Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Partner Perspectives  Connecting marketers to our tech communities.
SPONSORED BY
1/9/2017
10:50 AM
Malwarebytes Labs
Malwarebytes Labs
Partner Perspectives
50%
50%

Online Or Offline, Ransomware Will Find You

The current threat landscape is a mish-mash of online ransomware, offline ransomware, and those that are a mixture of the two.

Professional ransomware authors typically use online Command & Control centers for their campaigns as they provide multiple benefits, including the ability to track affiliate campaigns, use unique keys created for victims, and alter campaign specifics on the fly. The old "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" method has served them well for the longest time, but everything has to change eventually, and even malware makers have to adapt with the times.

The reason for this shift in attack strategy is that not all computers are online, which represents a blip in the ability of bad actors to make as much money as humanly possible.

If ransomware can't “phone home” when it's time to begin infecting the target, then no encryption can take place and their efforts are wasted. To get around this, it's becoming more common to see offline features built into more traditional packages. As a result, offline ransomware is becoming a solid and popular alternative, even if it is a little limiting in some circumstances as we'll discuss later.

A major player that recently included offline functionality in its ransomware is the infamous Zepto. This ransomware, which typically arrives in a Zip attachment via a rogue email, renames all infected files to .zepto and demands an expensive ransom be paid should the victim be unfortunate enough to execute the file.

Zepto, which is a Locky variant, has been causing problems for some time now with its default setup, but it only recently made the leap into the world of offline infection.

What if the victim drops offline or attempts to pull the plug before it's too late? No problem -- Zepto can work around it, thanks to hardcoded RSA keys, which means there's no need to contact the C&C server. Zepto even goes after files it considers to be most valuable first, such as those related to virtual wallets and .doc files, over other potentially less important files in a determined effort to make the victim pay up as fast possible.

The current threat landscape is a mish-mash of online ransomware, offline ransomware, and those that are a mixture of the two.

To be clear, it's debatable whether fully offline ransomware is "better" than families that make use of C&C servers. Many ransomware authors try to combine both approaches, using offline as a sort of fallback for when the more typical infection opportunity isn't viable.

Do-it-yourself ransomware is a huge attraction for script kiddies, and the complex setup that we see from the professionals is often beyond them. Giving up the day job of having to worry about C&C servers and complex distributed management means creators get to fly a little lower under the radar from law enforcement and security researchers, so this is naturally an attractive proposition for them.

The flipside is that many files "inspired" by the likes of Zepto and others tend to be broken or use predefined keys, which means someone who pays can share their unlock code(s) with others. Combine that with the inability to track a campaign's success, and a would-be ransomware author is missing valuable tools to learn and move up the ranks, leaving the field to the big players churning out hundreds of thousands of infected emails.

Combining a layered approach to security with a solid and logical backup system ensures that the impact from an outbreak will be thwarted. With ransomware profits expected to hit $1 billion this year, there's never been a better time to take action -- whether online or off.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
SOC 2s & Third-Party Assessments: How to Prevent Them from Being Used in a Data Breach Lawsuit
Beth Burgin Waller, Chair, Cybersecurity & Data Privacy Practice , Woods Rogers PLC,  12/5/2019
Deliver a Deadly Counterpunch to Ransomware Attacks: 4 Steps
Mathew Newfield, Chief Information Security Officer at Unisys,  12/10/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: Our Endpoint Protection system is a little outdated... 
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-19604
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-11
Arbitrary command execution is possible in Git before 2.20.2, 2.21.x before 2.21.1, 2.22.x before 2.22.2, 2.23.x before 2.23.1, and 2.24.x before 2.24.1 because a "git submodule update" operation can run commands found in the .gitmodules file of a malicious repository.
CVE-2019-14861
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-10
All Samba versions 4.x.x before 4.9.17, 4.10.x before 4.10.11 and 4.11.x before 4.11.3 have an issue, where the (poorly named) dnsserver RPC pipe provides administrative facilities to modify DNS records and zones. Samba, when acting as an AD DC, stores DNS records in LDAP. In AD, the default permiss...
CVE-2019-14870
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-10
All Samba versions 4.x.x before 4.9.17, 4.10.x before 4.10.11 and 4.11.x before 4.11.3 have an issue, where the S4U (MS-SFU) Kerberos delegation model includes a feature allowing for a subset of clients to be opted out of constrained delegation in any way, either S4U2Self or regular Kerberos authent...
CVE-2019-14889
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-10
A flaw was found with the libssh API function ssh_scp_new() in versions before 0.9.3 and before 0.8.8. When the libssh SCP client connects to a server, the scp command, which includes a user-provided path, is executed on the server-side. In case the library is used in a way where users can influence...
CVE-2019-1484
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-10
A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Microsoft Windows OLE fails to properly validate user input, aka 'Windows OLE Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'.