Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

Study: 81 Percent Of Children Have An Online Presence Before Age Two

One-quarter of children are online before they're even born, AVG report says

You don't have to be able to type -- or even speak -- to be recognized online, a new study says. Heck, you don't even have to be born.

According to a reportreleased this week by security vendor AVG, more than 80 percent of children have an online presence before they're 2 years old -- and some 25 percent of kids are online in some fashion before they're even born.

Uploading prenatal sonogram photographs, tweeting pregnancy experiences, making online photo albums of children from birth, and even creating email addresses for babies -- today's parents are increasingly building digital footprints for their children prior to and from the moment they are born, AVG says.

"Our research shows that the trend is increasing for a child's digital birth to coincide with -- and in many cases, predate -- their real birth date," the report states. "A quarter of babies have sonogram photos posted online before they have even physically entered into the world."

In the U.S., 92 percent of children have an online presence by the time they are two, compared to 73 percent of children in Europe.

According to the research, the average digital birth of children happens at around six months, with one-third (33 percent) of children's photos and information posted online within weeks of being born. In the U.S. 37 percent of newborns have an online life from birth; in Australia and New Zealand the figure is 41 percent.

Almost one-quarter (23 percent) of children begin their digital lives when parents upload their prenatal sonogram scans to the Internet. This figure is higher in the U.S., where 34 percent have posted sonograms online. Fewer parents share sonograms of their children in France (13 percent), Italy (14 percent), and Germany (15 percent).

Seven percent of babies and toddlers have an email address created for them by their parents, and 5 percent have a social network profile.

When asked what motivates parents to post images of their babies on the Internet, more than 70 percent of all mothers surveyed said it was to share with friends and family. However, more than one-fifth (22 percent) of mothers in the U.S. said they wanted to add more content to their social network profiles, while 18 percent of U.S. mothers said they were simply following their peers.

AVG asked mothers how concerned they are (on a scale of one to five, with five being "very concerned") about the amount of online information available on their children in future years. The mothers were moderately concerned (average 3.5).

"It's shocking to think that a 30-year-old has an online footprint stretching back 10 to 15 years at most, while the vast majority of children today will have online presence by the time they are 2 years old --a presence that will continue to build throughout their whole lives," says AVG CEO J.R. Smith.

Smith urges parents to think about two things:

"First, you are creating a digital history for a human being that will follow him or her for the rest of their life. What kind of footprint do you actually want to start for your child, and what will they think about the information you've uploaded in future?

"Secondly, it reinforces the need for parents to be aware of the privacy settings they have set on their social network and other profiles. Otherwise, sharing a baby's picture and specific information may not only be shared with friends and family, but with the whole online world."

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Tim Wilson is Editor in Chief and co-founder of Dark Reading.com, UBM Tech's online community for information security professionals. He is responsible for managing the site, assigning and editing content, and writing breaking news stories. Wilson has been recognized as one ... View Full Bio

 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 8/3/2020
Pen Testers Who Got Arrested Doing Their Jobs Tell All
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  8/5/2020
New 'Nanodegree' Program Provides Hands-On Cybersecurity Training
Nicole Ferraro, Contributing Writer,  8/3/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal, a Dark Reading Perspective
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
This special report takes a look at how enterprises are using threat intelligence, as well as emerging best practices for integrating threat intel into security operations and incident response. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-15058
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-07
Lindy 42633 4-Port USB 2.0 Gigabit Network Server 2.078.000 devices allow an attacker on the same network to elevate privileges because the administrative password can be discovered by sniffing unencrypted UDP traffic.
CVE-2020-15059
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-07
Lindy 42633 4-Port USB 2.0 Gigabit Network Server 2.078.000 devices allow an attacker on the same network to bypass authentication via a web-administration request that lacks a password parameter.
CVE-2020-15060
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-07
Lindy 42633 4-Port USB 2.0 Gigabit Network Server 2.078.000 devices allow an attacker on the same network to conduct persistent XSS attacks by leveraging administrative privileges to set a crafted server name.
CVE-2020-15061
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-07
Lindy 42633 4-Port USB 2.0 Gigabit Network Server 2.078.000 devices allow an attacker on the same network to denial-of-service the device via long input values.
CVE-2020-15062
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-07
DIGITUS DA-70254 4-Port Gigabit Network Hub 2.073.000.E0008 devices allow an attacker on the same network to elevate privileges because the administrative password can be discovered by sniffing unencrypted UDP traffic.