Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

9/23/2015
05:15 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Cloud Security Visibility Gap Dogs Deployments

SANS says visibility is the top cloud security concern.

As enterprises increasingly weave a growing number of outside cloud providers into the fabric of today's IT infrastructure, visibility into cloud provider operations and security controls reigns as the number one cloud security concern, according to a recent survey conducted by SANS Institute on behalf of Cloud Passage.

In a report released today, SANS analyst David Shackleford says that the opacity of provider infrastructure management remains a huge point of contention among IT professionals, with 58 percent citing it as the biggest problem they have with cloud vendors.

"Regardless of the model used, the issues are the same: Lack of visibility, steep fees for vendor-provided security and lack of compliance support are respondents’ top three concerns with their public cloud services," he writes, explaining that this is a concern whether organizations are using software as a service (SaaS), platform as a service (PaaS), or infrastructure as a service (IaaS) providers.

This nevertheless is doing nothing to dampen cloud adoption—81 percent of respondents say they expect to deploy a SaaS environment within the next year and well over half expect to deploy PaaS and IaaS.  

As organizations seek to square this visibility gap with accelerated deployments, the biggest security challenge they'll face is in keeping the auditors at bay. Nearly three-quarters of respondents said that maintaining compliance across public, private and hybrid cloud environments has been a huge challenge related to their cloud model.

As cloud adoption continues to snowball, so does the amount of sensitive data in the cloud. Approximately 48 percent of respondents store or process employee records in the cloud and 40 percent store or process customers' personal information. And 20 percent of organization also use the cloud to store or process intellectual property, customer financial information, and health records.

All of this sensitive data puts a target squarely on the back of these cloud environments and that worries respondents. Approximately 40 percent say they're concerned about unauthorized access to data by other tenants and 38 percent are concerned about shadow IT in the cloud. And circling back to the visibility concern, well over a third of organizations are worried that the public  cloud's lack of consistent security controls that integrate with on-premises tools and security management make it difficult to keep tabs on data from end to end.

"A number of respondents also specifically mentioned the need for greater security automation, whereby security teams have access to tools and scripts that integrate with provider and SecaaS APIs to better secure and monitor their cloud assets," Shackleford says. "Security teams are struggling to get enough visibility into cloud provider infrastructure, controls and processes through contracts and audit reports, and say the nature of organizations’ 'defense in depth' security stack has to change as well."

Ericka Chickowski specializes in coverage of information technology and business innovation. She has focused on information security for the better part of a decade and regularly writes about the security industry as a contributor to Dark Reading.  View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Navigating Security in the Cloud
Diya Jolly, Chief Product Officer, Okta,  12/4/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-19642
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-08
On SuperMicro X8STi-F motherboards with IPMI firmware 2.06 and BIOS 02.68, the Virtual Media feature allows OS Command Injection by authenticated attackers who can send HTTP requests to the IPMI IP address. This requires a POST to /rpc/setvmdrive.asp with shell metacharacters in ShareHost or ShareNa...
CVE-2019-19637
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-08
An issue was discovered in libsixel 1.8.2. There is an integer overflow in the function sixel_decode_raw_impl at fromsixel.c.
CVE-2019-19638
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-08
An issue was discovered in libsixel 1.8.2. There is a heap-based buffer overflow in the function load_pnm at frompnm.c, due to an integer overflow.
CVE-2019-19635
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-08
An issue was discovered in libsixel 1.8.2. There is a heap-based buffer overflow in the function sixel_decode_raw_impl at fromsixel.c.
CVE-2019-19636
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-08
An issue was discovered in libsixel 1.8.2. There is an integer overflow in the function sixel_encode_body at tosixel.c.