Threat Intelligence

2/26/2018
04:30 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
Google+
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Adobe Flash Vulnerability Reappears in Malicious Word Files

CVE-2018-4878, a Flash zero-day patched earlier this month, has resurfaced in another campaign as attackers capitalize on the bug.

An Adobe Flash vulnerability CVE-2018-4878 patched earlier this month is being exploited in a new phishing campaign leveraging malicious Microsoft Word documents.

This critical vulnerability is a use-after-free bug that enables remote code execution, according to Adobe. It was first spotted in targeted attacks against primarily South Korean victims. In early February, the South Korea Computer Emergency Response Team (KrCERT/CC) issued an advisory on CVE-2018-4878 in Flash Payer ActiveX 28.0.0.137 and earlier versions.

Successful exploitation of the vulnerability could let an attacker assume control over an affected system. The first wave of attacks, delivered via malicious Excel documents, were attributed to the North Korean-based APT group ScarCruft. Some researchers say that group likely purchased the exploit given their overall lack of sophistication and access to cryptocurrency.

Adobe addressed CVE-2018-4878 in Flash version 28.0.0.161, released on February 6. Shortly after, Morphisec researchers spotted the vulnerability being exploited in the latest attack campaign.

After analyzing the first targeted attack, the team set up Yara rules to identify any usage of de-obfuscated attack files, explains Michael Gorelik, Morphisec CTO and vice president of R&D. On February 22, they noticed matching files appear in the wild and started an investigation.

They discovered the new campaign is very similar to the first one, save for a few changes the attackers made to evade static defenses. All malicious documents showed a low detection ratio on VirusTotal, and all next-stage artifacts were downloaded from a newly registered domain.

This campaign, which targeted about 1,000 people, was larger than the first but still aimed for specific victims. Its targets are scattered; victims' email addresses range from website owners to post offices. Most can be used as attack distributors to larger populations, says Gorelik. Unlike the earlier campaign, these targets were distributed between Europe and the US.

"The attackers did care less about staying undetected and had a very short campaign which was carefully designed, since they did know that other solutions will update their signatures within one to three days," he says.

Attackers slightly altered the malicious files by changing the encryption algorithm, though the shellcode was visible, he continues. They also used Word documents to deliver the exploit, which helped them succeed since the last campaign used compromised Excel files.

Emails used in the campaign included short links to a malicious website. Because the links were created with Google URL Shortener, analysts could view the click rate and mail host used. They learned victims opened these links through Outlook, Gmail, and Aruba.it, an Italian web host.

Gorelik doesn't think the attackers behind the first campaign are responsible for this one. Characteristics of the attack indicate this was done by cybercriminals and not a nation-state.

"This is the work of cybercriminal groups," he explains. "This is obvious based on the targets scattering, target count, the use of known obfuscation and evasion techniques without additional innovative approach." Further, the fact that the attack was executed only two days after domain registration is a sign of criminal activity. Domains for targeted attacks are usually compromised further in advance.

"It looks like very different actors are behind it, and they are using the de-obfuscated variants of published PoCs, and de-obfuscated samples which do not support 64-bit code execution," he explains. He expects other attackers will continue to take advantage of this exploit.

"We anticipated that this Flash exploit will be used in malspam campaigns very soon," he says, adding that he predicts the same exploit will be used in drive-by attacks in the near future. "The vulnerability is very stable and easy to exploit and bypasses all existing security mechanisms."

Related Content:

 

 

 

Black Hat Asia returns to Singapore with hands-on technical Trainings, cutting-edge Briefings, Arsenal open-source tool demonstrations, top-tier solutions and service providers in the Business Hall. Click for information on the conference and to register.

Kelly Sheridan is the Staff Editor at Dark Reading, where she focuses on cybersecurity news and analysis. She is a business technology journalist who previously reported for InformationWeek, where she covered Microsoft, and Insurance & Technology, where she covered financial ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
markgrogan
50%
50%
markgrogan,
User Rank: Apprentice
7/16/2018 | 11:22:01 PM
Competition is key
People take for granted the existing standards that we have simply because there are few other competitors for such file formats. Honestly speaking, there need to be more players in the market, simply so that people will have alternatives. And after all, competition in the market will propel innovation and not to mention give better price rates to customers everywhere. That's got to be good for everyone somehow!
Higher Education: 15 Books to Help Cybersecurity Pros Be Better
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  12/12/2018
'PowerSnitch' Hacks Androids via Power Banks
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  12/8/2018
Worst Password Blunders of 2018 Hit Organizations East and West
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  12/12/2018
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
10 Best Practices That Could Reshape Your IT Security Department
This Dark Reading Tech Digest, explores ten best practices that could reshape IT security departments.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-19007
PUBLISHED: 2018-12-14
In Geutebrueck GmbH E2 Camera Series versions prior to 1.12.0.25 the DDNS configuration (in the Network Configuration panel) is vulnerable to an OS system command injection as root.
CVE-2018-20147
PUBLISHED: 2018-12-14
In WordPress versions before 5.0.1, authors could modify metadata to bypass intended restrictions on deleting files.
CVE-2018-20148
PUBLISHED: 2018-12-14
In WordPress versions before 5.0.1, contributors could conduct PHP object injection attacks via crafted metadata.
CVE-2018-20149
PUBLISHED: 2018-12-14
In WordPress versions before 5.0.1, when the Apache HTTP Server is used, authors could upload crafted files that bypass intended MIME type restrictions, leading to XSS.
CVE-2018-20150
PUBLISHED: 2018-12-14
In WordPress versions before 5.0.1, crafted URLs could trigger XSS for certain use cases involving plugins.