Shellshock Attacks Spotted Against NAS DevicesShellshock Attacks Spotted Against NAS Devices
First in-the-wild exploits found targeting QNAP network-attached storage devices.
October 2, 2014
Just a week after news of the Shellshock Bash bug went wide open, researchers believe the onslaught against the Internet of Things (IoT) has already begun. The malicious actors are starting with attacks targeting network-attached storage (NAS) devices, say researchers with FireEye, who believe these are the first in-the-wild attacks against embedded devices using the Bash remote code injection vulnerability.
According to FireEye researchers James Bennett and Josh Gomez, the attack has homed in on NAS devices made by QNAP, which is among the top manufacturers of low-cost NAS devices for consumer, SMB, and enterprise customers. These devices, along with QNAP video surveillance and network media player devices, all primarily run embedded Linux and are vulnerable to Shellshock without a patch. The way that the Bash vulnerability presents itself in these devices grants root privileges to attackers, and QNAP has warned users to completely disconnect systems from the Internet until they can patch the bug.
"We have evidence that attackers are actively exploiting the time-to-patch window and targeting embedded devices, specifically those made by QNAP, in order to append their SSH key to the authorized_keys file and install an ELF backdoor," the researchers wrote.
These attacks have so far been targeting QNAP NAS devices on networks associated with universities and research institutions in Japan and Korea, as well as an isolated case in the US. The attack attempts to instruct the target NAS to download a script that affects the device's startup environment to allow for future malicious updates, loads the malicious SSH key to allow for future password bypass, and then further cements itself with an ELF executable that gives the attacker shell access to the device and can be invoked in three different ways. FireEye warns that even if unpatched QNAP NAS devices are taken off the Internet, they could still be vulnerable to lateral attacks from inside a network.
Considering that NAS systems are used by consumers and organizations to store large amounts of data and to house databases, it is no wonder they're attracting Shellshock-armed attackers like flies to honey.
"This makes an NAS an attractive target for attackers given the broad types of data they handle," they said. "In this case, the attackers can gain full access the NAS contents as well as execute other commands."
According to Jacob Holcomb, a researcher preparing to present at Black Hat Europe on NAS security, about half of NAS devices he's investigated can be taken over without authentication. A security analyst for Independent Security Evaluators, Holcomb recently uncovered 30 zero-day vulnerabilities in a dozen major NAS vendor products and roll them up into a proof-of-concept, self-replicating NAS worm. Holcomb believes that NAS devices can present a meaningful weakness for a number of types of attacks, including as a foothold for attackers to sprinkle infected files that could be used to send the attack to other devices on the network and as a control center for man-in-the-middle attacks against routers and network clients.
About the Author(s)
Tricks to Boost Your Threat Hunting GameNov 06, 2023
Hacking Your Digital Identity: How Cybercriminals Can and Will Get Around Your Authentication MethodsOct 26, 2023
Modern Supply Chain Security: Integrated, Interconnected, and Context-DrivenNov 06, 2023
How to Combat the Latest Cloud Security ThreatsNov 06, 2023
Reducing Cyber Risk in Enterprise Email Systems: It's Not Just Spam and PhishingNov 01, 2023
Passwords Are Passe: Next Gen Authentication Addresses Today's Threats
How to Deploy Zero Trust for Remote Workforce Security
What Ransomware Groups Look for in Enterprise Victims
Concerns Mount Over Ransomware, Zero-Day Bugs, and AI-Enabled Malware
Securing the Remote Worker: How to Mitigate Off-Site Cyberattacks