Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Cloud

4/7/2017
02:30 PM
Kaushik Narayan
Kaushik Narayan
Commentary
Connect Directly
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail vvv
50%
50%

The New Shadow IT: Custom Data Center Applications

If you think you've finally gotten control of unsanctioned user apps, think again. The next wave of rogue apps is on its way from your data center to the cloud.

Over the years, the consumerization of IT has spurred a free-for-all in the adoption of cloud services. As employees found unsanctioned applications to help them do their jobs, overwhelmed security teams took a head-in-the-sand approach, giving rise to a serious problem dubbed "Shadow IT." But how big of a problem is Shadow IT, really? That depends who you ask.

Based on my personal conversations, CIOs estimate the number of unsanctioned cloud apps to be around 100. But in a tally based on an analysis of network logs, Shadow IT totals are much larger –averaging roughly 1,000 cloud services in use since early 2015.

Since those early days, companies have taken a more proactive and managed approach to the cloud by moving to enterprise-wide deployments of applications like Office 365, Salesforce, and Box. But just as organizations think they have Shadow IT under control, a new area of rogue cloud computing has emerged: custom applications developed by a company on its own and hosted in the cloud.

Everyone Is in the Business of Software Development
New research Skyhigh Networks conducted with the Cloud Security Alliance surveyed over 300 technology professionals from departments including software developers, IT, security, operations, and DevOps. The research showed that security teams, on average, estimate their organization uses 179 custom applications. But in reality, according to the research, the average organization uses 464 custom applications, with larger companies with over 50,000 employees averaging 788 applications! That means security is aware of only 38% of custom cloud applications in use in their businesses.

Developers and DevOps build these applications for business use cases, but the applications do not necessarily pass through a security review before they are deployed. What are they? Custom applications serve diverse functions across internal employees, third-party business partners, and customers. A company may develop their own HR benefits application, code-sharing platform, or customer service tools. As a result, these applications often hold sensitive data ranging from personally identifiable information, confidential intellectual property, and payment data.

[Check out the two-day Dark Reading Cybersecurity Crash Course at Interop ITX, May 15 & 16, where Dark Reading editors and some of the industry's top cybersecurity experts will share the latest data security trends and best practices.]

These applications pose many of the same risks to corporate data as SaaS applications. But they also can trigger additional threats because they are hosted in IaaS platforms. In 2017, we will witness a tipping point for custom app deployment, when, for the first time, companies plan to deploy a majority of their computing resources in the cloud. According to Skyhigh and CSA’s survey, 61% of custom applications are currently hosted in corporate data centers, but that percentage will decline to 46% by the end of the year.

And, it’s not just trivial, low-impact applications that are moving to the cloud. According to our survey, of companies with business-critical custom applications, 46% already host those applications in the cloud with the remaining majority of custom applications developed for use in the datacenter. Retrofitting these data center applications with cloud-specific security will require development resources that most talent-strapped security departments simply do not have.

Missing Pieces of Custom Application Security
Custom applications hosted on IaaS share many of the same threats to data as SaaS. But SaaS security gives us a framework to understand these threats in IaaS-hosted custom apps. Malicious insiders, employee error, and compromised accounts, for example, all create risk to sensitive data in custom applications that could potentially lead to compliance violations. For instance, in a typical IaaS environment, a company could have a custom CRM application in the cloud with an encrypted field for credit card numbers, but employees may carelessly enter credit card numbers in a different unencrypted field like "Notes," violating PCI regulations.

Hosted in IaaS platforms, custom applications pose unique security challenges as well. Enterprise SaaS service providers develop robust APIs that allow customers to monitor and enforce security policies at scale across billions of activities every month. For example, Slack recently launched an Enterprise Grid API to accommodate security teams' requirement to monitor high risk activity on the application. Enterprise SaaS applications also create markets for security solutions from third-party providers. Custom enterprise applications lack both traits, leaving security teams on their own to lock down hundreds of applications.

As a result, companies will be left struggling to address four critical areas of security functionality:

Threat Protection: SOC teams require behavioral monitoring to detect threats in action – for example, anomalous behavior that is indicative of a compromised account. Enterprise SaaS services provide APIs or event logs for consumption from third party security providers, but custom applications require custom-developed solutions to analyze activity data. There is a huge blindspot across custom applications for threats from inside and outside the company.

Encryption: Regulations like HIPAA require organizations to encrypt sensitive data uploaded to the cloud. Specifically, organizations often need to encrypt data in their own geographic district with their own customer-managed encryption keys. Companies did not have to contend with these requirements when their custom applications were in the data center, but now that custom applications are on IaaS cloud platforms, they will be held responsible for violations.

Data Loss Prevention: SaaS platforms open the door to access to data anywhere. Cloud-hosted custom applications are available via the open Internet, putting sensitive data at risk of violating corporate security policies. The data companies want to protect with data loss prevention includes social security numbers, salaries, IP addresses, file names containing "password," and more. Controls enforcing off-network, BYOD, location-based, and content-based access policies are just a few of the capabilities IT security should insist on.

Activity monitoring: Incident response and audit teams require an audit trail of behavior on an application for post-incident forensic investigations. When custom applications leave the datacenter for IaaS platforms, they lose event logging capabilities by default. Without any record of employee activity, IT security cannot effectively respond to and remediate security incidents.

Why has security been circumvented in the flood of custom applications to the cloud? If the first wave of Shadow IT was the consumerization of applications via SaaS, the next wave has become the consumerization of infrastructure where developers and DevOps no longer need to work with security to access datacenter resources. As a result, security is faced with a stark ultimatum: Enable security for custom applications or be left behind.

Related Content:

 

Kaushik Narayan is a co-founder and CTO at Skyhigh Networks, where he is responsible for Skyhigh's technology vision and software architecture. He brings over 18 years of experience driving technology and architecture strategy for enterprise-class products. He has been ... View Full Bio
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Catherine Hudson
50%
50%
Catherine Hudson,
User Rank: Apprentice
5/18/2017 | 1:08:32 PM
Measures
Thank you, for raising a topical issue. I think SAM tools, such as Binadox, can help to solve at least part of the issue. They monitor SaaS subscription and usage events and thus, you can analyze what applications are used by your employees and decide what exposures they have to take measures.
BrooklynNellie2
100%
0%
BrooklynNellie2,
User Rank: Strategist
4/11/2017 | 8:49:47 AM
Re: The subject of your site is awesome and i'm interested to know more about..
Where's the "report spam" button?
MoleanM781
33%
67%
MoleanM781,
User Rank: Apprentice
4/8/2017 | 3:59:12 AM
The subject of your site is awesome and i'm interested to know more about..
I'm extremely pleased to discover this site. I want to to thank you for your time for this particularly wonderful read!! I definitely loved every part of it and I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff in your site.<br/><a href="https://www.hoursguru.com/bdm-customs/" >Bdm Customs Near Me</a><br/><a href="https://www.hoursguru.com/a-and-w-distributor/" >A & W Distributor Working Hours</a>
A Realistic Threat Model for the Masses
Lysa Myers, Security Researcher, ESET,  10/9/2019
USB Drive Security Still Lags
Dark Reading Staff 10/9/2019
Virginia a Hot Spot For Cybersecurity Jobs
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  10/9/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
7 Threats & Disruptive Forces Changing the Face of Cybersecurity
This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at the biggest emerging threats and disruptive forces that are changing the face of cybersecurity today.
Flash Poll
2019 Online Malware and Threats
2019 Online Malware and Threats
As cyberattacks become more frequent and more sophisticated, enterprise security teams are under unprecedented pressure to respond. Is your organization ready?
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-14832
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-15
A flaw was found in the Keycloak REST API before version 8.0.0 where it would permit user access from a realm the user was not configured. An authenticated attacker with knowledge of a user id could use this flaw to access unauthorized information or to carry out further attacks.
CVE-2017-10022
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-15
In haml versions prior to version 5.0.0.beta.2, when using user input to perform tasks on the server, characters like &lt; &gt; &quot; ' must be escaped properly. In this case, the ' character was missed. An attacker can manipulate the input to introduce additional attributes, potentially executing ...
CVE-2019-10759
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-15
safer-eval before 1.3.4 are vulnerable to Arbitrary Code Execution. A payload using constructor properties can escape the sandbox and execute arbitrary code.
CVE-2019-10760
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-15
safer-eval before 1.3.2 are vulnerable to Arbitrary Code Execution. A payload using constructor properties can escape the sandbox and execute arbitrary code.
CVE-2019-17397
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-15
In the DoorDash application through 11.5.2 for Android, the username and password are stored in the log during authentication, and may be available to attackers via logcat.