Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Cloud

3/16/2016
04:45 PM
James Bindseil
James Bindseil
Commentary
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail vvv
50%
50%

EU-US Privacy Shield: What Now, What Next?

The good news: We finally have a clear direction for continuing trans-Atlantic data transfer after several months in limbo. The bad news is in the remaining uncertainties.

The recent U.S. and European handshake deal on a new framework for trans-Atlantic data transfer, dubbed the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield, has given global businesses renewed optimism that their operations will not be hampered by complex legal maneuvering. As with the defunct Safe Harbor framework before it, once Privacy Shield is approved by the Article 29 Working Party, businesses that become certified as meeting the agreement’s privacy and data security provisions will have a streamlined administrative path for cross-border data flows.

With Privacy Shield, the good news is that we will finally have a clear direction for continuing trans-Atlantic data transfer after spending several months in limbo. That bad news is in the remaining uncertainties.

One of the biggest areas of ambiguity with Privacy Shield lies with the potential enforcement of regulations or fines across the 28 member countries in the EU – especially now that we’ve passed a critical milestone which put a hold on penalties for organizations still following the outdated Safe Harbor rules. A small handful of U.S. companies with ample resources, like Microsoft and Facebook, have European data centers for keeping the collection of information on EU citizens within the Union’s boundaries.

Keeping data operations thus contained goes a long way toward ensuring compliance with European privacy law with or without a new framework. However, the vast majority of businesses that do overseas business, whether large or small, aren’t so equipped. For them (and their legal teams), waiting for a signal from the EU has been a test of patience, trying to read the regulatory tea leaves and determine how to make the decisions that would allow them to continue doing business without crossing ambiguous lines in shifting regulatory sands.

Yet, even as the U.S. business community breathed a collective sigh of relief at word of an agreement, questions remain as to what—if any—form EU-U.S. Privacy Shield will take in its final implementation. Many EU member states remain suspicious of U.S. intelligence agencies and of American companies’ ability to resist requests for access to their data for national security purposes. The level of trust between the U.S. and EU in the post-Edward Snowden era remains low, even with subsequent revelations of aggressive domestic surveillance programs among European countries.

While it’s a good bet Privacy Shield will be ratified by the Article 29 Working Party, if your organization does business internationally, it should take steps to ensure it can continue to transfer data from the EU and do so in a way that is in compliance with regulation and best practices. That begins with a thorough review of current processes, including the legal agreements, tools and policies used to effect such operations.

The attention paid to Privacy Shield underscores the value of data in today’s economy. Whether that data is personal information or intellectual property, the information we collect, create, share, and store is vital to the success of any organization and, as such, should be handled and protected with care.

As for the lessons of Safe Harbor and Privacy Shield, they are just the beginning. Expect more of the same both at home and abroad as the importance of data—and its protection and management—becomes better understood by everyone.

Related Content:

Interop 2016 Las VegasFind out more about security threats at Interop 2016, May 2-6, at the Mandalay Bay Convention Center, Las Vegas. Register today and receive an early bird discount of $200.

James Bindseil is President and Chief Executive Officer of Globalscape, a leading developer of secure information exchange solutions. He has more than 20 years of experience in the technology industry, including senior leadership roles at Fujitsu, Symantec, and Axent ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
7 Old IT Things Every New InfoSec Pro Should Know
Joan Goodchild, Staff Editor,  4/20/2021
News
Cloud-Native Businesses Struggle With Security
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  5/6/2021
Commentary
Defending Against Web Scraping Attacks
Rob Simon, Principal Security Consultant at TrustedSec,  5/7/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-16632
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-15
A XSS Vulnerability in /uploads/dede/action_search.php in DedeCMS V5.7 SP2 allows an authenticated user to execute remote arbitrary code via the keyword parameter.
CVE-2021-32073
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-15
DedeCMS V5.7 SP2 contains a CSRF vulnerability that allows a remote attacker to send a malicious request to to the web manager allowing remote code execution.
CVE-2021-33033
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-14
The Linux kernel before 5.11.14 has a use-after-free in cipso_v4_genopt in net/ipv4/cipso_ipv4.c because the CIPSO and CALIPSO refcounting for the DOI definitions is mishandled, aka CID-ad5d07f4a9cd. This leads to writing an arbitrary value.
CVE-2021-33034
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-14
In the Linux kernel before 5.12.4, net/bluetooth/hci_event.c has a use-after-free when destroying an hci_chan, aka CID-5c4c8c954409. This leads to writing an arbitrary value.
CVE-2019-25044
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-14
The block subsystem in the Linux kernel before 5.2 has a use-after-free that can lead to arbitrary code execution in the kernel context and privilege escalation, aka CID-c3e2219216c9. This is related to blk_mq_free_rqs and blk_cleanup_queue.