theDocumentId => 1334845 GDPR's First-Year Impact by the Numbers

Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk //

Compliance

5/31/2019
01:45 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
100%
0%

GDPR's First-Year Impact by the Numbers

The latest statistics on GDPR spending, compliance rates, enforcement and consumer attitudes on privacy protection.
Previous
1 of 7
Next

Image Source: Adobe Stock (tanaonte)

It has been a year since the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) compliance deadline kicked in, and in that time the landmark privacy and cybersecurity regulatory rules have made waves worldwide among enterprises with European connections. GDPR has raised the bar for privacy and security awareness at the board level, as well as assured continued increases in security and compliance spending at most large organizations in the coming years.

Of course, the efficacy of the regulation still remains a point of contention. Consumer surveys show that many European citizens are still skeptical about the benefits they've received from GDPR protections so far, and enterprise surveys show that compliance is still a work in progress.

Here are some of the latest statistics that offer up signposts of where we are with GDPR at the one-year anniversary.

 

Ericka Chickowski specializes in coverage of information technology and business innovation. She has focused on information security for the better part of a decade and regularly writes about the security industry as a contributor to Dark Reading.  View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Previous
1 of 7
Next
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
5/31/2019 | 3:08:59 PM
point of contention
I can understand the skepticism of EU citizens. If I were in that category what I would love to see is a holistic listing of all companies that deal with EU citizen data. Of those companies, what are they bound to from a compliance standpoint. Essentially if you create this as a high level diagram a citizen could truncate it down to businesses of interest and ensure that they are inline with consumer expectations.
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
The State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
In this report learn how enterprises are building their incident response teams and processes, how they research potential compromises, how they respond to new breaches, and what tools and processes they use to remediate problems and improve their cyber defenses for the future.
Flash Poll
New Best Practices for Secure App Development
New Best Practices for Secure App Development
The transition from DevOps to SecDevOps is combining with the move toward cloud computing to create new challenges - and new opportunities - for the information security team. Download this report, to learn about the new best practices for secure application development.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-33629
PUBLISHED: 2021-07-26
isula-build before 0.9.5-8 can cause a program crash, when building container images, some functions for processing external data do not remove spaces when processing data.
CVE-2021-37534
PUBLISHED: 2021-07-26
app/View/GalaxyClusters/add.ctp in MISP 2.4.146 allows Stored XSS when forking a galaxy cluster.
CVE-2021-26824
PUBLISHED: 2021-07-26
DM FingerTool v1.19 in the DM PD065 Secure USB is susceptible to improper authentication by a replay attack, allowing local attackers to bypass user authentication and access all features and data on the USB.
CVE-2020-12681
PUBLISHED: 2021-07-26
Missing TLS certificate validation on 3xLogic Infinias eIDC32 devices through 3.4.125 allows an attacker to intercept/control the channel by which door lock policies are applied.
CVE-2020-4623
PUBLISHED: 2021-07-26
IBM i2 iBase 8.9.13 could allow a local authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code on the system, caused by a DLL search order hijacking flaw. By using a specially-crafted .DLL file, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code on the system. IBM X-Force ID: 184984.