Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Threat Intelligence

9/2/2020
06:30 PM
50%
50%

55% of Cybersquatted Domains Are Malicious or Potentially Fraudulent

The largest online companies, such as Apple and PayPal, and banks are being targeted by cybersquatters, who are also taking advantage of the pandemic, a study finds.

In a single month, cybersquatters registered almost 14,000 domain names, more than half of which went on to host malicious or likely fraudulent content, Palo Alto Networks states in a report released this week.

The company, which collected information on newly registered domains in December 2019, found 13,857 domains classified by its software as cybersquatting based on lexical analysis. Over the next eight months, the company went on to watch how the registrants used the domains. Domains registered using names similar to large Internet companies or banks usually ended up as phishing or fraud sites, the company says. 

Related Content:

Typosquatting Websites Proliferate in Run-up to US Elections

How Attackers Used Look-Alike Domains to Steal $1 Million From a Chinese VC

The Threat from the Internet—and What Your Organization Can Do About It

Latest Security News & Commentary About COVID-19

Cybersquatted domains resembling Apple.com, for example, led to malicious content more than 70% of the time, the report states. In addition, major events — such as the coronavirus pandemic — are used as a way to refresh a cybersquatter's stable of domains, says Zhanhao Chen, senior staff researcher for Palo Alto Networks' Unit 42 research team.

"In general, cybercriminals are always digging for opportunities to generate squatting domains from trending topics," he says. "For global topics like COVID-19, they're more likely to be combined with popular domains from major brands to try to scam as many users as possible."

Cybersquatting has been around almost as long as the Internet, originally as a tool of domain speculators, but in modern times more likely as a tool of fraudsters and cybercriminals. One of the most common techniques is typosquatting, where the registrants create variants of a brand's domain with common typographical errors.

Another common method is combosquatting, in which the attacker combines a common word — such as "security" or "payments" — with the brand. For example, secure-wellsfargo[.]org, a cybersquatting domain using the Wells Fargo brand, targeted the bank's customers in an attempt to use phishing to steal sensitive information.

In Palo Alto Networks' research, almost 19% of the 13,857 cybersquatted domains are classified as "malicious," either used for malware distribute or phishing attacks. Another 37% of the cybersquatted domains are considered "suspicious," which includes domains that are questionable, appear to be parked, have insufficient content, or host legally questionable software.

Combosquatted domains made extensive use of the coronavirus pandemic, Palo Alto Networks' Chen says.

"For COVID-19 specifically, we observed several squatting cases taking advantage of the pandemic," he says. "Cybercriminals combined trademarks with keywords like 'covid19' and 'coronavirus' to generate squatting domains and scam users."

Cybersquatters typically register their domains through registrars that have lax policies or automation tools that allow the mass registration of domains, according to the report. 

"The most abused registrar, Internet.bs, provides free services preferred by domain squatters, including privacy-protected registration and URL forwarding," the report states. "The second-most abused registrar, Openprovider, offers cheap and easy bulk registrations attracting many squatting registrations."

Because of the proliferation of free options for Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) certificate registrations, cybersquatting domains are increasingly using HTTPS, which typically gives the domain an air of respectability. Palo Alto Networks found that 18.5% of the malicious squatting domains are using HTTPS. However, users should not trust a domain just because the URL has a lock icon next to it, Chen says.

"The green lock is not enough," he says. "Security best practice is to confirm the domain name in the certificate is trusted."

Companies can protect their domains by proactively registering variants of their domain or company name, accounting for common misspellings and typos. Other variants of a company's domain name can be taken down through legal means. Cybersecurity firms offer monitoring services as well.

From a user security side, companies should train their employees to recognize suspicious domains. In addition, domain filters are increasingly taking into account a variety of factors, such as age of a domain and whether it is lexically similar to a brand name, to better identify potentially malicious or fraudulent domains.

 

Veteran technology journalist of more than 20 years. Former research engineer. Written for more than two dozen publications, including CNET News.com, Dark Reading, MIT's Technology Review, Popular Science, and Wired News. Five awards for journalism, including Best Deadline ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
sobrien60
50%
50%
sobrien60,
User Rank: Apprentice
9/4/2020 | 10:29:53 AM
DNS blocking
This is why you want to force your browser to use a managed DNS service such as Quad9.  They actively block most of these malicious domains.  I can't tell if Cloudflare does this for free, they do have a paid service which filters bad domains.

 

 
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 9/25/2020
Google Cloud Debuts Threat-Detection Service
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  9/23/2020
Shopify's Employee Data Theft Underscores Risk of Rogue Insiders
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  9/23/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
The COVID-19 pandemic turned the world -- and enterprise computing -- on end. Here's a look at how cybersecurity teams are retrenching their defense strategies, rebuilding their teams, and selecting new technologies to stop the oncoming rise of online attacks.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-26120
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-27
XSS exists in the MobileFrontend extension for MediaWiki before 1.34.4 because section.line is mishandled during regex section line replacement from PageGateway. Using crafted HTML, an attacker can elicit an XSS attack via jQuery's parseHTML method, which can cause image callbacks to fire even witho...
CVE-2020-26121
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-27
An issue was discovered in the FileImporter extension for MediaWiki before 1.34.4. An attacker can import a file even when the target page is protected against "page creation" and the attacker should not be able to create it. This occurs because of a mishandled distinction between an uploa...
CVE-2020-25812
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-27
An issue was discovered in MediaWiki 1.34.x before 1.34.4. On Special:Contributions, the NS filter uses unescaped messages as keys in the option key for an HTMLForm specifier. This is vulnerable to a mild XSS if one of those messages is changed to include raw HTML.
CVE-2020-25813
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-27
In MediaWiki before 1.31.10 and 1.32.x through 1.34.x before 1.34.4, Special:UserRights exposes the existence of hidden users.
CVE-2020-25814
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-27
In MediaWiki before 1.31.10 and 1.32.x through 1.34.x before 1.34.4, XSS related to jQuery can occur. The attacker creates a message with [javascript:payload xss] and turns it into a jQuery object with mw.message().parse(). The expected result is that the jQuery object does not contain an <a> ...