Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Perimeter

Guest Blog // Selected Security Content Provided By Sophos
What's This?
7/20/2010
07:03 AM
Graham Cluley
Graham Cluley
Security Insights
50%
50%

Danger, USB! Questions Raised By CPLINK Zero-Day Vulnerability

Are you taking your USB stick security seriously? That's just one of many questions you ought to be be asking yourself right now.

Are you taking your USB stick security seriously? That's just one of many questions you ought to be be asking yourself right now.The big security story right now is the zero-day vulnerability in Windows, which can let a program run automatically off a USB stick (and from other places -- for instance, network shares) even if you merely browse to the files on the thumb drive, and even if you have AutoRun and Autoplay turned off.

In other words, viewing a USB stick's directory in Explorer can run a file in the directory without asking permission. Ouch!

The good news is that up-to-date security software can block this behavior by blocking the special files (malicious LNK files), which drive the so-called "CPLINK" exploit.

But the whole problem begs a bigger question: What are you doing about potentially dangerous USB sticks from outside in the first place? And why are you letting uninfected memory sticks from inside get written to outside the network at all?

Shouldn't you keep any unwanted USB sticks out -- not just in case of malware, but in case of any untrustworthy anything?

And shouldn't you protect your own uninfected, important, and trusted keys from any sort of compromise, whether by malware or by data stealing, by any sort of cybercriminal activity?

Shouldn't you be considering device control? Device encryption?

Yes, there's a big story in the media because of the malware problem. But the core problem is deeper: the rogue movement of data and the rogue use of your own USB resources!

Graham Cluley is senior technology consultant at Sophos, and has been working in the computer security field since the early 1990s. When he's not updating his award-winning other blog on the Sophos website, you can find him on Twitter at @gcluley. Special to Dark Reading.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Navigating Security in the Cloud
Diya Jolly, Chief Product Officer, Okta,  12/4/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-19642
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-08
On SuperMicro X8STi-F motherboards with IPMI firmware 2.06 and BIOS 02.68, the Virtual Media feature allows OS Command Injection by authenticated attackers who can send HTTP requests to the IPMI IP address. This requires a POST to /rpc/setvmdrive.asp with shell metacharacters in ShareHost or ShareNa...
CVE-2019-19637
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-08
An issue was discovered in libsixel 1.8.2. There is an integer overflow in the function sixel_decode_raw_impl at fromsixel.c.
CVE-2019-19638
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-08
An issue was discovered in libsixel 1.8.2. There is a heap-based buffer overflow in the function load_pnm at frompnm.c, due to an integer overflow.
CVE-2019-19635
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-08
An issue was discovered in libsixel 1.8.2. There is a heap-based buffer overflow in the function sixel_decode_raw_impl at fromsixel.c.
CVE-2019-19636
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-08
An issue was discovered in libsixel 1.8.2. There is an integer overflow in the function sixel_encode_body at tosixel.c.