Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

Enterprises Gearing Up for Identity, Compliance Management Next Year

Security event management, database security also rank high among near-term plans

Enterprises are putting identity management and compliance management on their calendars for the coming year, according to a new study that will be published later this week by the Computer Security Institute.

In a study of more than 300 security professionals, CSI asked which technologies enterprises plan to deploy in the coming year. Identity management was the top response, with almost 21 percent of respondents saying they are planning a new deployment in the next 12 months.

"Not surprising in the least was the strong turnout for identity management, a category that offers some radical possibilities for changing the game in security," says Robert Richardson, director of CSI. "Sixteen percent are piloting it, 21 percent plan to do so within the next year, and a full 40 percent have it fully deployed."

Compliance management was cited by 20 percent of those surveyed, while security event management (19.2 percent) and database security (18.9 percent) followed.

"It was fascinating to see a surprisingly high turnout for log management, with 46 percent saying they’d fully deployed it," Richardson says. "Some people talk about it as a minor element of security, but it’s clearly one that’s got a lot of real-world traction. It’s also clear that database security has come into its own, with 51 percent saying they’d deployed it."

While survey respondents indicated that compliance management is the second-most important technology they are planning to implement in the coming year, 50 percent indicated that they were not familiar with any of the vendors listed. “Such a high lack of awareness would appear to indicate significant opportunity for vendors within the category,” suggests Richardson.

While most of the tools and technologies discussed in the survey garnered at least some interest from most respondents, third-party services did not fare so well. Some 40 percent of respondents said they have "no plans" to deploy managed security services in the near future, and 42 percent said they have no plans to deploy management consulting or professional services.

The survey results will be available later this week.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Tim Wilson is Editor in Chief and co-founder of Dark Reading.com, UBM Tech's online community for information security professionals. He is responsible for managing the site, assigning and editing content, and writing breaking news stories. Wilson has been recognized as one ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
When It Comes To Security Tools, More Isn't More
Lamont Orange, Chief Information Security Officer at Netskope,  1/11/2021
US Capitol Attack a Wake-up Call for the Integration of Physical & IT Security
Seth Rosenblatt, Contributing Writer,  1/11/2021
IoT Vendor Ubiquiti Suffers Data Breach
Dark Reading Staff 1/11/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
2020: The Year in Security
Download this Tech Digest for a look at the biggest security stories that - so far - have shaped a very strange and stressful year.
Flash Poll
Assessing Cybersecurity Risk in Today's Enterprises
Assessing Cybersecurity Risk in Today's Enterprises
COVID-19 has created a new IT paradigm in the enterprise -- and a new level of cybersecurity risk. This report offers a look at how enterprises are assessing and managing cyber-risk under the new normal.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-25533
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-15
An issue was discovered in Malwarebytes before 4.0 on macOS. A malicious application was able to perform a privileged action within the Malwarebytes launch daemon. The privileged service improperly validated XPC connections by relying on the PID instead of the audit token. An attacker can construct ...
CVE-2021-3162
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-15
Docker Desktop Community before 2.5.0.0 on macOS mishandles certificate checking, leading to local privilege escalation.
CVE-2021-21242
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-15
OneDev is an all-in-one devops platform. In OneDev before version 4.0.3, there is a critical vulnerability which can lead to pre-auth remote code execution. AttachmentUploadServlet deserializes untrusted data from the `Attachment-Support` header. This Servlet does not enforce any authentication or a...
CVE-2021-21245
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-15
OneDev is an all-in-one devops platform. In OneDev before version 4.0.3, AttachmentUploadServlet also saves user controlled data (`request.getInputStream()`) to a user specified location (`request.getHeader("File-Name")`). This issue may lead to arbitrary file upload which can be used to u...
CVE-2021-21246
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-15
OneDev is an all-in-one devops platform. In OneDev before version 4.0.3, the REST UserResource endpoint performs a security check to make sure that only administrators can list user details. However for the `/users/` endpoint there are no security checks enforced so it is possible to retrieve ar...