Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Cloud

3/7/2019
02:30 PM
Torsten George
Torsten George
Commentary
Connect Directly
LinkedIn
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail vvv
50%
50%

Debunking 5 Myths About Zero Trust Security

Rather than "trust but verify," a zero trust model assumes that attackers will inevitably get in - if they aren't already. However, several misconceptions are impeding its adoption.

For years, the popular security maxim was "trust but verify." However, this mindset is no longer sufficient in today's borderless, global, mobile, cloud-based threatscape.

According to Gartner, organizations are expected to spend $137 billion in IT security and risk management in 2019, yet 66% of all companies experienced security breaches last year. You'd think with that much money invested in security, we'd be several steps ahead of the bad guys. But hardly a week goes by without news of the latest high-profile cyberattack.

Zero trust security is an antidote for outdated security strategies because it demands that organizations never trust and always verify. Every business must recognize that attackers exist inside and outside the network — and that perimeter-based security no longer provides protection against identity-based and credential-based intrusion, which are today's leading attack vectors. The solution now is to remove trust entirely from the equation by granting just enough privilege at just the right time.

However, several misconceptions are impeding zero trust adoption. Let's take a look at the top five and set the record straight.

Myth 1: The Path to Zero Trust Security Starts with Data Integrity
Rest assured, encrypting sensitive data and assuring its integrity remains a best practice. No one denies that. But how does that limit attackers from exfiltrating data if they've already secured privileged access, including to decryption keys?

Forrester estimates that 80% of data breaches are caused by misuse of privileged credentials. Privileged credentials provide greater scope for stealing data than individual accounts do, so it only takes one compromised credential to impact millions of people and cause a massive amount of damage. It's not surprising that Gartner recommends putting privileged access management (PAM) at the top of any list of security projects.

Until organizations start implementing identity-centric security measures, account compromise attacks will continue to provide a perfect camouflage for data breaches. Thus, the path to zero trust should always start with identity.

Myth 2: Zero Trust Is Only for Large Organizations
Google was one of the first companies to adopt the zero trust model. As a result, many people still think it is only for the largest organizations. But the reality is, no one is safe from a cyberattack. In fact, 61% of all data breaches affected small businesses, according to the "2018 Verizon Data Breach Investigations Report."

The good news is that zero trust security won't break the bank. Your company's size or budget should not be a deterrent because even the smallest business can get started with zero trust by taking a cost-effective, step-by-step approach. For example, many organizations can significantly harden their security posture with low-hanging fruit like a password vault or multifactor authentication. Spending a couple hundred dollars per system each year could be well worth it to avoid potential millions in fines, penalties, or brand damage.

Myth 3: I Need to Rip and Replace My Entire Network Security Environment
It's true that when Google first established its zero trust security architecture, it decided to rebuild its entire security network from the ground up. But this is not the case for most organizations.

Zero trust can simply involve an augmentation of security controls that already exist within your environment. For instance, you can start by deploying an "MFA everywhere" solution, which is not overly complex and can deliver tremendous value. This first step can go a long way toward establishing identity insurance and dramatically reducing your attack surface, putting your organization firmly on a path to zero trust.

Myth 4: Zero Trust Is Limited to On-Site Deployment
Many organizations think zero trust can only work on-premises and can't be applied to the public cloud. This becomes a concern when sensitive data resides outside the traditional network perimeter.

The fact of the matter is, zero trust can easily be extended to cloud environments, and it is increasingly important to do so as organizations across a broad range of industries move to hybrid, multicloud environments. Further, zero trust not only covers infrastructure, databases, and network devices, but it is extended to other attack surfaces that are increasingly becoming strategic requirements of modern organizations, including big data, DevOps, containers and more.

Myth 5: Zero Trust's Only Benefit Is It Will Minimize My Exposure to Risk
Risk mitigation is clearly a major benefit of zero trust, but it's definitely not the only one.

Forrester recently concluded that zero trust can reduce an organization's risk exposure by 37% or more. But it also found that organizations deploying zero trust can reduce security costs by 31% and realize millions of dollars in savings in their overall IT security budgets.

Zero trust can also lead to greater business confidence. The Forrester study found that organizations deploying zero trust are 66% more confident in adopting mobile work models and 44% more confident in securing DevOps environments. As a result, they are able to accelerate new business models and introduce new customer experiences with a greater sense of assurance and success.

The bottom line is that today's security is not secure. Rather than "trust but verify," a zero trust model assumes that attackers will inevitably get in — if they aren't already. With zero trust, you can minimize the attack surface, improve auditing and compliance visibility, and reduce complexity and cost.

Zero trust is truly the definitive approach to security for the modern hybrid enterprise. Remember: Never trust. Always verify. Enforce least privilege.

That's no myth.

Related Content:

 

 

Join Dark Reading LIVE for two cybersecurity summits at Interop 2019. Learn from the industry's most knowledgeable IT security experts. Check out the Interop agenda here.

Torsten George is a cybersecurity evangelist at Centrify. He also serves as strategic advisory board member at vulnerability risk management software vendor NopSec. He has more than 20 years of global information security experience and is a frequent speaker on ... View Full Bio
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Mobile Banking Malware Up 50% in First Half of 2019
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/17/2020
Active Directory Needs an Update: Here's Why
Raz Rafaeli, CEO and Co-Founder at Secret Double Octopus,  1/16/2020
New Attack Campaigns Suggest Emotet Threat Is Far From Over
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  1/16/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
The Year in Security: 2019
This Tech Digest provides a wrap up and overview of the year's top cybersecurity news stories. It was a year of new twists on old threats, with fears of another WannaCry-type worm and of a possible botnet army of Wi-Fi routers. But 2019 also underscored the risk of firmware and trusted security tools harboring dangerous holes that cybercriminals and nation-state hackers could readily abuse. Read more.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Organizations have invested in a sweeping array of security technologies to address challenges associated with the growing number of cybersecurity attacks. However, the complexity involved in managing these technologies is emerging as a major problem. Read this report to find out what your peers biggest security challenges are and the technologies they are using to address them.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-20391
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-22
An invalid memory access flaw is present in libyang before v1.0-r3 in the function resolve_feature_value() when an if-feature statement is used inside a bit. Applications that use libyang to parse untrusted input yang files may crash.
CVE-2019-20392
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-22
An invalid memory access flaw is present in libyang before v1.0-r1 in the function resolve_feature_value() when an if-feature statement is used inside a list key node, and the feature used is not defined. Applications that use libyang to parse untrusted input yang files may crash.
CVE-2019-20393
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-22
A double-free is present in libyang before v1.0-r1 in the function yyparse() when an empty description is used. Applications that use libyang to parse untrusted input yang files may be vulnerable to this flaw, which would cause a crash or potentially code execution.
CVE-2019-20394
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-22
A double-free is present in libyang before v1.0-r3 in the function yyparse() when a type statement in used in a notification statement. Applications that use libyang to parse untrusted input yang files may be vulnerable to this flaw, which would cause a crash or potentially code execution.
CVE-2019-20395
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-22
A stack consumption issue is present in libyang before v1.0-r1 due to the self-referential union type containing leafrefs. Applications that use libyang to parse untrusted input yang files may crash.