Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

News

7/22/2009
05:49 PM
George Crump
George Crump
Commentary
50%
50%

Un-Unified Storage

The last few entries we have been covering aspects of unified storage. The bottom line is that unified storage has it's place and many organizations can benefit by having these systems, but where does this leave storage platforms that essentially do one thing and do it well?

The last few entries we have been covering aspects of unified storage. The bottom line is that unified storage has it's place and many organizations can benefit by having these systems, but where does this leave storage platforms that essentially do one thing and do it well?There are examples throughout the various storage categories SANs, for example like those from 3PAR or Compellent which have fibre and iSCSI built in and Dell's EqualLogic storage is iSCSI only. In all three cases they are as easy to use as most unified platforms and NAS can be added via a gateway like ONStor's or even a Windows Storage Server. The unified camp will say that is their weakness, that you have to manage the NAS through a separate interface. That is a fair accusation, but for your environment it may not be a deal breaker. Most data centers will always have more than one storage platform, managing NAS services separately may not be a huge burden for you.

For this theoretical trade-off you often benefit with unique capabilities. Dell and 3PAR both offer via different methods a unique scale-out capability that maintains performance as the platform grows. 3PAR also includes specialized silicon to optimize its cornerstone thin provisioning capabilities. As we discuss in our article on "Keep Thin Provisioning Thin", advancing the state of the art of thin provisioning is going to require partnering with companies like Symantec to leverage Thin API's at the file system level and it may require specialized hardware to bring advanced thin provisioned volumes without impacting performance.

Network Attached Storage (NAS) is where unification really began and most NAS vendors now offer some block protocol support typically via iSCSI, a few like BlueArc and Isilon are still mostly focused on the file system side of the business. BlueArc for its focus has delivered high performance and a suite of file management tools while Isilon has focused on building a scale out architecture that can offer linear performance or high density.

Focus gets these companies to where their competition wants to be faster, in some cases years. The linear performance offered by clustered storage is a great example, almost every major manufacturer has expressed a desire to offer products in this category yet the companies that have focused on it have been delivering them for years. In our article "Searching for High Performance Storage" we explain the challenges involved in maintaining storage performance as the environment scales. This is an issue for many companies and with the continued growth in server virtualization, an increasing number of companies will need scalable storage IO.

What's better, to have two storage platforms, one focused on block IO and the other on file IO, or to have a single unified platform but deal with either additional systems as your storage capacity and performance demands grow? Part of the answer depends on how quickly and how often you will need to add that capacity and performance.

If the only constant in your environment is an ever increasing demand for capacity and performance then the linear scale of a cluster, even if it is in two pods (NAS and SAN) might be better. If the demands of the system you can afford today more than meet your needs for performance and capacity then a unified system may be more cost effective and potentially easier to use.

Track us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/storageswiss

Subscribe to our RSS feed.

George Crump is founder of Storage Switzerland, an analyst firm focused on the virtualization and storage marketplaces. It provides strategic consulting and analysis to storage users, suppliers, and integrators. An industry veteran of more than 25 years, Crump has held engineering and sales positions at various IT industry manufacturers and integrators. Prior to Storage Switzerland, he was CTO at one of the nation's largest integrators.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Why Cyber-Risk Is a C-Suite Issue
Marc Wilczek, Digital Strategist & CIO Advisor,  11/12/2019
6 Small-Business Password Managers
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  11/8/2019
Unreasonable Security Best Practices vs. Good Risk Management
Jack Freund, Director, Risk Science at RiskLens,  11/13/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-18885
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-14
fs/btrfs/volumes.c in the Linux kernel before 5.1 allows a btrfs_verify_dev_extents NULL pointer dereference via a crafted btrfs image because fs_devices->devices is mishandled within find_device, aka CID-09ba3bc9dd15.
CVE-2019-18895
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-14
Scanguard through 2019-11-12 on Windows has Insecure Permissions for the installation directory, leading to privilege escalation via a Trojan horse executable file.
CVE-2019-18957
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-14
Microstrategy Library in MicroStrategy before 2019 before 11.1.3 has reflected XSS.
CVE-2019-16863
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-14
STMicroelectronics ST33TPHF2ESPI TPM devices before 2019-09-12 allow attackers to extract the ECDSA private key via a side-channel timing attack because ECDSA scalar multiplication is mishandled, aka TPM-FAIL.
CVE-2019-18949
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-14
SnowHaze before 2.6.6 is sometimes too late to honor a per-site JavaScript blocking setting, which leads to unintended JavaScript execution via a chain of webpage redirections targeted to the user's browser configuration.