Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Endpoint //

Privacy

10/15/2018
12:40 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

3 Out of 4 Employees Pose a Security Risk

New MediaPRO study also finds that management performed worse than entry- and mid-level employees in how to handle a suspected phishing email.

Despite concerted efforts by many US organizations to improve security awareness among users, a new study shows they still have a long way to go.

Some 75% of respondents today pose a moderate or severe risk to their company’s data, according to MediaPRO's third annual State of Privacy and Security Awareness Report, and 85% of finance workers show some lack of data security and privacy knowledge.

Tom Pendergast, chief security and privacy strategist at security awareness and training provider MediaPRO, says the firm surveyed more than 1,000 employees across the United States to quantify the state of privacy and security awareness in 2018. More people fell into the risk category this year than in 2017 – and that number had nearly doubled since the inaugural survey, he says.

"The overall results revealed a trend we weren't happy to see, that employees performed worse across the board compared to the previous year," Pendergast says. "While I think there's a certain amount of security fatigue from news of all the attacks, if in five years I don't see significant change I will be surprised. There's both a cultural a business awareness of the need to do good work in this area."

MediaPRO based its study on a variety of questions that focus on real-world scenarios, such as correctly identifying personal information, logging on to public Wi-Fi networks, and spotting phishing emails. Based on the percentage of privacy and security-aware behaviors, respondents were assigned to one of three risk profiles: risk, novice, or hero.

Here's a thumbnail of some other notable findings:

1. Employee performance was worse this year across all eight industry verticals measured. Respondents did much worse in identifying malware warning signs, knowing how to spot a phishing email and social media safety.

2. Managers showed riskier behaviors than lower-level employees. Management performed worse than their entry- and mid-level counterparts when asked how to respond to a suspected phishing email. Only 69% of managers chose the correct answer vs. 86% of lower-level employees. And nearly one in six management-level respondents – 17% - chose to open an unexpected attachment connected to a suspected phishing email.

3. Finance sector employees performed the worst. Of the seven vertical industry sectors examined, financial employees got the lowest scores. 85% showed some lack of cybersecurity and data privacy knowledge. And, 19% of finance workers thought opening an attachment was an appropriate response to a suspected phishing email.

4. Too many employees could not identity phishing emails. 14% of employees could not identity a phish, a notable increase from 8% in 2017. And, 58% could not define business email compromise. 

"We do need to train people people because it lets us reduce the number of incidents," says Frank Dickson, an IDC analyst who covers security. "But it's also the responsibility of the organization to provide the tools to stop these attacks. The organization needs to own this because it's a problem we've had for a long time."

Pendergast says most concerning to him was that some survey takers did not always know how to respond properly to a suspected phishing attempt. For example, when asked how to correctly respond to a phishing email, 10% say they would open the content to verify it contents; and another 8% say they would click on a link to verify the legitimacy of the website it leads to.

While 81% say they would report the suspected phishing email to their IT department – the correct response – Pendergast says those numbers are alarming given that that attackers only need one mistake to be successful.

"It only takes one person to click on the wrong email that lets in the malware that exfiltrates your company’s data," Pendergast says. "Without everybody being more vigilant, people and company data will continue to be at risk."

 

 

Black Hat Europe returns to London Dec 3-6 2018  with hands-on technical Trainings, cutting-edge Briefings, Arsenal open-source tool demonstrations, top-tier security solutions and service providers in the Business Hall. Click for information on the conference and to register.

Steve Zurier has more than 30 years of journalism and publishing experience, most of the last 24 of which were spent covering networking and security technology. Steve is based in Columbia, Md. View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
CallumLepide
50%
50%
CallumLepide,
User Rank: Apprentice
10/16/2018 | 9:35:52 AM
Spot on
I could not agree more
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 8/14/2020
Lock-Pickers Face an Uncertain Future Online
Seth Rosenblatt, Contributing Writer,  8/10/2020
Hacking It as a CISO: Advice for Security Leadership
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  8/10/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
7 New Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities That Could Put Your Enterprise at Risk
In this Dark Reading Tech Digest, we look at the ways security researchers and ethical hackers find critical vulnerabilities and offer insights into how you can fix them before attackers can exploit them.
Flash Poll
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
This special report takes a look at how enterprises are using threat intelligence, as well as emerging best practices for integrating threat intel into security operations and incident response. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-17475
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
Lack of authentication in the network relays used in MEGVII Koala 2.9.1-c3s allows attackers to grant physical access to anyone by sending packet data to UDP port 5000.
CVE-2020-0255
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2020-10751. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2020-10751. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2020-10751 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidenta...
CVE-2020-14353
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-18270. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2017-18270. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-18270 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidenta...
CVE-2020-17464
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none.
CVE-2020-17473
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
Lack of mutual authentication in ZKTeco FaceDepot 7B 1.0.213 and ZKBiosecurity Server 1.0.0_20190723 allows an attacker to obtain a long-lasting token by impersonating the server.