Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Operations

4/20/2016
11:00 AM
Jeff Schilling
Jeff Schilling
Commentary
Connect Directly
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail vvv
50%
50%

Internal Pen-Testing: Not Just For Compliance Audits Anymore

How turning your internal penetration team into a 'Friendly Network Force' can identify and shut down the cracks in your security program.

When evaluating or building a security operations program, one of my first steps is to ensure that a Friendly Network Forces (FNF) function is in place. I wish I could take credit for creating this concept. Readers with US Department of Defense backgrounds will recognize the nomenclature, commonly referred to as FNF or Blue Teams.  

What is FNF?

For most non-technical audiences, I describe FNF as internal penetration teams, but they do so much more. A sound FNF team will:

  • Search for gaps and seams through both internal and external penetration testing
  • Provide surveillance on critical portions of an enterprise that sophisticated threat actors will try to leverage 
  •  “Shake the door knobs” on security controls and devices to ensure they are working as they should (e.g. are those access controls really in place between segmented VLANs?)
  • Conduct proofs-of-concept (POCs) on zero-day or globally known vulnerabilities to see if an environment is vulnerable
  • Conduct insider threat surveillance

To truly gain the most of out these roles, it’s vital to look for certain attributes and skillsets.

For me, it is really simple. Team members must have extensive knowledge of how an enterprise environment is designed and possess a strong understanding of the most critical gaps and vulnerabilities. In fact, one of Armor’s FNF team members is one of our first employees, so he is someone who has a long history with the environment and understands each any every dark corner. It’s that important.

Understanding Threat Actors

FNF professionals should have the experience and contextual understanding of how real cyber threat actors target and attack their victims. There are great courses — the SANS-certified Network Penetration & Ethical Hacker course comes to mind — that provide solid foundations for this knowledge base. 

However, experience in leveraging this knowledge to penetrate networks is a difficult skill for potential FNF team members to acquire. Normally, you can’t apply this knowledge without facing legal or ethical ramifications.

That’s why alumni from national-level intelligence agencies or security consultants, who have worked as both close and remote access penetration testers, make great resources as do former incident response and forensics investigators.

Strong Moral Compass

Members of the team must be of high moral character. This might sound corny and obvious to some, but it is very important that members of the FNF team are very discreet in their activities and can be trusted with the highest levels of access within an organization. 

These teams watch everyone. They look for any and all anomalous activity — from the front-desk admin to the greater security team to the CSO. It’s even a good idea to include them on HR situations where an employee could be an insider threat. 

I am confident that if my FNF discovered that my laptop was compromised, they would have the authority and moral courage to let me and the CEO know that I screwed up. That is the litmus test for every member of our FNF team. This type of character and visibility should be present in every organization.  

More Than ‘Testers’

FNF teams are more than just internal pen-testers. When employed correctly, they will identify and shut down the cracks and seams in your security program. They will validate that your security operations team is doing what they say they are doing. And they will lock in on any unscrupulous, suspicious or erratic behavior within your organization.

I can’t imagine a mature security organization NOT having an FNF team. That is, unless they are afraid to know the truth. But as high-profile breaches have proven, this strategic ignorance will not prevent consequences. It only exacerbates them.

Gain insight into the latest threats and emerging best practices for managing them. Attend the Security Track at Interop Las Vegas, May 2-6. Register now!

Jeff Schilling, a retired U.S. Army colonel, is Armor's chief security officer. He is responsible for the cyber and physical security programs for the corporate environment and customer-focused capabilities. His areas of responsibilities include security operation, governance ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
News
FluBot Malware's Rapid Spread May Soon Hit US Phones
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  4/28/2021
Slideshows
7 Modern-Day Cybersecurity Realities
Steve Zurier, Contributing Writer,  4/30/2021
Commentary
How to Secure Employees' Home Wi-Fi Networks
Bert Kashyap, CEO and Co-Founder at SecureW2,  4/28/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-36124
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-07
Pax Technology PAXSTORE v7.0.8_20200511171508 and lower is affected by XML External Entity (XXE) injection. An authenticated attacker can compromise the private keys of a JWT token and reuse them to manipulate the access tokens to access the platform as any desired user (clients and administrators).
CVE-2020-36125
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-07
Pax Technology PAXSTORE v7.0.8_20200511171508 and lower is affected by incorrect access control where password revalidation in sensitive operations can be bypassed remotely by an authenticated attacker through requesting the endpoint directly.
CVE-2020-36126
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-07
Pax Technology PAXSTORE v7.0.8_20200511171508 and lower is affected by incorrect access control that can lead to remote privilege escalation. PAXSTORE marketplace endpoints allow an authenticated user to read and write data not owned by them, including third-party users, application and payment term...
CVE-2020-36127
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-07
Pax Technology PAXSTORE v7.0.8_20200511171508 and lower is affected by an information disclosure vulnerability. Through the PUK signature functionality, an administrator will not have access to the current p12 certificate and password. When accessing this functionality, the administrator has the opt...
CVE-2020-36128
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-07
Pax Technology PAXSTORE v7.0.8_20200511171508 and lower is affected by a token spoofing vulnerability. Each payment terminal has a session token (called X-Terminal-Token) to access the marketplace. This allows the store to identify the terminal and make available the applications distributed by its ...