Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Analytics

11/1/2007
04:06 AM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Have You Got the Winning Bug?

iDefense contest offers up to $12,000 for security bug plus exploit code

This time, email is the target: iDefense this week issued its latest quarterly vulnerability challenge to hackers, and this time it's looking for new remote code execution bugs in specific email clients and servers.

The contest focuses on the most popular email packages, including Microsoft Outlook, Mozilla Thunderbird, Microsoft Outlook Express, Sendmail SMTP daemon, and Microsoft Exchange Server.

iDefense's previous zero-day bug-hunting contest gave out awards for bugs in core Internet and intranet applications. (See iDefense Offers Bucks for New Bugs.) The email bug challenge offers between $8,000 and $12,000 -– the winning submission gets $8,000, plus another $1,000 to $4,000 for proof-of-concept exploit code, depending on the reliability and quality of the POC.

Critics say bug contests are more a marketing ploy, and don't always yield quality research, but iDefense contends that it practices responsible disclosure, and alerts both the affected vendor and its customers simultaneously of a new zero-day.

The vulnerability must be for the latest (and fully patched) version of the designated email products, must be remotely exploitable, and must execute code on the targeted email client or server. Social engineering is prohibited: "In the context of this challenge only, exploitation includes the act of exploiting an e-mail client by opening the e-mail message with the default handler," according to iDefense's rules.

The bugs have to be original and not disclosed anywhere previously, and can't use or be caused by any third-party software on the target email client or server. The deadline is before midnight EST on December 31.

— Kelly Jackson Higgins, Senior Editor, Dark Reading

  • Mozilla
  • Microsoft Corp. (Nasdaq: MSFT)

    Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio
     

    Recommended Reading:

    Comment  | 
    Print  | 
    More Insights
  • Comments
    Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
    COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
    Dark Reading Staff 6/1/2020
    Stay-at-Home Orders Coincide With Massive DNS Surge
    Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  5/27/2020
    Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
    White Papers
    Video
    Cartoon Contest
    Current Issue
    How Cybersecurity Incident Response Programs Work (and Why Some Don't)
    This Tech Digest takes a look at the vital role cybersecurity incident response (IR) plays in managing cyber-risk within organizations. Download the Tech Digest today to find out how well-planned IR programs can detect intrusions, contain breaches, and help an organization restore normal operations.
    Flash Poll
    Twitter Feed
    Dark Reading - Bug Report
    Bug Report
    Enterprise Vulnerabilities
    From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
    CVE-2020-13757
    PUBLISHED: 2020-06-01
    Python-RSA 4.0 ignores leading '\0' bytes during decryption of ciphertext. This could conceivably have a security-relevant impact, e.g., by helping an attacker to infer that an application uses Python-RSA, or if the length of accepted ciphertext affects application behavior (such as by causing exces...
    CVE-2020-13758
    PUBLISHED: 2020-06-01
    modules/security/classes/general.post_filter.php/post_filter.php in the Web Application Firewall in Bitrix24 through 20.0.950 allows XSS by placing %00 before the payload.
    CVE-2020-9291
    PUBLISHED: 2020-06-01
    An Insecure Temporary File vulnerability in FortiClient for Windows 6.2.1 and below may allow a local user to gain elevated privileges via exhausting the pool of temporary file names combined with a symbolic link attack.
    CVE-2019-15709
    PUBLISHED: 2020-06-01
    An improper input validation in FortiAP-S/W2 6.2.0 to 6.2.2, 6.0.5 and below, FortiAP-U 6.0.1 and below CLI admin console may allow unauthorized administrators to overwrite system files via specially crafted tcpdump commands in the CLI.
    CVE-2020-13695
    PUBLISHED: 2020-06-01
    In QuickBox Community Edition through 2.5.5 and Pro Edition through 2.1.8, the local www-data user has sudo privileges to execute grep as root without a password, which allows an attacker to obtain sensitive information via a grep of a /root/*.db or /etc/shadow file.