Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

5/5/2010
10:51 AM
George V. Hulme
George V. Hulme
Commentary
50%
50%

A Decade Ago, ILoveYou Worm Changed Security

It's been a decade to the week since the infamous "Love Bug "or ILoveYou virus hammered in-boxes around the world. While mass-mailer viruses of this type don't make headlines anymore, the ILoveYou virus forever changed the face of IT security.

It's been a decade to the week since the infamous "Love Bug "or ILoveYou virus hammered in-boxes around the world. While mass-mailer viruses of this type don't make headlines anymore, the ILoveYou virus forever changed the face of IT security.On May 4, 2000 I woke to find nearly a dozen subject lines in my inbox that all read: ILOVEYOU. These e-mails came from industry analysts, security vendors, and PR people who must have been infected with the worm and clicked on the LOVE-LETTER-FOR-YOU.TXT.vbs attachment.

It was obvious something was awry, I just had no idea to what extent.

Within an hour, it became clear that one of the most devastating worm attacks ever was well underway. Sources at businesses I spoke with that morning across the U.S. and Europe reported having jammed E-mail servers. Many businesses and government agencies had to take their mail systems offline for a number of days for cleanup. The research firm Computer Economics estimated total costs to exceeded $5 billion.

The worm relied on users to click on the attachment to send itself to everyone listed in the infected users' Outlook address book. The worm leveraged, primarily, two weaknesses. One was how Microsoft parsed file names from right to left, stopping when the algorithm hit the first "dot." This made it easy for attackers just to add ".txt" to malicious files and to trick users into thinking the file was safe. The worm also relied on a scripting engine that Microsoft left on by default, and errors in how attachments could easy gain control to important aspects of the Windows operating system.

The ILoveYou worm hit about a year after the mass E-mail worm Melissa struck, but it wrought much more damage.

The ILoveYou attack is historically notable for a few reasons beyond its destruction:

First, businesses had become more dependent on e-mail, and it was the first computer virus that significantly disrupted productivity. The attention toward and spending on end-point antivirus tools skyrocketed after this worm struck. End-point security finally became recognized as being important.

Second, it was the beginning of the end of Microsoft's ability to put its head in the sand when it came to consistently adding new features and convenience with no regard to security. The world finally began to take seriously the fact that too many services within the Windows operating system and productivity suites were turned on by default. It'd take a few more embarrassing vulnerabilities and malware attacks, such as the 2001 Code Red and Nimda attacks to get Microsoft to take the warning seriously. But ILoveYou grabbed the entire world, for the first time, by the collar and forced it to take security seriously.

Third, The suspect was from the Philippines, and ILoveYou highlighted that cybercrime was indeed an international problem, and how crucial international law enforcement efforts would be in the years ahead.

Looking back, while we managed to better secure the operating system and E-mail, we've more than lost those gains to the insecurities of Web applications. And despite Microsoft's aggressive Secure Development Lifecycle, and the gains in application security they've made, the efforts haven't come far enough to significantly reduce end user risk. And not enough enterprise software vendors have followed Microsoft's lead in this area. As for international law efforts, there hasn't been much "love" given to those efforts, either.

For my security and technology observations throughout the day, consider following me on Twitter.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
I 'Hacked' My Accounts Using My Mobile Number: Here's What I Learned
Nicole Sette, Director in the Cyber Risk practice of Kroll, a division of Duff & Phelps,  11/19/2019
TPM-Fail: What It Means & What to Do About It
Ari Singer, CTO at TrustPhi,  11/19/2019
Ransomware Surge & Living-Off-the-Land Tactics Remain Big Threats
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  11/19/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-19227
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-22
In the AppleTalk subsystem in the Linux kernel before 5.1, there is a potential NULL pointer dereference because register_snap_client may return NULL. This will lead to denial of service in net/appletalk/aarp.c and net/appletalk/ddp.c, as demonstrated by unregister_snap_client, aka CID-9804501fa122.
CVE-2019-10203
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-22
PowerDNS Authoritative daemon , all versions pdns 4.1.x before pdns 4.1.10, exiting when encountering a serial between 2^31 and 2^32-1 while trying to notify a slave leads to DoS.
CVE-2019-10206
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-22
ansible-playbook -k and ansible cli tools, all versions 2.8.x before 2.8.4, all 2.7.x before 2.7.13 and all 2.6.x before 2.6.19, prompt passwords by expanding them from templates as they could contain special characters. Passwords should be wrapped to prevent templates trigger and exposing them.
CVE-2018-10854
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-22
cloudforms version, cloudforms 5.8 and cloudforms 5.9, is vulnerable to a cross-site-scripting. A flaw was found in CloudForms's v2v infrastructure mapping delete feature. A stored cross-site scripting due to improper sanitization of user input in Name field.
CVE-2019-13157
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-22
nsGreen.dll in Naver Vaccine 2.1.4 allows remote attackers to overwrite arbitary files via directory traversal sequences in a filename within nsz archive.