Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Endpoint

10/27/2015
05:00 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Symantec CEO: How The Company Is Doubling Down On Enterprise Security

Security giant takes next big step in its makeover with a new security platform.

It's been 18 months since Symantec CEO Michael Brown took the helm of the security giant. In an interview with Dark Reading yesterday, Brown explained the company's evolution over the past year and a half and how its big new product announcement today, the rollout of the Symantec Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) platform, is the start of a whole "new Symantec."

ATP basically integrates and unifies Symantec's traditionally separate enterprise security offerings, including the endpoint. It also comes with a new cloud-based sandboxing element for vetting new threats, and is one of the first fruits of the company's $1 billion investment in R&D on Brown's watch.

"We've rededicated ourselves to enterprise security," Brown said. "The ATP announcement is the first in a wave of organic products we are developing to bring to the market."

The first major step was shedding the Veritas storage business in August. The storage side of Symantec's business contributed to much of the confusion and disarray in the company's strategy and focus, and resulted in its slipping in the security market, security experts say. In addition, its security products weren't well-integrated nor did they consistently draw from its threat intelligence data gathered from its endpoint customers in the consumer and enterprise spaces.

Meanwhile, Symantec's main rival Intel Security, formerly McAfee, today rolled out a similar integrated platform strategy to tie together its security offerings. Intel Security also included a next-generation endpoint detection and response (EDR) function. EDR, the emerging next phase of endpoint security that is more proactive and nimble than antivirus, does everything from detect unpatched bugs and suspicious events on the endpoint to isolate, investigate, and remediate it and share attack intelligence with the rest of the network when incidents occur.

Intel Security outlined a new strategy that focuses on the cloud and endpoint as "control points" to detect and remediate threats, as well as support for the Structured Threat Integration Expression (STIX) standard for the machine-ingestible threat data and the Trusted Automated eXchange of Indicator Information (TAXII) transport standard for threat intelligence information-sharing.

Symantec's Brown says his company plans to add EDR to its portfolio as well. Security tools historically have focused on protecting and blocking threats, he said, but detecting them quickly is key. "You need to accelerate the time to detect and remediate," he said, and the new ATP is a key platform for that.

Chris Young, senior vice president and general manager of Intel Security Group, echoed a similar theme with Intel's announcement today. "With a rapidly expanding attack surface, and a shortage of relevant talent and expertise, defenders need to win on visibility into events, simplified management, and capabilities that empower teams to close the loop on attacks in progress – faster, more effectively, and with fewer resources," he said.

Security analysts had expected Symantec and Intel Security to come up with EDR offerings in the coming months in order to keep pace with the evolution of endpoint security in the face of increasingly advanced threats.

Brown, meantime, said Symantec has been a leader in both consumer and enterprise security for years, but had been losing market share over the past few years. "In June … that quarter was the first time the enterprise security [business] has grown in two years" at Symantec, he said.

Michael Brown, CEO of Symantec
Source: Symantec

Michael Brown, CEO of Symantec

Source: Symantec

ATP uses a unified console view for detecting and remediating threats across Symantec Endpoint Security and Email Security.cloud products and the network, and doesn't include any new endpoint agent software. It works with third-party security incident event managers (SIEMs). "It prioritizes for security analysts what they need to focus on," Brown said, and cross-correlates and compares threats with the company's threat intelligence information.

But Brown says Symantec doesn't plan to be a "one-stop" security shop. ATP ultimately will include interfaces for customers to write their own apps as well as for other security products to work with it, he said. "You can't buy everything you may need from Symantec," he said. "We need to make our global intelligence accessible to our customers."

Look for more data leakage protection and cloud-based support for ATP, Brown said. "Increasingly, you need to be able to manage endpoints in the cloud. EDR managed from the cloud" is coming as well from Symantec, he said.

"We're going to continue to leverage the advantage we have in threat intelligence, and building this analytics platform [Unified Security Analytics] is key," Brown said when asked how he envisioned Symantec looking five years from now. "A year ago, we bought [data analytics firm] Narus, which got us 80 data scientists … to accelerate the process of our" analytics strategy, he said.

"A lot of CISOs are frustrated that they have to buy 50 or 100 technologies to protect their enterprise," Brown said. "Symantec is no different: our CISO was frustrated. He asked us to stop asking him to be an integrator and to have us take on more of that. ATP is [an] example of that" type of integration, he said.

"It's a new Symantec," Brown said. "We're spending more on R&D this year than last year. We feel we have a tremendous opportunity to serve our customers better" and to move security forward, he said.

 

Black Hat Europe returns to the beautiful city of Amsterdam, Netherlands November 12 & 13, 2015. Click here for more information and to register.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Joe Stanganelli
50%
50%
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Ninja
10/31/2015 | 5:40:00 AM
EDR
I can't help but wonder what this new focus means for the everyday "non-power" user.  Users understand "You have a virus!  Here's what you can do about it!"  But endpoint security and network vulnerabilities/intrusions are much more nuanced and more difficult to communicate the severity of and the solutions to.
News
Inside the Ransomware Campaigns Targeting Exchange Servers
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  4/2/2021
Commentary
Beyond MITRE ATT&CK: The Case for a New Cyber Kill Chain
Rik Turner, Principal Analyst, Infrastructure Solutions, Omdia,  3/30/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2015-20001
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-11
In the standard library in Rust before 1.2.0, BinaryHeap is not panic-safe. The binary heap is left in an inconsistent state when the comparison of generic elements inside sift_up or sift_down_range panics. This bug leads to a drop of zeroed memory as an arbitrary type, which can result in a memory ...
CVE-2020-36317
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-11
In the standard library in Rust before 1.49.0, String::retain() function has a panic safety problem. It allows creation of a non-UTF-8 Rust string when the provided closure panics. This bug could result in a memory safety violation when other string APIs assume that UTF-8 encoding is used on the sam...
CVE-2020-36318
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-11
In the standard library in Rust before 1.49.0, VecDeque::make_contiguous has a bug that pops the same element more than once under certain condition. This bug could result in a use-after-free or double free.
CVE-2021-28875
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-11
In the standard library in Rust before 1.50.0, read_to_end() does not validate the return value from Read in an unsafe context. This bug could lead to a buffer overflow.
CVE-2021-28876
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-11
In the standard library in Rust before 1.52.0, the Zip implementation has a panic safety issue. It calls __iterator_get_unchecked() more than once for the same index when the underlying iterator panics (in certain conditions). This bug could lead to a memory safety violation due to an unmet safety r...