E-Voter In a Swing State

When I arrived at the polls at 6 a.m. this morning, those of us at the head of the line watched nervously as election officials frantically tried to calibrate my small town's two e-voting machines after they malfunctioned -- just before the first voters were about to cast their votes.

When I arrived at the polls at 6 a.m. this morning, those of us at the head of the line watched nervously as election officials frantically tried to calibrate my small town's two e-voting machines after they malfunctioned -- just before the first voters were about to cast their votes.The delay was only a few minutes, but I got to see firsthand just how fragile e-voting systems can be. My home state of Virginia -- which for the first time in more than 40 years is actually a swing state in a presidential election, making the glitch this morning even more profound -- is actually planning to phase out these touch-screen systems and revert to paper ballots. Paper ballots! After my county only just recently upgraded from tabulation machines. But this retro-voting method is actually safer and more accurate (when used in tandem with an optical scanning system, of course). There's something quaint about the concept of putting pencil to paper these days. But with demonstrated vulnerabilities of e-voting systems increasing, and voter suppression on the rise along with the number of registered new voters, it makes sense to have a paper backup. The e-voting systems here in Virginia and neighboring Maryland don't actually print out a copy of your vote to ensure it was recorded properly. So reverting back to paper and optical scans would give voters here for the first time a "receipt," as one of my neighbors so colorfully described the printouts while we waited in line this morning to touch the screen.

Still, to many voters it seems backward to replace new technology for a standby. Touch-screens are the way we bank at the ATM and order sandwiches at Sheetz. But those of us who are well-aware of the potential hacking threat of e-voting systems are just relieved that our vote has a better chance of being counted, even if it means going retro.

- Kelly Jackson Higgins, Senior Editor, Dark Reading

Read more about:

2008

About the Author(s)

Kelly Jackson Higgins, Editor-in-Chief, Dark Reading

Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Editor-in-Chief of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise Magazine, Virginia Business magazine, and other major media properties. Jackson Higgins was recently selected as one of the Top 10 Cybersecurity Journalists in the US, and named as one of Folio's 2019 Top Women in Media. She began her career as a sports writer in the Washington, DC metropolitan area, and earned her BA at William & Mary. Follow her on Twitter @kjhiggins.

Keep up with the latest cybersecurity threats, newly discovered vulnerabilities, data breach information, and emerging trends. Delivered daily or weekly right to your email inbox.

You May Also Like


More Insights