Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Perimeter

12/12/2008
03:22 PM
John H. Sawyer
John H. Sawyer
Commentary
50%
50%

USB Flash Drive Network Weaponization

Last month, the U.S. Department of Defense took drastic measures to stomp out a "rapidly spreading worm crawling across their networks" by banning USB flash drives and other removable media (see Wired's "Under Worm Assault, Military Bans Disks, USB Drives"). While knee-jerk reactions like this are sometimes useful to curb particular issues, quite often they wind up ineffective in the long term because decisions

Last month, the U.S. Department of Defense took drastic measures to stomp out a "rapidly spreading worm crawling across their networks" by banning USB flash drives and other removable media (see Wired's "Under Worm Assault, Military Bans Disks, USB Drives"). While knee-jerk reactions like this are sometimes useful to curb particular issues, quite often they wind up ineffective in the long term because decisions were made when too little information was known.The fact that the DoD had such a problem with malware on removable media is incredible and certainly disturbing, but what concerns me more is the potential of data sprawl and disclosure of sensitive information. The proliferation of such small devices makes it easy for the data to end up in the wrong hands because someone misplaced a flash drive the size of a quarter. Add to the small physical footprint the ever-increasing size of USB flash drives, and now users have the capabilities to carry around way too much data.

Physically plugging in removable USB storage devices into DoD machines isn't the only way these devices pose a problem. Helping to prove my point, Addonics has released a slick NAS Adapter that turns most any USB storage device into a network storage device. Are you thinking what I'm thinking?

Let's say the DoD has taken technical or physical measures to prevent the use of USB flash drives in its managed desktops and laptops. What's to say an attacker couldn't take that same flash drive, plug it into one of these network attached storage adapters, and then connect to it using one many network protocols (SMB, FTP, BitTorrent, UPnP) it supports to then transfer sensitive data?

Taking the attack scenario a step further, what's the likelihood that there's an easy way to hack the firmware of the NAS Adapter to run a custom version with pen-testing tools that has limitless storage via the USB interface? Weaponizing a NAS Adapter with man-in-the-middle (MitM) tools like Ettercap to capture sensitive data transfers, or UCSniff to record VoIP conversations, would be an awesome avenue of attack. And the size lends itself to so many creative ways of hiding it, like behind a network wall-plate, the back of a Cisco IP Phone, and those covered by Larry Pesce of PaulDotCom.

I think I'm going to have to get one of the new Addonics NAS Adapters just to see what I can do with it. Oh, and for you paranoid types out there, it might be worthwhile to find out what MAC addresses the company has registered and start monitoring for them on the network, too.

John H. Sawyer is a Senior Security Engineer on the IT Security Team at the University of Florida. The views and opinions expressed in this blog are his own and do not represent the views and opinions of the UF IT Security Team or the University of Florida. When John's not fighting flaming, malware-infested machines or performing autopsies on blitzed boxes, he can usually be found hanging with his family, bouncing a baby on one knee and balancing a laptop on the other. Special to Dark Reading.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Why Cyber-Risk Is a C-Suite Issue
Marc Wilczek, Digital Strategist & CIO Advisor,  11/12/2019
Black Hat Q&A: Hacking a '90s Sports Car
Black Hat Staff, ,  11/7/2019
The Cold Truth about Cyber Insurance
Chris Kennedy, CISO & VP Customer Success, AttackIQ,  11/7/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
7 Threats & Disruptive Forces Changing the Face of Cybersecurity
This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at the biggest emerging threats and disruptive forces that are changing the face of cybersecurity today.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-16863
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-14
STMicroelectronics ST33TPHF2ESPI TPM devices before 2019-09-12 allow attackers to extract the ECDSA private key via a side-channel timing attack because ECDSA scalar multiplication is mishandled, aka TPM-FAIL.
CVE-2019-18949
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-14
SnowHaze before 2.6.6 is sometimes too late to honor a per-site JavaScript blocking setting, which leads to unintended JavaScript execution via a chain of webpage redirections targeted to the user's browser configuration.
CVE-2011-1930
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-14
In klibc 1.5.20 and 1.5.21, the DHCP options written by ipconfig to /tmp/net-$DEVICE.conf are not properly escaped. This may allow a remote attacker to send a specially crafted DHCP reply which could execute arbitrary code with the privileges of any process which sources DHCP options.
CVE-2011-1145
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-14
The SQLDriverConnect() function in unixODBC before 2.2.14p2 have a possible buffer overflow condition when specifying a large value for SAVEFILE parameter in the connection string.
CVE-2011-1488
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-14
A memory leak in rsyslog before 5.7.6 was found in the way deamon processed log messages are logged when $RepeatedMsgReduction was enabled. A local attacker could use this flaw to cause a denial of the rsyslogd daemon service by crashing the service via a sequence of repeated log messages sent withi...