Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Cloud

11/21/2014
02:05 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Cloud Security By The Numbers

Quantifying the perceptions around cloud security practices.
Previous
1 of 10
Next

As IT executives and business leaders finally get their arms around analyses of the business opportunities versus the security risks of cloud adoption, the industry is increasingly quantifying the friction between the two. We've put together some numbers to show perception over some of the hot-button issues, as well as current progress toward smoothing the way for secure cloud transformations.

 

Ericka Chickowski specializes in coverage of information technology and business innovation. She has focused on information security for the better part of a decade and regularly writes about the security industry as a contributor to Dark Reading. 
View Full Bio

Previous
1 of 10
Next
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
DmitriS346
50%
50%
DmitriS346,
User Rank: Apprentice
11/27/2014 | 12:52:41 AM
Re: Is the cloud really less secure?
There are different clouds out there. Not sure which cloud is discussed here.

"They also manage more uniform environments, leaving them with less detail to track."

and that means a few things:

1) Uniform means attack on one part of infrastructure that is successfull, is sucessfull attack on all part of it, since it can be reused.

2) Less options for security. That's right. If I am full scale paranoid, I can't use all means available for me to protect my users, including from themselves.



3) Restoration of data.

Oh yeah, this is a sweet one. If only one customer, specifically me has been badly affected, due to non cloud issues, there is not much I can do to restore data. I am at will of cloud provider here And will says NO. As it's not economically feaseble to restore file or two.

I have refused restoring those files myself. Just for record, I worked for cloud provider myself. For two of them actually. I was sacked from last one. Though it's entirely different story.

And remember, policy of any company is not trueth, but profit. Especially when any kind of outsourcing is involved. I know that, as I worked for a few.

To add to minuses of cloud. They will hapilly assist you to migrate to them, but not from them. And it may be hughe pain in the butt later.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
11/24/2014 | 8:17:28 PM
Re: Is the cloud really less secure?
I see your point. We may be better of being on Microsoft Azure platform than Target's POS system. Clots solution tend to have standard level of security otherwise they could not sell the service to the public.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
11/24/2014 | 8:15:10 PM
Re: Is the cloud really less secure?
I mainly agree. All the security concerns will go away if we just encrypt data at rest.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
11/24/2014 | 8:05:01 PM
Cloud is more secure
I think I am in one of these slides, I tend to think cloud is more secure when I start thinking security measures, or lack of it, that lots of SME are using. Cloud provides a certain level of security by default.
ODA155
50%
50%
ODA155,
User Rank: Ninja
11/24/2014 | 11:00:26 AM
Re: Is the cloud really less secure?
@Marilyn Cohodas, "But the issues of  security of the data remains the same regardless of who owns the servers and where they are located.". That is absolutley correct, but from every security professional that I know, when this topic comes up for discussion, inside thier companies, it's never about security, it's about providing some type of functionality or solution that does not already exist internally or treating that "cloud" as an appendage to their own networks because it's faster and cheaper than building, managing and maintaining your own.

My company for example, would rather put a service in the cloud\outsource (that's what it really is, rebranded outsourcing) rather than hire a professional inhouse to do exactly what we need, you settle for what the provider can\will offer.  If we don't already have someone who has the skills the rule is send it to the cloud, and that is about $$$, not security, I wish it were. And what happens when you have people so overloaded with responsibilities that they really shouldn't mix with outher responsibilities... If a company were as willing to invest in securing their internal network as they are in trying to get everything into a cloud, then you wouldn't see so many of these data breaches, I know this is a streach, but I would be surprised if some companies haven't used Target, Home Depot and others as reasoning to move to a cloud for what ever it is the need.
Marilyn Cohodas
50%
50%
Marilyn Cohodas,
User Rank: Strategist
11/24/2014 | 10:22:32 AM
Re: Is the cloud really less secure?
@ODA155, you make an interesting point about "the cloud" being "just another infrastructure that holds data." The metaphor gives the public the sense that "cloud" is somehow vastly different than  a bricks and mortar DC. And perhaps it is, for  most companies outside of Netflix, Google, Apple, and FB etc, in terms of scale. But the issues of  security of the data remains the same regardless of who owns the servers and where they are located.  
ODA155
50%
50%
ODA155,
User Rank: Ninja
11/23/2014 | 11:41:48 PM
Re: Is the cloud really less secure?
Does it really matter... "the cloud" is just another infrastructure that holds data for other people that you HOPE has been designed properly w\security in mind. And just because you think you've transfered the risk on to the cloud provider, guess what, it's still your data or your customers data and you're still responsible for it. Cloud services need services provided the same as Target and Home Depot, maybe not the same services, but services none the less. Lastley, you can call it what you want or you can do as Apple did and blame the customer, but Apples cloud was breached and it will happen again.
Charlie Babcock
50%
50%
Charlie Babcock,
User Rank: Ninja
11/21/2014 | 8:12:05 PM
Is the cloud really less secure?
I'm looking for the 51% majority that believes sending data to the cloud increases the risk of a breach to flip the other way. Soon a narrow majority will say the cloud is safer than their own premises. The Target breach and other recent breaches have been enterprise system intrusions, not cloud breaches. And a large successful cloud operation like Microsoft, SoftLayer or Amazon can devote more resources to security than most enterprises can. They also manage more uniform environments, leaving them with less detail to track.
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 8/3/2020
'BootHole' Vulnerability Exposes Secure Boot Devices to Attack
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  7/29/2020
Average Cost of a Data Breach: $3.86 Million
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  7/29/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal, a Dark Reading Perspective
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
This report describes some of the latest attacks and threats emanating from the Internet, as well as advice and tips on how your organization can mitigate those threats before they affect your business. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2017-18112
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-05
Affected versions of Atlassian Fisheye allow remote attackers to view the HTTP password of a repository via an Information Disclosure vulnerability in the logging feature. The affected versions are before version 4.8.3.
CVE-2020-15109
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-04
In solidus before versions 2.8.6, 2.9.6, and 2.10.2, there is an bility to change order address without triggering address validations. This vulnerability allows a malicious customer to craft request data with parameters that allow changing the address of the current order without changing the shipm...
CVE-2020-16847
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-04
Extreme Analytics in Extreme Management Center before 8.5.0.169 allows unauthenticated reflected XSS via a parameter in a GET request, aka CFD-4887.
CVE-2020-15135
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-04
save-server (npm package) before version 1.05 is affected by a CSRF vulnerability, as there is no CSRF mitigation (Tokens etc.). The fix introduced in version version 1.05 unintentionally breaks uploading so version v1.0.7 is the fixed version. This is patched by implementing Double submit. The CSRF...
CVE-2020-13522
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-04
An exploitable arbitrary file delete vulnerability exists in SoftPerfect RAM Disk 4.1 spvve.sys driver. A specially crafted I/O request packet (IRP) can allow an unprivileged user to delete any file on the filesystem. An attacker can send a malicious IRP to trigger this vulnerability.