Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

9/24/2019
02:30 PM
Dark Reading
Dark Reading
Products and Releases
50%
50%

NormShield Enables Organizations to Calculate Potential Financial Impact of Cyberattacks on Suppliers, Partners

VIENNA, VA, September 24, 2019 – No matter how hardened a company’s cyber defenses are, significant risk remains when suppliers and third-party trading partners are attacked and compromised. Today, NormShield, the only provider of a standards-based external cyber risk assessment platform, unveiled the first-ever automated tool to combine and assess both cyber and financial risk.

Calculating the dollar value of the probable loss caused by an attack on a supplier or partner enables Chief Information Security Officers (CISOs), Chief Risk Officers (CROs) and Chief Financial Officers (CFO) to measure and mitigate cyber risk to business performance.

To measure the potential financial impact (risk) to an organization, NormShield uses the Factor Analysis of Information Risk (FAIR) Model, the only international standard Value at Risk (VaR) model for cybersecurity and operational risk.

“Incorporating the FAIR Model into cyber risk assessments enables organizations to effectively quantify the true financial cyber risk to their bottom lines,” said Mohamoud Jibrell, CEO of NormShield. “Companies now can have a three-dimensional view of the technical, compliance and financial impact of a cyberattack to better understand the full risk relationship with a partner or supplier. For some, the business benefits will outweigh the cyber risks but for others it may not.”

In financial services, for example, CISOs and CROs will be able to show the business that the threat of an attack on a vendor is real and gauge whether the odds are rising or falling. Further, CISOs and CROs can now show the business the financial impact of sharing fewer records with a vendor. The business can then determine which is greater, the reduction in probable costs from an attack on that vendor or the increase in revenue from sharing more records with that vendor.

A company’s vendors have different levels of importance. A vendor that does not have access to any systems or confidential data will have lower risk than that of a vendor that has access to PII data of company employees. The FAIR model allows NormShield to give a vendor business impact (Loss Magnitude) in risk calculation – from both the technical and financial perspectives.

“Every dollar spent on cyber risk management is a dollar that can’t be spent growing the business or addressing other organization imperatives,” said Jack Jones, chief risk scientist for RiskLens. “Consequently, cost-effective cyber risk management — knowing what matters most, and getting the best bang for your risk management buck — is a necessary cornerstone of organization success.”

The FAIR methodology was conceived as a way to provide meaningful measurements to satisfy management's desire to make effective comparisons and well-informed decisions. FAIR has become the only international standard Value at Risk (VaR) model for cybersecurity and operational risk.

 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
The State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
In this report learn how enterprises are building their incident response teams and processes, how they research potential compromises, how they respond to new breaches, and what tools and processes they use to remediate problems and improve their cyber defenses for the future.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-32066
PUBLISHED: 2021-08-01
An issue was discovered in Ruby through 2.6.7, 2.7.x through 2.7.3, and 3.x through 3.0.1. Net::IMAP does not raise an exception when StartTLS fails with an an unknown response, which might allow man-in-the-middle attackers to bypass the TLS protections by leveraging a network position between the c...
CVE-2021-37759
PUBLISHED: 2021-07-31
A Session ID leak in the DEBUG log file in Graylog before 4.1.2 allows attackers to escalate privileges (to the access level of the leaked session ID).
CVE-2021-37760
PUBLISHED: 2021-07-31
A Session ID leak in the audit log in Graylog before 4.1.2 allows attackers to escalate privileges (to the access level of the leaked session ID).
CVE-2020-26564
PUBLISHED: 2021-07-31
ObjectPlanet Opinio before 7.15 allows XXE attacks via three steps: modify a .css file to have <!ENTITY content, create a .xml file for a generic survey template (containing a link to this .css file), and import this .xml file at the survey/admin/folderSurvey.do?action=viewImportSurvey['importFil...
CVE-2020-26565
PUBLISHED: 2021-07-31
ObjectPlanet Opinio before 7.14 allows Expression Language Injection via the admin/permissionList.do from parameter. This can be used to retrieve possibly sensitive serverInfo data.