Study: Small NAC Vendors Keep CustomersStudy: Small NAC Vendors Keep Customers
Current Analysis announced the availability of their annual Network Access Control study
August 21, 2007

STERLING, Va. -- Current Analysis today announced the availability of their annual Network Access Control (NAC) study. Among the results are indications that although the large brand name vendors are capturing – and establishing – initial mindshare, smaller players are solidly establishing themselves among loyal groups of customers.
The Current Analysis NAC study examines the technical, business, and operational issues that are influencing enterprise adoption of NAC solutions. This is the second annual tracking study of the evolution and maturation of this hot market. As with the 2006 study from Current Analysis, the findings provide a detailed view of the competitive landscape and business demand for NAC technology. This year’s data set includes 290 highly qualified respondents - all directly involved in the use or selection of NAC technologies in their organizations.
The study measures two key metrics: (1) “Vendor Attraction”, which is the percentage of respondents who would consider the vendor for a NAC solution, even though they are not currently NAC customers of that vendor, and (2) “Vendor Retention”, which is the percentage of respondents who are NAC customers of the vendor and would consider the same vendor for future NAC investments.
Table 1:
Vendor Attraction Scores* | |
Cisco (NAC appliance) | 45% |
Cisco (CNAC) | 41% |
Microsoft | 21% |
Check Point | 15% |
Juniper Networks | 15% |
Sygate/Symantec | 13% |
3Com/Tipping Point | 12% |
Trend Micro | 12% |
McAfee/Foundstone | 11% |
HP Procurve | 11% |
IBM Tivoli | 10% |
Nortel | 7% |
Computer Associates | 5% |
Bradford Networks | 1% |
* Only companies whose customers made up at least 5% of the total sample are listed. |
Table 2:
Vendor Retention Scores* | |
Computer Associates | 81% |
Juniper Networks | 80% |
Bradford Networks | 78% |
Check Point | 71% |
Nortel | 71% |
HP Procurve | 69% |
Cisco (CNAC) | 68% |
Cisco (NAC appliance) | 67% |
Microsoft | 65% |
McAfee/Foundstone | 63% |
Sygate/Symantec | 60% |
3Com/Tipping Point | 59% |
IBM Tivoli | 58% |
Trend Micro | 43% |
* Only companies whose customers made up at least 5% of the total sample are listed. |
“This year's NAC study demonstrates again that no vendor can match Cisco in its ability to attract attention to its NAC solutions, and this is true for both its NAC appliance and the broader CNAC framework. What is interesting, however, is that many vendors are clearly meeting market demands and satisfying customer needs for NAC functionality and this includes several of the smaller pure play vendors,” said Andrew Braunberg, Research Director, Enterprise Software and Security.
About the Author(s)
You May Also Like
Modern Supply Chain Security: Integrated, Interconnected, and Context-Driven
Nov 06, 2023How to Combat the Latest Cloud Security Threats
Nov 06, 2023Reducing Cyber Risk in Enterprise Email Systems: It's Not Just Spam and Phishing
Nov 01, 2023SecOps & DevSecOps in the Cloud
Nov 06, 2023What's In Your Cloud?
Nov 30, 2023