Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

5/1/2019
05:00 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Digital Ad-Fraud Losses Decline

Even so, more work remains to be done to address online ad fraud operations that cause billions of dollars in losses annually for advertisers.

Industry-wide efforts to combat fraud in digital advertising appear to be paying off: advertisers globally will lose about 11% less - about $5.8 billion - to fraud this year compared to $6.5 billion lost in 2017, a new study found.

White Ops and the Association of National Advertisers (ANA) analyzed data from a total of 2,400 ad campaigns that were run by 50 ANA members. The ads were placed is some 606,000 domains and garnered over 24 billion impressions in total.

For the first time, a majority of fraud attempts are getting blocked before fraudsters get paid, as ad buyers and sellers become savvier about dealing with the threat. Without those efforts, digital ad fraud would have topped $14 billion this year, White Ops and the ANA estimate.

"The fight against fraud has not been won," says Michael Tiffany, president and co-Founder at White Ops. "But it is winnable, thanks to collective efforts to reduce the profitability of the crime and increase its cost and risk."

Digital ad fraud has cost advertisers tens of billions of dollars in recent years. Much of the fraud has stemmed from the use of bots to create fake page views and fake clicks on ads. One of the most common uses for botnets, for example, has been for ad fraud.

Experts consider non-human traffic, or bot traffic, to be one of the biggest sources of digital ad fraud. Other kinds of ad fraud include the use of non-viewable ads on websites and the use of click farms where humans are paid to click on ads to increase page views and ad impressions.

White Ops and the ANA estimated that fraud attempts account for some 20% to 35% of all ad impressions in a year, but the number actually getting through has become substantially smaller because of the industry-wide response to the problem.

Stopping Bots

Several factors are contributing to this success. More built-in controls and filters are available across the digital ad pipeline for spotting bot traffic and other forms of fraud including blacklists and parameter-based detection techniques, White Ops and the ANA said in their new report.

Some of the biggest bot-traffic retailers have been shuttered as well, making it harder for low-level cybercriminals to profit from ad fraud. Arrests of the operators behind major botnet operations—3ve and Methbot—have had a real impact on ad fraud operations based overseas.

"It's harder to buy realistic bot traffic at 'retail,'" Tiffany says. With some of the biggest bot traffic retailers knocked out of business, others offering similar services have been forced to move underground to invite-only forums and chat networks, he says. "Realistic bot traffic that won't get caught costs more money, reducing the arbitrage opportunity for those who buy it."

Ads.txt, a relatively new mechanism from the Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB), has been another major factor, Tiffany notes. Ads.txt, according to the IAB, is basically designed to give content publishers and distributors a way to publicly declare "the companies they authorize their digital inventory." The transparency enabled by this mechanism has made it harder for criminals to commit ad fraud.

Billions of dollars in fraud are getting stymied by programmatic filtering and by the use of sophisticated analytics to identify and not count invalid traffic, Tiffany says. Advertisers demanding clawbacks, or refunds for payments for invalid traffic, have been another factor.

Unfinished Business

At the same time, a lot more work remains to be done, according to White Ops and the ANA. One of the biggest problems continues to be the very uneven auditability of ads in different formats and environments, they say.

Video ads and mobile ads are especially problematic areas. "The frontiers in fraud are in mobile apps and connected TV," Tiffany says.

In both of these platforms, fraud is innovative and growing, but so far has not outstripped the gains in other areas. "The big question is what happens from here," Tiffany says. Without the same kind of industry wide-collaboration on these fronts, the current reduction in fraud may only be temporary, he warns.

Related Content:

 

 

Join Dark Reading LIVE for two cybersecurity summits at Interop 2019. Learn from the industry's most knowledgeable IT security experts. Check out the Interop agenda here.

Jai Vijayan is a seasoned technology reporter with over 20 years of experience in IT trade journalism. He was most recently a Senior Editor at Computerworld, where he covered information security and data privacy issues for the publication. Over the course of his 20-year ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
RDP Bug Takes New Approach to Host Compromise
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  7/18/2019
The Problem with Proprietary Testing: NSS Labs vs. CrowdStrike
Brian Monkman, Executive Director at NetSecOPEN,  7/19/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Building and Managing an IT Security Operations Program
As cyber threats grow, many organizations are building security operations centers (SOCs) to improve their defenses. In this Tech Digest you will learn tips on how to get the most out of a SOC in your organization - and what to do if you can't afford to build one.
Flash Poll
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
Your enterprise's cyber risk may depend upon the relationship between the IT team and the security team. Heres some insight on what's working and what isn't in the data center.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-10101
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-23
ServiceStack ServiceStack Framework 4.5.14 is affected by: Cross Site Scripting (XSS). The impact is: JavaScrpit is reflected in the server response, hence executed by the browser. The component is: the query used in the GET request is prone. The attack vector is: Since there is no server-side valid...
CVE-2019-10102
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-23
Voice Builder Prior to commit c145d4604df67e6fc625992412eef0bf9a85e26b and f6660e6d8f0d1d931359d591dbdec580fef36d36 is affected by: CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection'). The impact is: Remote code execution with the same privileges as the...
CVE-2019-10102
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-23
Jeesite 1.2.7 is affected by: SQL Injection. The impact is: sensitive information disclosure. The component is: updateProcInsIdByBusinessId() function in src/main/java/com.thinkgem.jeesite/modules/act/ActDao.java has SQL Injection vulnerability. The attack vector is: network connectivity,authenticat...
CVE-2018-18670
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-23
GNUBOARD5 5.3.1.9 has XSS that allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the "Extra Contents" parameter, aka the adm/config_form_update.php cf_1~10 parameter.
CVE-2018-18672
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-23
GNUBOARD5 5.3.1.9 has XSS that allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the "board head contents" parameter, aka the adm/board_form_update.php bo_content_head parameter.