Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Physical Security

2/1/2021
02:45 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Increase in Physical Security Incidents Adds to IT Security Pressures

A new study shows that many organizations have changed their physical security strategies to address new concerns since the COVID-19 outbreak.

An increase in physical security incidents since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic may be adding to IT security teams' workloads at many organizations.

In a recent survey by Pro-Vigil, a provider of remote video-monitoring services, nearly 20% of 124 business operations leaders surveyed said their organizations had experienced more physical security incidents than the prior year. One-third said they believed they will see an increase in these incidents in 2021.

Related Content:

The Line Between Physical Security & Cybersecurity Blurs as World Gets More Digital

Special Report: 2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends

New From The Edge: FBI Encounters: Reporting an Insider Security Incident to the Feds

Concerns over physical security has prompted 40% of the organizations in the survey to make changes to their security strategy, including an increas in their use of video cameras and security guards, since the start of the pandemic.

Jeremy White, founder of Pro-Vigil, says some of the changes on the physical security front have a direct impact on IT security teams as well.

"The more physical security that we deploy, the greater the need for cybersecurity," he says.  

Organizations are aware of the cyber-risks associated with the digital technologies that are increasingly being deployed for physical security and often have strict IT security requirements when deploying them, White says.

"IT security organizations are primarily responsible these days for the deployment and management of not only digital camera systems, but also IP-based access control and many other related products and services," he says.

Pro-Vigil's findings are similar to those of a study the Ontic Center for Protective Intelligence commissioned last year. The latter study found many organizations were planning to increase budgets for physical security in 2021 because of COVID-19-related concerns. Forty-three percent of the respondents in the Ontic commissioned study said keeping remote employees safe was a challenge, and 36% said the same of their ability to secure physical access to corporate data. Thirty-five percent expressed concern over reduced physical security headcount as a result of the economy, 33% said managing physical threat data was a challenge, and 32% were worried about physical security threats to company leadership and members of the C-suite.

The Ontic survey also revealed a high-level of concern over threats to business continuity from physical security breaches. Sixty-nine percent of respondents said they expected their organizations would experience irrecoverable financial and reputational damage if a fatality were to occur as the result of a missed security threat. Just as with cybersecurity, 39% of the respondents in Ontic’s study said COVID-19 had caused them to accelerate plans to modernize their physical security capabilities. Ninety-one percent felt that a technology-driven industry standard was essential for identifying, investigating, and managing physical security issues.

White says IT teams often have control over the procurement of physical security. As a result, there is a growing need for the IT and physical security teams to work hand-in-hand to ensure physical security technologies are deployed correctly and operate efficiently.

"It's a shift from physical security management in the past," he notes. "As physical security has shifted from an analog offering into a more advanced IP-based or digital solution, the greater the requirement for both physical security to learn more about IT and for IT to learn more about physical security."

The convergence between IT and physical security has been in the making for several years, but it has accelerated recently due to the adoption of the Internet of Things (IoT) and increasingly sophisticated industrial IoT devices at many organizations. Nearly half of the respondents in the Pro-Vigil study, for instance, said they are using modern digital video systems with artificial intelligence (AI) for object recognition.

According to the US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), the trend has "led to an increasingly interconnected mesh of cyber-physical systems (CPS), which expands the attack surface and blurs the once clear functions of cybersecurity and physical security."

According to the agency, an organization's cyber and physical assets together represent a significant risk. "Each can be targeted, separately or simultaneously, to result in compromised systems and/or infrastructure," it says.

Jai Vijayan is a seasoned technology reporter with over 20 years of experience in IT trade journalism. He was most recently a Senior Editor at Computerworld, where he covered information security and data privacy issues for the publication. Over the course of his 20-year ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Visit the Web's Most Authoritative Resource on Physical Security

To get the latest news and analysis on threats, vulnerabilities, and best practices for enterprise physical security, please visit IFSEC Global. IFSEC Global offers expert insight on critical issues and challenges in physical security, and hosts one of the world's most widely-attended conferences for physical security professionals.

News
Former CISA Director Chris Krebs Discusses Risk Management & Threat Intel
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  2/23/2021
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
Security + Fraud Protection: Your One-Two Punch Against Cyberattacks
Joshua Goldfarb, Director of Product Management at F5,  2/23/2021
News
Cybercrime Groups More Prolific, Focus on Healthcare in 2020
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  2/22/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Building the SOC of the Future
Building the SOC of the Future
Digital transformation, cloud-focused attacks, and a worldwide pandemic. The past year has changed the way business works and the way security teams operate. There is no going back.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-8032
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-25
A Insecure Temporary File vulnerability in the packaging of cyrus-sasl of openSUSE Factory allows local attackers to escalate to root. This issue affects: openSUSE Factory cyrus-sasl version 2.1.27-4.2 and prior versions.
CVE-2020-36254
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-25
scp.c in Dropbear before 2020.79 mishandles the filename of . or an empty filename, a related issue to CVE-2018-20685.
CVE-2021-27670
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-25
Appspace 6.2.4 allows SSRF via the api/v1/core/proxy/jsonprequest url parameter.
CVE-2021-27671
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-25
An issue was discovered in the comrak crate before 0.9.1 for Rust. XSS can occur because the protection mechanism for data: and javascript: URIs is case-sensitive, allowing (for example) Data: to be used in an attack.
CVE-2020-9051
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-24
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none.