Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Threat Intelligence

End of Bibblio RCM includes -->
05:00 PM
Connect Directly

APTs, Teleworking, and Advanced VPN Exploits: The Perfect Storm

A Mandiant researcher shares the details of an investigation into the misuse of Pulse Secure VPN devices by suspected state-sponsored threat actors.

Virtual private networks (VPNs), which have become essential for many organizations that provide remote employees with access to private networks since the pandemic's onset, are a popular target for cyberattacks. Incident response teams say these attacks on VPNs aren't new, but attackers are finding new and sophisticated ways to compromise enterprise VPNs.

"VPN technology has proven to be very important for remote access for workers all around the world," says Bart Vanautgaerden, senior incident response consultant with Mandiant. 

But when did attackers begin to leverage VPN devices, and did that threat increase during the pandemic? "That is the real question," he adds.

A Mandiant team analyzed attacks targeting VPNs during a two-and-a-half-year period that spanned time before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Based on their data, it's unclear whether the rise in remote work or the role of VPN devices in an enterprise network is a bigger driver of attacks.

"VPN devices are an attractive target for attackers because of their place in the network itself — the leverage point, the foothold it provides them into remote networks, and not because of the pandemic," Vanautgaerden explains, adding that the team "only saw marginal increases in attacks" targeting VPN devices during the pandemic.

But while VPN-focused attacks may not have skyrocketed, their evolving sophistication was evident in attacks on Pulse Secure VPN devices in April. Mandiant incident responders were helping after an intrusion and couldn't determine how attackers gained a foothold in the victim's network. They did their usual forensics, swept the networks, and eventually discovered the activity came from Pulse Secure VPNs.

While this wasn't the first time VPNs had been misused by attackers, the response team also found the intruder had exploited a zero-day vulnerability (CVE-2021-22893) to compromise the fully patched VPN and then pivot into target networks.

"What stood out is the sophistication of the attack itself, and that really started with how these attackers approach these VPN devices," Vanautgaerden says. Normally, the response team might have information like IP addresses to help them, but in this case the attackers took extra care to use IP addresses in the location where the VPN clients would typically connect from.

They also used anti-forensic techniques on the VPN device, wiping logs and files and taking extra care to not leave any traces of their activity behind. Within the network, where typically incident responders might see an attacker executing malware on systems on dropping executables, they took additional steps to blend into their target environment, he adds.

16 Malware Families
In this campaign, attackers didn't only gain remote control over VPN devices used by victims across the United States and Europe. They deployed 16 malware families observed in the wild exclusively designed to operate on Pulse Secure VPNs, bypassed multifactor authentication to steal credentials, and moved laterally into private networks to access Microsoft 365 public cloud environments or other virtual environments, using those stolen credentials to do so.

Their objective was to steal data, Vanautgaerden says.

"Looking into the victims, the victim organizations that had these VPN devices, the data that they were gathering linked back to state-sponsored groups that we've been following for quite a while," he adds.

Mandiant began writing about this incident in April, with a primary focus on victims in the US in the defense industrial base. Since its disclosure, Vanautgaerden says many other organizations approached the company, and as a result the team was able to learn more about broader attacks that could potentially be related to the one they first discovered.

"We got more information and we saw differences — differences in the clusters of activity of the attackers targeting them, but also differences in the type of malware that were used in Europe versus the [malware] that was discovered with victim organizations in the United States," he adds.

The actors behind the US- and Europe-based attacks are associated with different groups, Vanautgaerden notes. But whether these are different teams working together or sharing information, or different teams altogether, has yet to be determined.

Vanautgaerden will share more details about this investigation from a European perspective, as well as best practices on digital forensics and incident response, during his upcoming Black Hat Europe briefing, "APTs Go Teleworking: The Rise of VPN Exploits."

Kelly Sheridan is the Staff Editor at Dark Reading, where she focuses on cybersecurity news and analysis. She is a business technology journalist who previously reported for InformationWeek, where she covered Microsoft, and Insurance & Technology, where she covered financial ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
Black Hat USA 2022 Attendee Report
Black Hat attendees are not sleeping well. Between concerns about attacks against cloud services, ransomware, and the growing risks to the global supply chain, these security pros have a lot to be worried about. Read our 2022 report to hear what they're concerned about now.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
PUBLISHED: 2022-08-12
Improper input validation on the `contains` LoopBack filter may allow for arbitrary SQL injection. When the extended filter property `contains` is permitted to be interpreted by the Postgres connector, it is possible to inject arbitrary SQL which may affect the confidentiality and integrity of data ...
PUBLISHED: 2022-08-12
undici is an HTTP/1.1 client, written from scratch for Node.js.`undici` is vulnerable to SSRF (Server-side Request Forgery) when an application takes in **user input** into the `path/pathname` option of `undici.request`. If a user specifies a URL such as `` or `//` ```js con...
PUBLISHED: 2022-08-12
BookWyrm is a social network for tracking your reading, talking about books, writing reviews, and discovering what to read next. Some links in BookWyrm may be vulnerable to tabnabbing, a form of phishing that gives attackers an opportunity to redirect a user to a malicious site. The issue was patche...
PUBLISHED: 2022-08-12
This Rails gem adds two methods to the ActiveRecord::Base class that allow you to update many records on a single database hit, using a case sql statement for it. Before version 0.1.3 `update_by_case` gem used custom sql strings, and it was not sanitized, making it vulnerable to sql injection. Upgra...
PUBLISHED: 2022-08-12
Shield is an authentication and authorization framework for CodeIgniter 4. This vulnerability may allow [SameSite Attackers](https://canitakeyoursubdomain.name/) to bypass the [CodeIgniter4 CSRF protection](https://codeigniter4.github.io/userguide/libraries/security.html) mechanism with CodeIgniter ...