Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Endpoint Security //

Windows

// // //
9/10/2018
08:05 AM
Larry Loeb
Larry Loeb
Larry Loeb

Cryptominers Rush to Exploit Apache Struts 2 Vulnerability

The Apache Struts 2 vulnerability was revealed about two weeks ago. Now F5 Labs has found that it's being used in a Monero cryptomining exploit.

Well, that didn't take long.

 

About two weeks after the Apache Struts 2 vulnerability was revealed, F5 Labs has found evidenceof its use in a Monero (XMR) cryptomining exploit. Another such exploit was also seen last week, but differs in the details.

 

F5 has dubbed this campaign CroniX because it uses cron (for persistency) and Xhide (for launching executables with fake process names).

 

The vulnerability (CVE-2018-11776) allows attackers to inject Object-Graph Navigation Language (OGNL) expressions into an application using the Struts framework. The OGNL can contain malicious Java code that will be evaluated under several circumstances. In this case, the injection point is in the URL.

 

The attacker will send an HTTP request while injecting an OGNL expression. Once evaluated, the request executes shell commands that will cause the download and execution of a malicious file.

 

While F5 found direct evidence of Linux exploits, their investigation also found files on the command and control server that held PowerShell commands that could target Windows systems.

 

To make sure it is the only miner on the affected system, ChroniX will delete the binaries of other cryptominers that may be present on the system.

geralt via Pixabay
geralt via Pixabay

But this is done with some finesse. Since those other cryptominers may be hiding under legitimate process names, a further check is done to see if the targeted process is using more than 60% of the system resources. Only then is the process deleted.

 

Then, the attacker goes out and gets the latest versions of the malware, basically the "run" and "upd" bash scripts. Two additional binary executables -- "xmrig" and a file called "H" -- are downloaded. Each of them has an x86 and an x64 version.

 

The "xmrig" file is a miner that contains an embedded configuration (pool, username and password). The "H" file is an older XHide tool that is used for launching executables with a fake process name.

 

The attacker communicates with a Monero pool at "eu.minerpool.pw."

 

The threat actor has been previously known to F5, but it did not specify any name. However, the group notes that the "quite unique usage of 'XHide-Process Faker' made us believe that the threat actor behind the exploitation of this fresh Struts 2 vulnerability is the same one that was behind a previous campaign exploiting Jenkins servers via CVE-2017-1000353." In that instance the threat actor used a Chinese Git website to host malicious files.

 

F5 detected that the attacker is using a dedicated web server hosted in the US this time to serve the malicious files. Not only that, Palaudomain names are used in the exploit. They were found to be registered by a Russian registrant.

— Larry Loeb has written for many of the last century's major "dead tree" computer magazines, having been, among other things, a consulting editor for BYTE magazine and senior editor for the launch of WebWeek.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
The 10 Most Impactful Types of Vulnerabilities for Enterprises Today
Managing system vulnerabilities is one of the old est - and most frustrating - security challenges that enterprise defenders face. Every software application and hardware device ships with intrinsic flaws - flaws that, if critical enough, attackers can exploit from anywhere in the world. It's crucial that defenders take stock of what areas of the tech stack have the most emerging, and critical, vulnerabilities they must manage. It's not just zero day vulnerabilities. Consider that CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog lists vulnerabilitlies in widely used applications that are "actively exploited," and most of them are flaws that were discovered several years ago and have been fixed. There are also emerging vulnerabilities in 5G networks, cloud infrastructure, Edge applications, and firmwares to consider.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2023-1142
PUBLISHED: 2023-03-27
In Delta Electronics InfraSuite Device Master versions prior to 1.0.5, an attacker could use URL decoding to retrieve system files, credentials, and bypass authentication resulting in privilege escalation.
CVE-2023-1143
PUBLISHED: 2023-03-27
In Delta Electronics InfraSuite Device Master versions prior to 1.0.5, an attacker could use Lua scripts, which could allow an attacker to remotely execute arbitrary code.
CVE-2023-1144
PUBLISHED: 2023-03-27
Delta Electronics InfraSuite Device Master versions prior to 1.0.5 contains an improper access control vulnerability in which an attacker can use the Device-Gateway service and bypass authorization, which could result in privilege escalation.
CVE-2023-1145
PUBLISHED: 2023-03-27
Delta Electronics InfraSuite Device Master versions prior to 1.0.5 are affected by a deserialization vulnerability targeting the Device-DataCollect service, which could allow deserialization of requests prior to authentication, resulting in remote code execution.
CVE-2023-1655
PUBLISHED: 2023-03-27
Heap-based Buffer Overflow in GitHub repository gpac/gpac prior to 2.4.0.