Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Operations

9/22/2016
01:00 PM
Will Ackerly
Will Ackerly
Commentary
Connect Directly
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail vvv
100%
0%

Snowden: Hollywood Highlights 2 Persistent Privacy Threats

Oliver Stone's movie shows us that while most of us have nothing to hide, we all have information worth protecting - both technically and constitutionally.

Much has already been written about the new Snowden movie directed by Oliver Stone and its inaccuracies and exaggerations. However, the hype does underscore two persistent vulnerabilities, technical and constitutional, which represent serious threats to our privacy. Since we can still take action on both, I’d like to examine them here.

For some of us, like Edward Snowden’s girlfriend in the movie, vulnerability of our data can seem vague and generalized. In Snowden, the technical vulnerabilities are acutely personalized. With a click of a button and entry of someone (else’s) email address, live webcam video and intimate personal messages are seemingly available on-demand. The reality is actually scarier than the movie makes it out to be. Our information is exposed to a massive spectrum of threats, and vulnerable to malicious actors, security holes, and incompetence. An email, for instance, could be compromised by your email provider, your recipient’s email provider, your Internet provider, your cloud provider, your government, foreign governments, or hackers.

Given the spectrum of threats, the only reliable response is to stop depending on the myriad devices and services that store our data and start making our data self-protecting. This is not a totally new concept; it can be achieved with existing technology like end-to-end encryption. End-to-end encryption ensures only you and your authorized recipients may have access to your content so that you do not need to trust devices and service providers in between. It is a technical means of embedding the kind of principle we have written in law to protect the US Mail (no snooping!) and into the DNA of our data online. While traditionally difficult to use, new approaches to self-protecting, data-centric security are becoming it easier to add to existing apps.

Stone’s movie also hit on the biggest legal vulnerability threatening our constitutional rights: secret laws being written that avoid the critical checks and balances of the American system of balance of powers.

One key source of these secret threats is the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) court system, which issues secret rulings that can function as secret law. While Congress may have rightly understood that many aspects of intelligence gathering and judicial oversight must be kept secret –  including warrants that can reveal sources, methods, and targets –  there was an unintended consequence.  Under this framework, the FISA court can grant new authorities via secret court opinion, constituting new law not subject to public scrutiny.

As we now know, without public scrutiny and an adversarial judicial process, these rulings have been demonstrated to violate common assumptions about Constitutional protections provided by the Fourth Amendment. For instance, a 2013 New York Times article revealed that the FISA court determined that collections of data on any American, regardless of connection to foreign enemies, did not violate the Fourth Amendment search and seizure protections.

This legal threat persists today. Some laws have changed, but our information remains exposed. This may seem like an intractable problem: trying to ensure transparency of law while maintaining operational security of our national defense. But there is a solution.

The solution will require an act of Congress mandating that secret rulings made by courts or agencies must include a public, unclassified summary of any legal interpretations made in granting a warrant or issuing a ruling. This can be done without revealing sensitive sources, methods, or targets.

Perhaps the most chilling theme in the movie revolves around potential misuse of surveillance powers by future leaders. In January, we will have a new administration, and our new president will drive his or her agenda on surveillance. Without legal reform and transparency, we will not know how our privacy rights have changed – for the better or the worse.  In the meantime, let us make sure our data carries its own protection, end to end, so it is protected regardless of what others do.

As Stone’s movie makes clear, while most of us have “nothing to hide,” we all have information worth protecting.

Edward Snowden will be speaking via video link at the SecTor security conference in Toronto at 9 a.m. ET on Tuesday October 18, and will be taking questions from Dark Reading readers. If you have relevant questions you would like to ask, let the SecTor team know by posting them in the comments section at the bottom of this article. SecTor will be selecting the best to be addressed at the event.

Related Content:

 

Will Ackerly is the chief technology officer and cofounder of Virtru. Prior to founding Virtru in 2012, Will spent eight years at the National Security Agency (NSA) where he specialized in cloud analytic and security architecture - specifically protecting the agency's ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
Souheil.M
50%
50%
Souheil.M,
User Rank: Apprentice
9/23/2016 | 11:14:50 AM
A good read on Snowden case !
I hope this film will be providing a real opportunity for Snwoden to be pardoned and more comprehension of what he has done !

Anyway, this article is a good point to explain that we can't sacrifce our own privacy in the name of whatever reason !. In addition, I think this kind of intelligence practice will very likely continue to exist...
jries921
50%
50%
jries921,
User Rank: Ninja
9/24/2016 | 10:40:45 AM
Re: A good read on Snowden case !
Frankly, I don't know enough to ask for his pardon, which is why I will not sign any petitions requesting it.  Specifically, I don't know what damage he has done to our defense, intelligence, or diplomatic efforts, if any; I don't know what information he has given to the Russian authorities, if any (he denies that he has, but I can't imagine President Putin granting him asylum without his having been thoroughly interrogated by a couple of the FSB's finest); and I don't know what there is in the cache that hasn't been publicly reported (and there really isn't any way to secure what is still in Glenn Greenwald's custody).  Admittedly, he has exposed real abuses and provoked a badly needed public debate, but we, the general public have no good way of knowing what the downside was.

If I were President, I wouldn't even think about granting him a pardon until/unless I had a very good idea of what the negative consequences were, and unless the entire contents of the cache were transmitted to the National Security Council staff (so I and the appropriate agencies would know exactly what was leaked, not just what Greenwald has chosen to release).  Then I'd need to have some very long conversations with my Secretaries of State, Defense, and Homeland Security; and with my Director of National Intelligence and probably a remote conversation with Snowden as well (he could be granted safe conduct to and from the US Embassy in Moscow for that purpose).  Only then do I think I would have enough information to make a decision.

In the mean time, I prefer to withhold judgment.  I don't really like deferring to the President, but I don't see much of a choice.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
9/24/2016 | 5:07:37 PM
Re: A good read on Snowden case !
"... he general public have no good way of knowing what the downside was. ..."

Agree. We are only hearing what is reported. We do not understand the dynamics I believe.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
9/24/2016 | 5:01:31 PM
Re: A good read on Snowden case !
"... we can't sacrifice our own privacy ..."

I hear you. Privacy will likely be less of an issue in near future, we already give up privacy by being in the Facebook and when we start using tools available to us, more like security is the main concern.
Souheil.M
50%
50%
Souheil.M,
User Rank: Apprentice
9/26/2016 | 6:24:51 AM
Re: A good read on Snowden case !
Yes you're right.  However, I would say when using social media networks you are giving them some "private" information somehow,  but all depends on how the privacy is defined according to the Law. Anyway the question is very complex.

 
jries921
100%
0%
jries921,
User Rank: Ninja
9/24/2016 | 10:18:29 AM
Secret law
Technically, there is no such thing, but in Common Law jurisdictions like the USA, judicial precedents have something akin to the force of law, so they must be taken into consideration.  I think there are some things Congress can do to help matters:

1.  Strip FISC of its status as a court of record (meaning that its decisions could not be cited as precedent).  This would mean that FISC decisions would be guided entirely by publicly available statute law and appellate court rulings, not by its own precedents.

2.  Abolish the appellate court established by FISA (which has AFAIK, has only considered a handful of cases since it was established in 1979) and transfer appellate jurisdiction over FISC to the Federal Circuit, which would publish digests of its opinions dealing with cases appealed from FISC in the manner suggested in the article (opinions would be completely declassified when secrecy is no longer required; perhaps after 10 years by default, with the President having authority to extend the period up to five years at a time for a given case).  Cases could be further appealed to the Supreme Court in the usual manner.

A third item could probably only be done by order of the President, but I think it would help enormously:

3.  Make all legal opinions issued by the Justice Department for the general guidance of federal employees public record.  Advice on specific cases would continue to be confidential.  This would help to allay the suspicion that the Federal government is operating on the basis of secret rules, rather than publicly available statute and judicial precedents.

A fourth item could probably be done by act of Congress:

4.  Require any settlements of civil cases in which the US government or its civil officers (in their official capacities) are defendants to be made public record.  This would eliminate a category of "secret law" in the form of confidential consent decrees, which are sometimes alleged to govern federal policy in a number of areas, such as environmental protection.  Settlements of cases in which the federal government is the plaintiff and one or more private citizens are defendants could be partly or completely sealed by a court if it decides that such is necessary to protect privacy.

I suspect that others have other ideas.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
9/24/2016 | 5:05:07 PM
Re: Secret law
I agree. These are all good points, NSA is not operating under a secret law, these would most likely not solve ultimate problem. Also, it is not only US, other countries' information agencies performing secret services of course.
willackerly
100%
0%
willackerly,
User Rank: Author
9/30/2016 | 1:36:37 PM
Re: Secret law
jries921, that is a really thoughtful response, and those are fantastic ideas.  I think there are still real opportunities to make progress on these issues, and I'm pursuing one in particular, so it would be great to connect directly. If you're interested, give me a shout on email – accessible via my author profile
masoodm
50%
50%
masoodm,
User Rank: Apprentice
9/24/2016 | 10:24:32 AM
Snowden: Hollywood Highlights 2 Persistent Privacy Threats
My question to Snowden is that after exposure, to what extent the IT sector had taken real-time challenges on privacy threats.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
9/24/2016 | 4:58:29 PM
Misuse of data
 

I would not consider a potential, if you have data nobody else has you would use it for your benefits, that is main reason you made the effort to get it. Better not to allow anybody have any data exclusively.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
9/24/2016 | 5:09:29 PM
World with no secrecy
 

Another way of getting rid of this complex situation is not to have secret data, if everything is open to everybody then we will not have this madness and no need to play hide and seek game. Not realistic but it would be perfect if it happens. 
Whoopty
50%
50%
Whoopty,
User Rank: Ninja
9/26/2016 | 7:34:32 AM
Re: World with no secrecy
While I am concerned with the way that the world is moving in terms of personal privacy, this is the silver lining I am secretly hoping for. A world with no privacy is one I don't want to come to pass, but if it does, it needs to be an open book for everyone. If there are some with privacy while everyone is without, that gives enormous power to a select few who can keep their skeletons hidden.

However I am not optimistic. Privelege like that has traditionally been one rule for many and another for a few and it seems likely to continue.
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 9/17/2020
Cybersecurity Bounces Back, but Talent Still Absent
Simone Petrella, Chief Executive Officer, CyberVista,  9/16/2020
Meet the Computer Scientist Who Helped Push for Paper Ballots
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  9/16/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
The COVID-19 pandemic turned the world -- and enterprise computing -- on end. Here's a look at how cybersecurity teams are retrenching their defense strategies, rebuilding their teams, and selecting new technologies to stop the oncoming rise of online attacks.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-5421
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-19
In Spring Framework versions 5.2.0 - 5.2.8, 5.1.0 - 5.1.17, 5.0.0 - 5.0.18, 4.3.0 - 4.3.28, and older unsupported versions, the protections against RFD attacks from CVE-2015-5211 may be bypassed depending on the browser used through the use of a jsessionid path parameter.
CVE-2020-8225
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-18
A cleartext storage of sensitive information in Nextcloud Desktop Client 2.6.4 gave away information about used proxies and their authentication credentials.
CVE-2020-8237
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-18
Prototype pollution in json-bigint npm package < 1.0.0 may lead to a denial-of-service (DoS) attack.
CVE-2020-8245
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-18
Improper Input Validation on Citrix ADC and Citrix Gateway 13.0 before 13.0-64.35, Citrix ADC and NetScaler Gateway 12.1 before 12.1-58.15, Citrix ADC 12.1-FIPS before 12.1-55.187, Citrix ADC and NetScaler Gateway 12.0, Citrix ADC and NetScaler Gateway 11.1 before 11.1-65.12, Citrix SD-WAN WANOP 11....
CVE-2020-8246
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-18
Citrix ADC and Citrix Gateway 13.0 before 13.0-64.35, Citrix ADC and NetScaler Gateway 12.1 before 12.1-58.15, Citrix ADC 12.1-FIPS before 12.1-55.187, Citrix ADC and NetScaler Gateway 12.0, Citrix ADC and NetScaler Gateway 11.1 before 11.1-65.12, Citrix SD-WAN WANOP 11.2 before 11.2.1a, Citrix SD-W...