Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

6/29/2018
09:35 AM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

The 6 Worst Insider Attacks of 2018 – So Far

Stalkers, fraudsters, saboteurs, and all nature of malicious insiders have put the hurt on some very high-profile employers.
Previous
1 of 7
Next

Image Source: Adobe Stock (Andrea Danti)

Image Source: Adobe Stock (Andrea Danti)

If recent statistics are any indication, enterprise security teams might be greatly underestimating the risk that insider threats pose to their organizations. One study, by Crowd Research Partners, shows just 3% of executives pegged the potential cost of an insider threat at more than $2 million. Yet, according to Ponemon Institute, the average cost of insider threats per year for an organization is more than $8 million.

And those are just the quantifiable risks. When insider attackers hit hardest — particularly malicious insiders who are looking to commit fraud or intentionally do bad — the ramifications can be much more widespread than the typical data breach.

We're just six months into the year, and already we've seen some particularly damaging malicious insider events illustrate this truth. Here are some of the highest-profile incidents, all of which can act as a warning to enterprises to get serious about their monitoring and controls around employee activity.

 

Ericka Chickowski specializes in coverage of information technology and business innovation. She has focused on information security for the better part of a decade and regularly writes about the security industry as a contributor to Dark Reading.  View Full Bio

Previous
1 of 7
Next
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
RetiredUser
100%
0%
RetiredUser,
User Rank: Ninja
7/13/2018 | 9:58:34 AM
Yet Another Healthcare Breach - A Solution Soon?
Nuance is yet another healthcare breach that begs the question: When are Electronic Health Record (EHR) and medical application vendors going to wise up? In the EHR world (and even in the paper record world) de-identified patient data is an important step in the records workflow. Patient health information (PHI) from a medical record is stripped of all direct identifiers that can be used to identify the patient the record belongs to. Here's an idea inspired by that process that might actually work:

1. Any healthcare software vendor that houses patient data would be regulated to do the following:

a. Write into their PHI-housing software a feature that 1) encrypts PHI upon entry to the application, 2) ONLY decrypts the information for viewing and editing within the application based upon Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) that could include user credentials, network IP signatures and local system certificates, etc. and 3) any attempt to extract the encrypted data outside the application database would results in a useless blob of encrypted information.

2. Any healthcare software vendor who did not execute #1 would be fined and withheld from Federal money until they achieved that task; perhaps incentives could be offered to encourage them, too.

This model is possible and while it took a long time just to move to EHRs, having the EHR and all the other medical software applications saves no money at all if they keep getting breached. The model above would protect PHI even from insider attacks because in order for anyone to read the PHI they would have to have all the required elements, including the application server, app client, local certificates, user logins, IP signatures and so on for the data to decrypt for viewing. Potentially massive PHI data breaches could be a thing of the past with something like this in place.
REISEN1955
100%
0%
REISEN1955,
User Rank: Ninja
7/13/2018 | 8:26:25 AM
Re: Whistleblowing
SUNTRUST had a horrible reputation in the IT field for firing a ton of workers to train Indian replacements and sign non-disclosures.  Theyhave zero respect for IT as it relates to corp and fully deserve what they bought. 
Joe Stanganelli
50%
50%
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Ninja
7/3/2018 | 6:03:06 AM
Whistleblowing
Frankly, given the CEO's penchant for bombast, overstatement, and self-aggrandizement, I'm not entirely sure I personally find the Tesla employee's claims as untrustworthy here.

Moreover, employers tend to find whistleblowing to be just as much sabotage as actual wrench-throwing.

I 'Hacked' My Accounts Using My Mobile Number: Here's What I Learned
Nicole Sette, Director in the Cyber Risk practice of Kroll, a division of Duff & Phelps,  11/19/2019
6 Top Nontechnical Degrees for Cybersecurity
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  11/21/2019
Anatomy of a BEC Scam
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  11/21/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industry’s conventional wisdom. Here’s a look at what they’re thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-3654
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-22
Authentication Bypass vulnerability in the Microsoft Windows client in McAfee Client Proxy (MCP) prior to 3.0.0 allows local user to bypass scanning of web traffic and gain access to blocked sites for a short period of time via generating an authorization key on the client which should only be gener...
CVE-2014-2214
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-22
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in POSH (aka Posh portal or Portaneo) 3.0 through 3.2.1 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) error parameter to /includes/plugins/mobile/scripts/login.php or (2) id parameter to portal/openrssarticle.php
CVE-2014-6310
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-22
Buffer overflow in CHICKEN 4.9.0 and 4.9.0.1 may allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via the 'select' function.
CVE-2014-6311
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-22
generate_doygen.pl in ace before 6.2.7+dfsg-2 creates predictable file names in the /tmp directory which allows attackers to gain elevated privileges.
CVE-2019-16763
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-22
In Pannellum from 2.5.0 through 2.5.4 URLs were not sanitized for data URIs (or vbscript:), allowing for potential XSS attacks. Such an attack would require a user to click on a hot spot to execute and would require an attacker-provided configuration. The most plausible potential attack would be if ...