Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

News

9/24/2014
04:35 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Jimmy John's Gourmet Sandwiches POS Systems Hacked

Sandwich chain is the latest data breach victim, with credit and debit card data breached in 216 of its restaurants.

Count Jimmy John's as the latest data breach victim falling to a point-of-sale malware attack.

The sandwich chain today confirmed that 216 of its restaurants had been hit with an attack that began back in June, exposing its customers' credit and debit card information at those locations. The company said it hired third-party forensics experts to investigate a possible breach it first learned of on July 30.

According to Jimmy John's, the breach originated from stolen log-in credentials pilfered from its POS vendor, and encrypted POS swipe terminals have now been installed in stores.

The company said in a statement issued today:

While the investigation is ongoing, it appears that customers’ credit and debit card data was compromised after an intruder stole log-in credentials from Jimmy John’s point-of-sale vendor and used these stolen credentials to remotely access the point-of-sale systems at some corporate and franchised locations between June 16, 2014 and September 5, 2014. The security compromise has been contained, and customers can use their credit and debit cards securely at Jimmy John’s stores.

Only payment cards that were swiped into POS terminals at those stores were exposed, not cards that were entered online or manually. Among the information exposed: card account numbers, cardholder names, verification codes, and expiration dates.

"Jimmy John’s has taken steps to prevent this type of event from occurring in the future, including installing encrypted swipe machines, implementing system enhancements, and reviewing its policies and procedures for its third party vendors," the chain said.

The company says the malware has been removed from its network. It's offering identity protection services to affected customers. The list of affected restaurant locations is here.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Some Consultant
50%
50%
Some Consultant,
User Rank: Apprentice
9/25/2014 | 12:57:57 PM
Easier to wait for the incident and then pay
The way this works is the classic "show me the money" fashion. Security costs money and it is seen (until a breach happens) as an unneeded expense. Another common "modus operandi" we find here is to use a relaxed vendor to gain access to your infrastructure (do you remember Target?). It seems to me that paying with cash will become the way payment in America. 
Kelly Jackson Higgins
100%
0%
Kelly Jackson Higgins,
User Rank: Strategist
9/25/2014 | 11:25:28 AM
Re: Once again..
Note that Jimmy John's response is that it now has installed encrypted POS terminals in the stores. 
aws0513
50%
50%
aws0513,
User Rank: Ninja
9/25/2014 | 9:38:37 AM
Listing of stores is a good response tactic
As much as it saddens me to see another POS compromise victim, the way Jimmy Johns is responding to the compromise is commendable.  To provide a list of affected stores demonstrates a willingness to engage their customers even in the worst of situations. 
Of course, one would have to trust the provided list is accurate.
securityaffairs
50%
50%
securityaffairs,
User Rank: Ninja
9/25/2014 | 6:53:17 AM
Once again..
Once again POS system exposed, security in retailer world is an optional and recent cases demonstrate it. It's time to completely change the approach to security to avoid a dramatic domino effect.

Such incidents expose users to financial losses, but also to identity theft risk and the worrying aspect is that in the majority of cases the data breached go undetected for months.
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 5/22/2020
How an Industry Consortium Can Reinvent Security Solution Testing
Henry Harrison, Co-founder & Chief Technology Officer, Garrison,  5/21/2020
Is Zero Trust the Best Answer to the COVID-19 Lockdown?
Dan Blum, Cybersecurity & Risk Management Strategist,  5/20/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
How Cybersecurity Incident Response Programs Work (and Why Some Don't)
This Tech Digest takes a look at the vital role cybersecurity incident response (IR) plays in managing cyber-risk within organizations. Download the Tech Digest today to find out how well-planned IR programs can detect intrusions, contain breaches, and help an organization restore normal operations.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-13616
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-26
The boost ASIO wrapper in net/asio.cpp in Pichi before 1.3.0 lacks TLS hostname verification.
CVE-2020-13614
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-26
An issue was discovered in ssl.c in Axel before 2.17.8. The TLS implementation lacks hostname verification.
CVE-2020-13615
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-26
lib/QoreSocket.cpp in Qore before 0.9.4.2 lacks hostname verification for X.509 certificates.
CVE-2020-9046
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-26
A vulnerability in all versions of Kantech EntraPass Editions could potentially allow an authorized low-privileged user to gain full system-level privileges by replacing critical files with specifically crafted files.
CVE-2020-12388
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-26
The Firefox content processes did not sufficiently lockdown access control which could result in a sandbox escape. *Note: this issue only affects Firefox on Windows operating systems.*. This vulnerability affects Firefox ESR < 68.8 and Firefox < 76.