Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

DLP-DAM Convergence: Duh!

A DAM solution that can't identify sensitive content should get cut from your short list

4:28 PM -- In a recent article, analysts talk about how database activity monitoring (DAM) and data leakage prevention (DLP) are focused on security data, but that DAM needs to develop content awareness -- possibly leading to acquisitions of DAM vendors by larger vendors with DLP technology.

But the analysts’ views here are outdated. Most DAM vendors, like Guardium, Imperva, Application Security Inc., and Crossroads, have been around for a couple of years and have reached a level of maturity where they monitor not only database activity, but also the leakage of sensitive information. Approximately half of the vendors in the DAM market also have the capability of blocking leakage much like DLP solutions do.

A year ago when I reviewed DAM solutions, there wasn’t a common name for them. Some people referred to them as database monitoring solutions, database leakage protection, and database extrusion prevention. I liked the last term and stuck with it when reviewing five available solutions at the time. Each one took a similar approach of monitoring database activity -- by watching the database traffic on the network. Some of the DAM solutions included software that ran on the database server to provide a view into activity generated by the local database administrator.

The one thing that all the solutions had (except for one) was monitoring for sensitive data. They had the capability of identifying Social Security numbers and credit card numbers as they were transmitted over the wire. I’m of the mindset that if a DAM solution doesn’t have the capability to identify sensitive content, then you should mark it off your short list. It’s just one of those core features that makes a DAM solution worth having. Even if SSNs and CCs aren’t a concern for companies, most of the solutions allow administrators to define patterns to look for, notify, or block when seen.

– John H. Sawyer is a security geek on the IT Security Team at the University of Florida. He enjoys taking long war walks on the beach and riding pwnies. When he's not fighting flaming, malware-infested machines or performing autopsies on blitzed boxes, he can usually be found hanging with his family, bouncing a baby on one knee and balancing a laptop on the other. Special to Dark Reading

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Commentary
How SolarWinds Busted Up Our Assumptions About Code Signing
Dr. Jethro Beekman, Technical Director,  3/3/2021
News
'ObliqueRAT' Now Hides Behind Images on Compromised Websites
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  3/2/2021
News
Attackers Turn Struggling Software Projects Into Trojan Horses
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  2/26/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-18629
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-04
Xerox AltaLink B8045/B8055/B8065/B8075/B8090 and C8030/C8035/C8045/C8055/C8070 multifunction printers with software releases before 101.00x.099.28200 allow an attacker to execute an unwanted binary during a exploited clone install. This requires creating a clone file and signing that file with a com...
CVE-2019-18628
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-04
Xerox AltaLink B8045/B8055/B8065/B8075/B8090 and C8030/C8035/C8045/C8055/C8070 multifunction printers with software releases before 101.00x.099.28200 allow a user with administrative privileges to turn off data encryption on the device, thus leaving it open to potential cryptographic information dis...
CVE-2021-21331
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-03
The Java client for the Datadog API before version 1.0.0-beta.9 has a local information disclosure of sensitive information downloaded via the API using the API Client. The Datadog API is executed on a unix-like system with multiple users. The API is used to download a file containing sensitive info...
CVE-2021-27940
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-03
resources/public/js/orchestrator.js in openark orchestrator before 3.2.4 allows XSS via the orchestrator-msg parameter.
CVE-2021-21312
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-03
GLPI is open source software which stands for Gestionnaire Libre de Parc Informatique and it is a Free Asset and IT Management Software package. In GLPI before verison 9.5.4, there is a vulnerability within the document upload function (Home > Management > Documents > Add, or /front/documen...