Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

3/29/2019
09:15 AM
100%
0%

UK Watchdog Criticizes Huawei for Lax Software Security, Development

Calling the company's software development practices chaotic and unsustainable, a UK government oversight group calls on the company to make measurable progress toward more secure and sustainable code.

The group responsible for overseeing Huawei's technical compliance with software and security standards in the UK roundly criticized the company for "serious and systematic defects in software engineering and cyber security competence" in a report released Thursday.

The annual report summarized the findings of the Huawei Cyber Security Evaluation Centre (HCSEC) Oversight Board, a panel of experts from the UK's National Cyber Security Center (NCSC) tasked with evaluating the efforts of Huawei to adhere to technical and cybersecurity standards. The group's fifth report found that the company continues to fail to adhere to basic secure coding practices, uses unsafe functions and libraries, suppresses warnings from security tools, and has an unmanageable build process.

"Given the scale of the issues, significant and sustained evidence of improvement across multiple versions and multiple products will be necessary to begin to build confidence in Huawei's software engineering and cyber security quality and development processes," the report stated. "A single 'good' build will provide no confidence in the long-term security and sustainability of the product in the real world."

The criticism comes as some Western governments are pushing back at Huawei's success in telecommunications networking technology. The US has pushed back against Huawei's success in cellular communications infrastructure and the rollout of 5G technology worldwide, going so far as passing a law to ban the technology in the US and threatening to curtail intelligence sharing with some nations. Huawei fired back, filing suit against the US government in US courts.

Yet the issues identified by the UK's NCSEC Oversight Board are more fundamental than political. Technology companies, especially those responsible for critical infrastructure, need to have better development practices in place, says Lane Thames, senior security researcher at Tripwire.

"Security evaluations of their hardware and software before production deployment should be required," he says. "The organization who runs the infrastructure should implement strong foundation controls, such as change management, file integrity monitoring, secure configuration management, and vulnerability management, to ensure that systems comply with security policies once they are in production."

Huawei has repeatedly committed to improving its software development and secure coding standards, but has so far failed to implement better practices, the HCSEC Oversight Board stated in the report. 

The Oversight Board's analysis of the company's use of the open source OpenSSL codebase, for example, found that it used 70 full copies of four different versions, 304 partial copies of 14 versions, and fragments of 10 other versions. Later versions of the company's code had reduced the number, but the board members said it contained "code that is vulnerable to 10 publicly disclosed OpenSSL vulnerabilities, some dating back to 2006." 

Another analysis of safe memory-handling functions found that the 11% of direct byte-copying functions, 22% of string-copying functions, and 9% of string-printing functions used unsafe variants.

"Despite Huawei mandating application of its secure coding standards across R&D, extensive use of commercial static analysis tools and Huawei's insistence that risky code has been refactored, there has been little improvement in the object software engineering and cyber security quality of the code delivered for assessment by HCSEC and onward to the UK operators," the board members stated in the report.

Huawei did not respond to a request for comment sent vie e-mail, but the company has committed to investing $2 billion over the next five years in its software engineering process. The Oversight Board lauded the commitment, but questioned how little progress is visible. 

"This proposed investment, while welcome, is currently no more than a proposed initial budget for, as yet, unspecified activities," the board members stated in the report.

The problem is not just with Huawei, however. Other companies — from Microsoft to Cisco — often have critical vulnerabilities in their software but have generally embarked on secure programming initiatives to train developers in secure coding practices. 

"The problem here is that, one, developing secure software is hard, and, two, we are failing to integrate security fundamentals into our education system for STEM-based students," Tripwire's Thames said. "Vendors who develop Internet-connected hardware and software should ensure that they implementing secure coding practices."

Cybersecurity and geopolitical concerns have had an increasing impact on how companies do business. Two-thirds of security professionals have had to change where and with whom they do business because of cybersecurity concerns, according to a survey conducted by security firm Tripwire at the RSA Conference last month. 

"While some of these responses are not surprising, it’s likely that we're underestimating the impact that growing nation-state cyberattacks have on business choices," said Tim Erlin, vice president of product management and strategy at Tripwire, in a post. "We may not be far off from a time when locating a business in a nation that provides strong defenses is viewed as a competitive advantage."

Calling on Huawei to provide demonstrable evidence that its software development practices have changed, the HCSEC Oversight Board stated that "strongly worded commitments from Huawei in the past have not brought about any discernable improvements," the report stated.

Related Content:

 

 

 

 

Join Dark Reading LIVE for two cybersecurity summits at Interop 2019. Learn from the industry's most knowledgeable IT security experts. Check out the Interop agenda here.

Veteran technology journalist of more than 20 years. Former research engineer. Written for more than two dozen publications, including CNET News.com, Dark Reading, MIT's Technology Review, Popular Science, and Wired News. Five awards for journalism, including Best Deadline ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
StephenGiderson
50%
50%
StephenGiderson,
User Rank: Strategist
5/8/2019 | 1:07:57 AM
Lose billions
I have to admit that this tech giant does produce great products and provides great services. However, security lapses aren't something to joke around about. Security lapses should be made as the topmost priority of any company, else risk losing billions in no time.
Firms Improve Threat Detection but Face Increasingly Disruptive Attacks
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  2/20/2020
Ransomware Damage Hit $11.5B in 2019
Dark Reading Staff 2/20/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
6 Emerging Cyber Threats That Enterprises Face in 2020
This Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at six emerging cyber threats that enterprises could face in 2020. Download your copy today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises Are Developing and Maintaining Secure Applications
How Enterprises Are Developing and Maintaining Secure Applications
The concept of application security is well known, but application security testing and remediation processes remain unbalanced. Most organizations are confident in their approach to AppSec, although others seem to have no approach at all. Read this report to find out more.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-18238
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-26
Moxa ioLogik 2542-HSPA Series Controllers and IOs, and IOxpress Configuration Utility ioLogik 2500 series firmware, Version 3.0 or lower IOxpress configuration utility, Version 2.3.0 or lower. Sensitive information is stored in configuration files without encryption, which may allow an attacker to a...
CVE-2019-17274
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-26
NetApp FAS 8300/8700 and AFF A400 Baseboard Management Controller (BMC) firmware versions 13.x prior to 13.1P1 were shipped with a default account enabled that could allow unauthorized arbitrary command execution via local access.
CVE-2019-17275
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-26
OnCommand Cloud Manager versions prior to 3.8.0 are susceptible to arbitrary code execution by remote attackers.
CVE-2020-3169
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-26
A vulnerability in the CLI of Cisco FXOS Software could allow an authenticated, local attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying Linux operating system with a privilege level of root on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of arguments passed to a spe...
CVE-2020-3170
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-26
A vulnerability in the NX-API feature of Cisco NX-OS Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause an NX-API system process to unexpectedly restart. The vulnerability is due to incorrect validation of the HTTP header of a request that is sent to the NX-API. An attacker could expl...