Since the early days of "ethical hacking" and security vulnerability analysis, researchers have followed a time-honored set of rules and traditions as to how to reveal the vulnerabilities they discover in a way that gives the bad guys as small a window as possible to exploit potential security holes in systems and software.
With the advent of "bug bounties" and offers from cybercriminals and government agencies, however, a new vulnerability today has a higher price than ever before.
When it comes to the hot-button topic of vulnerability research and disclosure, there are so many competing interests and attitudes toward doing it properly that it's difficult to know when to speak up and when to shut up. Vulnerability discovery and disclosure can also be a dangerous game from both a moral and a legal perspective.
Further complicating matters is the amount of money involved in vulnerability research. Cybercriminals make their living by buying, selling and exploiting unpatched vulnerabilities, and you'll find no shortage of buyers if you have a novel exploit for sale. Indeed, government agencies will pay handsomely for unique, undiscovered flaws in certain software packages.
This activity has been going on for a long time, but what's changed during the past several years is that commercial software developers are now buyers in this game, and that's what makes the business of vulnerability disclosure so interesting.
It wasn't all that long ago that most software shops unleashed huge armies of lawyers against an organization or individual that threatened to release information about an unpatched vulnerability to the public. The net effect of that approach was that newly discovered vulnerabilities would either go unreported out of fear of retribution or be sold to black market elements. Or they would simply be released to everyone at the same time, including hackers.
Thankfully, forward-thinking software companies have started to evolve their views on the subject of vulnerability disclosure, driven in no small part by open market forces. As a result, companies like Microsoft, Google and Facebook openly pay bug bounties for various undiscovered vulnerabilities. At the same time, bug bounty programs promise to shield security researchers from potential litigation when a vulnerability is reported in a "responsible" manner.
In some cases, the responsible reporting of a new vulnerability can earn you bragging rights and glory in the security business. For example, Google maintains a Hall of Fame that records and recognizes the individual contributions made by security researchers.
By turning the game of vulnerability discovery and reporting into a business that encourages and rewards security pros who come forward and report problems, everyone who plays by the rules benefits.
Unfortunately, not every software company believes in the concept of responsible disclosure. Some say they do, but then bury vulnerabilities in the software equivalent of Hangar 18.
The changing landscape of vulnerability disclosure may affect the way you deploy and manage your defenses. How should you respond to a new vulnerability disclosed in this changing environment? This report offers some insights.
Bug bounty programs have attracted the attention of both hobbyists and professional security pros. Professional security researchers (white-hat hackers) have always helped software companies address vulnerabilities in their code, but now black-hat hackers are getting in on the action -- in a sanctioned way -- as well.
The bug bounty concept is brilliant for several reasons. First, it gives black-hat hackers who would normally sell exploits to criminal elements a way to get paid and recognized -- legally.
Second, software companies gain access to security expertise that they would otherwise have to pay much more for. Third, bug bounty programs allow software companies to develop relationships with security pros, stay on top of trends, get new deas about secure coding standards and recruit top talent without ever having to lift a finger.
Finally, such programs may result in more exploits being uncovered, resulting in your company's computing infrastructure being more secure (assuming that you apply patches for all of these newfound bugs).
Google and Facebook were among the first software companies to challenge the conventional wisdom of vulnerability disclosure by offering financial rewards in exchange for meaningful exploit samples.
Early on, bug bounty programs were viewed as a gimmick by black-hat hackers and white-hat security pros alike. But as time has gone on, these programs have become widely accepted as an effective way to ensure that the most damaging exploits land in the hands of the developer and not the cybercriminal.
To learn more about the process of vulnerability disclosure, how it's changing, and how it may affect your defenses, download the free report.
Have a comment on this story? Please click "Add a Comment" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.