Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Operations

8/28/2017
05:00 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

New York's Historic FinSec Regulation Covers DDoS, Not Just Data

Starting today, New York banks and insurers must report to authorities within 72 hours on any security event that has a 'reasonable likelihood' of causing material harm to normal operations.

As of today, banks, insurers, and other financial services companies in the state of New York must officially report the kind of cybersecurity incidents that until now most organizations have been able to sweep under the carpet.

The new rules will apply to entities covered by the New York Department of Financial Services' (DFS) new cybersecurity regulation, 23 NYCRR 500, which officially went into effect in March, but hit its first compliance deadline today.

Under 23 NYCRR 500, covered entities must report to the DFS Superintendent within 72 hours any cybersecurity incidents "that have a reasonable likelihood of materially harming any material part of the normal operation of the Covered Entity." 

The regulation does not state under what conditions, if any, an incident needs to be reported to law enforcement, customers, or to the general public. "The regulation specifically relates to the authority that DFS has over its regulated entities. A regulated entity may have other reporting obligations depending on the facts and circumstances, " a DFS spokesperson said.

The regulation requires covered entities to report any incident covered by other regulations as well - therefore, a bank that suffers a PII breach that triggered a PCI violation would also now need to tell DFS.   

More importantly, the new rules would capture many of the significant cybersecurity incidents that currently go uncatalogued and unreported because they are not covered by any formal regulation. Disruptions and denials of service caused by WannaCry, NotPetya, Mirai, or the recent attacks on the SWIFT network, for example, would now be covered (as well as smaller incidents that do not make their way into the news cycle).

However, 23 NYCRR 500 extends beyond operational damage. Any cybersecurity incident that could materially damage the business - like a BEC fraud that cost millions of dollars or an intellectual property theft that jeopardizes the company's market advantage - must also be reported, a DFS representative confirmed. 

Last month, DFS launched a new online portal for reporting incidents. Businesses covered by the regulation must also submit to the Superintendent an annual compliance report, due Feb. 15 each year.

The regulation is the first of its kind in the US. It officially went into effect in March with a series of compliance deadlines staged over two years. Today marks the end of the first transitional period. 

As of today, covered organizations must have a cybersecurity program, a cybersecurity policy, a chief information security officer (who could be employed by either the covered entity or a third party), a security incident response plan, and a process to begin limiting user access priviliges. They also must begin reporting incidents.

By March 2018, covered entities must complete a full infosec risk assessment, conduct penetration testing, conduct end-user awareness training, issue an annual cybersecurity report to internal board-level management, and as a risk assessment deems fit, deploy multi-factor authentication. The regulation specifically calls out multi-factor authentication for any individual accessing internal networks from an external network, unless the CISO has approved reasonably equivalent or more secure controls.

More deadlines hit in September 2018. Organizations will need a secure application development program in place for in-house apps and a process for assessing security of commercial software. This is also when processes for maintaining adequate audit trails (some for at least three years, others for at least five years) data retention, end-user monitoring and data encryption must be in place.

The final piece comes in March 2019, two years after the initial enactment of the regulation, when covered entities must have a third-party service provider security policy. The policy must include due diligence when selecting providers, contractional protections with each third party, and minimum cybersecurity baseline requirements for each third party, including use of access controls and encryption.   

See the full text of 23 NYCRR 500 at DFS.ny.gov.

Learn from the industry’s most knowledgeable CISOs and IT security experts in a setting that is conducive to interaction and conversation. Click for more info and to register.

Related Content:

 

Sara Peters is Senior Editor at Dark Reading and formerly the editor-in-chief of Enterprise Efficiency. Prior that she was senior editor for the Computer Security Institute, writing and speaking about virtualization, identity management, cybersecurity law, and a myriad ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
romeo999
50%
50%
romeo999,
User Rank: Apprentice
5/27/2020 | 5:10:30 AM
Re: Step in the right direction
we have changed our comment system to block all posts that include URLs. We are seeking a longer-term solution that would allow for URLs. 
NicolaiBezsonoff
50%
50%
NicolaiBezsonoff,
User Rank: Author
9/11/2017 | 2:44:32 PM
Step in the right direction
This is a step in the right direction in terms of providing transparency for consumers. Our research shows that organizations of all sizes are getting hit with DDoS attacks, increasing the likelihood that all kinds of financial services firms will be targets. The good news is that these firms are becoming more prepared to mitigate these kinds of attacks, so they do not cause the significant downtime they have caused in the past. 
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 5/28/2020
Stay-at-Home Orders Coincide With Massive DNS Surge
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  5/27/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
How Cybersecurity Incident Response Programs Work (and Why Some Don't)
This Tech Digest takes a look at the vital role cybersecurity incident response (IR) plays in managing cyber-risk within organizations. Download the Tech Digest today to find out how well-planned IR programs can detect intrusions, contain breaches, and help an organization restore normal operations.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-11844
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
There is an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Micro Focus Service Management Automation (SMA) product affecting version 2018.05 to 2020.02. The vulnerability could be exploited to provide unauthorized access to the Container Deployment Foundation.
CVE-2020-6937
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
A Denial of Service vulnerability in MuleSoft Mule CE/EE 3.8.x, 3.9.x, and 4.x released before April 7, 2020, could allow remote attackers to submit data which can lead to resource exhaustion.
CVE-2020-7648
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
All versions of snyk-broker before 4.72.2 are vulnerable to Arbitrary File Read. It allows arbitrary file reads for users who have access to Snyk's internal network by appending the URL with a fragment identifier and a whitelisted path e.g. `#package.json`
CVE-2020-7650
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
All versions of snyk-broker after 4.72.0 including and before 4.73.1 are vulnerable to Arbitrary File Read. It allows arbitrary file reads to users with access to Snyk's internal network of any files ending in the following extensions: yaml, yml or json.
CVE-2020-7654
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
All versions of snyk-broker before 4.73.1 are vulnerable to Information Exposure. It logs private keys if logging level is set to DEBUG.