Cloud

7/18/2017
03:26 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
Google+
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Dow Jones Data Leak Results from an AWS Configuration Error

Security pros expect to see more incidents like the Dow Jones leak, which exposed customers' personal information following a public cloud configuration error.

A data leak at Dow Jones & Co. exposed the personal information of millions of customers after a public cloud configuration error. This marks the fifth major public cloud leak in the past several months after similar incidents affected Verizon, the WWE, US voter records, and Scottrade.

This mistake compromised millions of customers' names, account information, physical and email addresses, and last four digits of credit card numbers. It also affected 1.6 million entries in Dow Jones Risk and Compliance, a collection of databases used by financial companies for compliance with anti-money laundering regulations.

All of this information was left exposed in an Amazon Web Services S3 bucket, which had its permission settings configured to let any AWS Authenticated User download data using the bucket's URL. Amazon defines "authenticated user" as anyone who has a free AWS account, meaning the data was available to more than one million users.

Chris Vickery, director of cyber risk research at Upguard, discovered the information was accessible to AWS authenticated users under the subdomain "dj-skynet" on May 30, 2017. Upguard informed Dow Jones of the unprotected repository, which was secured on June 6.

Dow Jones has confirmed 2.2 million people were exposed. Based on the repository's size and composition, Upguard "conservatively estimates" up to four million people could have been affected, though it states duplicated subscriptions may account for some of the difference.

The publisher has "no reason to believe" any of the data was stolen, a spokesperson reported to the WSJ. Exposed information did not include full credit card numbers or login information that could pose a "significant risk" to customers or require notification, he said.

Security experts anticipate an increase in these types of leaks as more businesses move their data to the cloud and adopt different cloud services. Upguard calls this "an all-too-common" story that unnecessarily leaves customer data vulnerable to exploitation. Even if no threat actors accessed Dow Jones' data, it's clear how they could have done so.

"It's a problem we've seen since these public cloud providers began offering their services to organizations, but has become infinitely more complex now that many organizations operate multi-cloud environments of their own," says Dome9 CEO Zohar Alon.

While he expects Amazon will add more controls for companies to understand their exposure, businesses are responsible for knowing how their information is available online. Businesses moving data to the cloud will need to invest in tools to monitor its accessibility.

"We are seeing a lot of the 'I can do it myself' mentality when talking to large enterprises," Alon says. Many organizations try to develop their own security teams internally when they lack the expertise to secure their information from increasingly sophisticated threat actors.

"As more and more enterprises adopt public cloud, they need to be aware that the difference between having their information private, versus publicly exposed, is simply the click of a button," says Jason Lango, CTO of Bracket Computing.

After all, he adds, the public cloud is designed for sharing. Many core Amazon services are built to put more information on the Internet. The Dow Jones leak could have been the simple mistake of someone who misunderstood authenticated users, but the problem is actually a lot bigger than people are giving it credit for.

"The problem of complexity, enabling security around cloud infrastructure goes beyond S3 into other data assets stored in the cloud," Lango says. Things like application images, or data volume snapshots saved for backup purposes, can be shared easily among Amazon accounts.

He advises security admins to ensure S3 controls are set appropriately and encrypt all enterprise data in the public cloud. The only way to maintain control over information is by encrypting it, he says, and only allowing decryption under very specific circumstances.

IT teams should also be thinking about how to separate responsibilities between people who set security policies and those who deploy workloads or administer cloud applications. The goal should be to maximize public cloud usage while maintaining control over their assets, he notes.

"This type of exposure is going to happen more and more," says Lango. "I believe we're only seeing the tip of the iceberg … enterprise adoption of public cloud is still in its early stages."

Black Hat USA returns to the fabulous Mandalay Bay in Las Vegas, Nevada, July 22-27, 2017. Click for information on the conference schedule and to register.

 

Related Content:

Kelly Sheridan is the Staff Editor at Dark Reading, where she focuses on cybersecurity news and analysis. She is a business technology journalist who previously reported for InformationWeek, where she covered Microsoft, and Insurance & Technology, where she covered financial ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
12 Free, Ready-to-Use Security Tools
Steve Zurier, Freelance Writer,  10/12/2018
Most IT Security Pros Want to Change Jobs
Dark Reading Staff 10/12/2018
6 Security Trends for 2018/2019
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  10/15/2018
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Flash Poll
The Risk Management Struggle
The Risk Management Struggle
The majority of organizations are struggling to implement a risk-based approach to security even though risk reduction has become the primary metric for measuring the effectiveness of enterprise security strategies. Read the report and get more details today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-10839
PUBLISHED: 2018-10-16
Qemu emulator <= 3.0.0 built with the NE2000 NIC emulation support is vulnerable to an integer overflow, which could lead to buffer overflow issue. It could occur when receiving packets over the network. A user inside guest could use this flaw to crash the Qemu process resulting in DoS.
CVE-2018-13399
PUBLISHED: 2018-10-16
The Microsoft Windows Installer for Atlassian Fisheye and Crucible before version 4.6.1 allows local attackers to escalate privileges because of weak permissions on the installation directory.
CVE-2018-18381
PUBLISHED: 2018-10-16
Z-BlogPHP 1.5.2.1935 (Zero) has a stored XSS Vulnerability in zb_system/function/c_system_admin.php via the Content-Type header during the uploading of image attachments.
CVE-2018-18382
PUBLISHED: 2018-10-16
Advanced HRM 1.6 allows Remote Code Execution via PHP code in a .php file to the user/update-user-avatar URI, which can be accessed through an "Update Profile" "Change Picture" (aka user/edit-profile) action.
CVE-2018-18374
PUBLISHED: 2018-10-16
XSS exists in the MetInfo 6.1.2 admin/index.php page via the anyid parameter.