in foreign countries will be held accountable if they violate US AML regulations.

The US Secret Service is taking a closer look at privacy coins, such as Monero and Zcash, and their role in cybercrime while advising Congress to consider additional legislative action. On June 20, the Secret Service claimed to have seized over $28 million in digital currencies in its criminal investigations. Main government branches are allegedly considering new regulations.

Related Content:

 

 

 

 

Black Hat USA returns to Las Vegas with hands-on technical Trainings, cutting-edge Briefings, Arsenal open-source tool demonstrations, top-tier security solutions and service providers in the Business Hall. Click for information on the conference and to register.

Kelly Sheridan is the Staff Editor at Dark Reading, where she focuses on cybersecurity news and analysis. She is a business technology journalist who previously reported for InformationWeek, where she covered Microsoft, and Insurance & Technology, where she covered financial ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
seanmajece
50%
50%
seanmajece,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/2/2018 | 5:48:14 AM
My opinion
I've earned a lot of money because of my crypto currency. So I recommedn you to pay attention on it. 
RetiredUser
50%
50%
RetiredUser,
User Rank: Ninja
7/8/2018 | 12:15:22 AM
Theft Utilizing Cryptocurrency or Cryptocurrency Theft?
Ross Anderson, Ilia Shumailov and Mansoor Ahmed of the Cambridge University Computer Laboratory wrote a great paper titled "Making Bitcoin Legal". It discusses how "the law might actually regulate bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies so as to provide the benefits, ranging from low-cost international money transfers and decentralised resilient operation to competitive innovation, while mitigating the harms specifically the use of cryptocurrencies in extortion, money laundering and other crimes, and the difficulty that crime victims experience in getting redress." It also illustrates that the "characteristics of a payment protocol can depend much more sensitively than one might expect on the surrounding context."

Having just read that paper it called to mind while reading this article on Dark Reading the importance of clearly defining the difference between "cryptocurrency theft" and "theft utilizing cryptocurrency". This speaks to the "surrounding context" noted in the Cambridge paper. The reason drawing this distinction is important is that the value of and the long-term stability of cryptocurrency "may" depend on percentages of coin that are considered "clean". While laundering stolen goods and stolen cryptocurrency through legal transactions is on the rise, there is a difference between weighing the validity of clean coins used in illegal transactions (selling stolen goods) and coin "made clean" through "laundering" stolen cryptocurrency. There are algorithms out there, by the way, to track cryptocurrency through the blockchain, so stolen coin assets are very traceable.

Regardless, this article notes some important facts but to someone not knowledgeable in the basics of cryptocurrency, there might be some confusion as to where in the crime the cryptocurrency sits, and to what extent the coin used in the crime is clean or dirty. Also, it is important to note that just because some cybercriminals are more sophisticated than newer ones who "leave tracks all over the place", it doesn't mean the tech behind cryptocurrency changes; again, coin can be traced and no matter how deep the laundering or the transaction hops, reaching back to the source can still be accomplished. It's all a matter of time in some cases. Regulation seeks to draw clear distinctions and in Europe there are strides that America needs to catch up on and start looking to implement.

Great article - we need more discussion in this area and in plain language that makes the cryptocurrency ecosystem easy to understand to the layperson.     

 
SOC 2s & Third-Party Assessments: How to Prevent Them from Being Used in a Data Breach Lawsuit
Beth Burgin Waller, Chair, Cybersecurity & Data Privacy Practice , Woods Rogers PLC,  12/5/2019
Cybersecurity Team Holiday Guide: 2019 Gag Gift Edition
Ericka Chickowski, Contributing Writer,  12/2/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-19645
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-09
alter.c in SQLite through 3.30.1 allows attackers to trigger infinite recursion via certain types of self-referential views in conjunction with ALTER TABLE statements.
CVE-2019-19678
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-09
In "Xray Test Management for Jira" prior to version 3.5.5, remote authenticated attackers can cause XSS in the generic field entry point via the Generic Test Definition field of a new Generic Test issue.
CVE-2019-19679
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-09
In "Xray Test Management for Jira" prior to version 3.5.5, remote authenticated attackers can cause XSS in the Pre-Condition Summary entry point via the summary field of a Create Pre-Condition action for a new Test Issue.
CVE-2019-19647
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-09
radare2 through 4.0.0 lacks validation of the content variable in the function r_asm_pseudo_incbin at libr/asm/asm.c, ultimately leading to an arbitrary write. This allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact via crafted input.
CVE-2019-19648
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-09
In the macho_parse_file functionality in macho/macho.c of YARA 3.11.0, command_size may be inconsistent with the real size. A specially crafted MachO file can cause an out-of-bounds memory access, resulting in Denial of Service (application crash) or potential code execution.