Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Endpoint

10/13/2015
11:20 AM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Believe It Or Not, Millennials Do Care About Privacy, Security

80% say it is vitally or very important that PII, financial, and/or medical data be shared only with authorized parties

Research released today conflicts with the prevailing stereotype that the Millennial generation doesn't care a whit about privacy, and that data security is, correspondingly, a low priority. Millenials "do care about data security and privacy," according to a survey of approximately 2,000 16- to 35-year-olds in the United States and United Kingdom, commissioned by identity management firm Intercede and conducted by Atomik Research.

"Often times I was told by the industry that Millennials don’t care about cybersecurity or the services we provide, that identity management and secure authentication was not a priority because Millennials look at things differently as a generation that grew up digitally engaged," says Richard Parris, CEO of Intercede. "So when we first set out to do this survey we thought that’s what the findings would reveal. ... but it’s the opposite."

Eighty percent of respondents said it was "vital" or "very important" that personally identifiable, financial, and medical data be shared only with those whom they have authorized access. Respondents were somewhat less concerned about other data: 74 percent responded the same about location data, 58 percent for social media content, and 57 percent for purchasing preferences.

Most of them aren't entirely willing to surrender data just to get a better retail experience or free stuff. Only 40 percent of respondents would hand over location data in exchange for targeted goods or services and 40 percent would give a summary of their shopping habits in exchange for free products and services.

Retail ranked in the middle of the pack, when respondents were asked to rate what level of trust they place in industry verticals with their personal information online. Lowest on the list were social media platforms (61 percent saying they put little or no trust in those sites), dating sites, and search engines. Highest on the list were financial institutions and government; however there were still a large component of respondents (22 percent) that said their level of trust in government was "little" to "none."

Respondents did indicate some level of helplessness over the situation. When asked for their personal motivation for allowing compnies to have access to their data, the most common response, (23 percent) was "I believe they will have access to my data either way, so it doesn't matter if I grant it to them or not."

Yet, they also indicated that there would be a tipping point -- 54% said that companies' and government agencies' failure to improve online security will eventually result in public distrust of goods and services and 44% said there will be an eventual decline in data sharing. 

"For government and business service providers the lesson to take away is that they should not be making broad assumptions and getting it wrong," says Parris. "They will see a churn in user behavior and long term repercussions happen if privacy and data security is not looked at as a priority."

As far as their understanding of security practices and willingness to use them, security professionals may find the results frustrating. Only 6 percent of the Millennials surveyed feel their data is extremely secure based upon the password policy they apply. Eighteen percent are less likely to use a digital resource or device if it requires complex passwords to use it, yet only 32 percent state they would like to see more secure and convenient digital verification and authentication methods available. Some of those respondents, though -- 30 percent of them -- would even welcome or consider digital chip implants as a next-generation method for secure identity management.

"I think what this survey says is Millennials aren’t really that different from the rest of the population," says Parris. "Yes, they do share a bit more - but it doesn’t mean that they aren’t concerned with privacy or that they aren’t uncomfortable by the idea of that privacy being compromised. They make judgments about what information they share and where they share it. There is a segmentation that is preformed -- they evaluate what they will get as a benefit vs. what they have to give up."

Sara Peters is Senior Editor at Dark Reading and formerly the editor-in-chief of Enterprise Efficiency. Prior that she was senior editor for the Computer Security Institute, writing and speaking about virtualization, identity management, cybersecurity law, and a myriad ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Whoopty
50%
50%
Whoopty,
User Rank: Ninja
10/14/2015 | 7:57:22 AM
Difference
I think that's something that a lot of people miss about the millenial generation - which should really be split up as there is a stark difference between those birthed in the late 80s and those born in the late 90s - that while they are the most prolific sharers ever, often times what's shared is a front. 

Here's me on holiday, here's me doing awesome things, here's me eating this and buying that. That's not the real them. The real them is just as privacy concious as ever, but they split that into something seperate. 

That's what they care about protecting, just as any generation has.
Windows 10 Migration: Getting It Right
Kevin Alexandra, Principal Solutions Engineer at BeyondTrust,  5/15/2019
Artist Uses Malware in Installation
Dark Reading Staff 5/17/2019
Baltimore Ransomware Attack Takes Strange Twist
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  5/14/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
Building and Managing an IT Security Operations Program
As cyber threats grow, many organizations are building security operations centers (SOCs) to improve their defenses. In this Tech Digest you will learn tips on how to get the most out of a SOC in your organization - and what to do if you can't afford to build one.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-12184
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-19
There is XSS in browser/components/MarkdownPreview.js in BoostIO Boostnote 0.11.15 via a label named flowchart, sequence, gallery, or chart, as demonstrated by a crafted SRC attribute of an IFRAME element, a different vulnerability than CVE-2019-12136.
CVE-2019-12173
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-18
MacDown 0.7.1 (870) allows remote code execution via a file:\\\ URI, with a .app pathname, in the HREF attribute of an A element. This is different from CVE-2019-12138.
CVE-2019-12172
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-17
Typora 0.9.9.21.1 (1913) allows arbitrary code execution via a modified file: URL syntax in the HREF attribute of an AREA element, as demonstrated by file:\\\ on macOS or Linux, or file://C| on Windows. This is different from CVE-2019-12137.
CVE-2019-12168
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-17
Four-Faith Wireless Mobile Router F3x24 v1.0 devices allow remote code execution via the Command Shell (aka Administration > Commands) screen.
CVE-2019-12170
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-17
ATutor through 2.2.4 is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads via the mods/_core/backups/upload.php (aka backup) component. This may result in remote command execution. An attacker can use the instructor account to fully compromise the system using a crafted backup ZIP archive. This will allow for PH...