Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Cloud

11/17/2016
03:36 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
Google+
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Cloud-driven IT Decentralization Increases Security Risk

IT management has become increasingly decentralized, which many businesses think is causing more harm than good - especially for security, a new study says.

IT management has become increasingly decentralized in the last three years, and businesses are struggling to address it. Many believe tech departments aren't ready to face this trend, which they believe will increase enterprise security risk.

These findings come from new cloud research on IT management, commissioned by VMWare and conducted by Vanson Bourne. Researchers expanded on a previous VMWare-sponsored study by The Economist Intelligence Unit, which focused on decentralization of enterprise tech.

As part of the Vanson Bourne study, researchers polled 3,300 people in August and September 2016. Respondents represented 20 industries and came from 20 countries across the Americas (24%), Asia-Pacific (39%), and EMEA (36%). 

Half of respondents were decision makers in their organization's IT department, said Chloe Byrne, project manager at Vanson Bourne. The other half are "business decision makers" from departments including business direction and strategy, engineering, finance, and operations.

The majority (69%) of respondents agree that IT management has continued to decentralize in the past three years, but most don't view this as a positive change. Nearly as many (65%) want IT to be more centralized. 

The decentralization trend is being driven by cloud computing, said Byrne. The cloud enables lines of business to purchase their own cloud IT more easily. Many are buying "IT as a service" to drive innovation.

This has both positive and negative effects on organizations. Respondents say decentralization is doing more harm than good, especially with respect to security.

Fifty-seven percent agree it has led to purchasing non-secure solutions, and 60% say it has resulted in apps being developed outside of corporate or government regulations. More than half (56%) say it has led to a lack of regulatory compliance for data protection. 

"[Decentralization] causes a lack of awareness of overall company-wide spend on IT, and even means that there will be duplication of cost where different departments could be purchasing the same thing," Byrne explained.

More than half (58%) of respondents claim decentralization has created a lack of clear ownership and responsibility for IT. Financially, it's causing an average increase of 5.7% on tech spending across organizations.

More than 60% of respondents claim decentralization is creating a duplication of IT spending across the organization, and 57% say it's driving a lack of awareness regarding how much money is spent on IT throughout the business.

"It can also make the IT department's job more challenging, increasing the stress on IT personnel and resources as they will still need to ensure security and compliance for their organization's data, not necessarily knowing where it is," said Byrne.

However, decentralization could also present new opportunities to the enterprise, she noted. It enables organizations to innovate more quickly, accelerate the development of new products and services, increase responsiveness to market changes, and drive employee satisfaction.

Related Content:

 

Kelly Sheridan is the Staff Editor at Dark Reading, where she focuses on cybersecurity news and analysis. She is a business technology journalist who previously reported for InformationWeek, where she covered Microsoft, and Insurance & Technology, where she covered financial ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
7 Tips for Infosec Pros Considering A Lateral Career Move
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/21/2020
For Mismanaged SOCs, The Price Is Not Right
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/22/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment:   It's a PEN test of our cloud security.
Current Issue
IT 2020: A Look Ahead
Are you ready for the critical changes that will occur in 2020? We've compiled editor insights from the best of our network (Dark Reading, Data Center Knowledge, InformationWeek, ITPro Today and Network Computing) to deliver to you a look at the trends, technologies, and threats that are emerging in the coming year. Download it today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Organizations have invested in a sweeping array of security technologies to address challenges associated with the growing number of cybersecurity attacks. However, the complexity involved in managing these technologies is emerging as a major problem. Read this report to find out what your peers biggest security challenges are and the technologies they are using to address them.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-5226
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-24
Cross-site scripting in SimpleSAMLphp before version 1.18.4. The www/erroreport.php script allows error reports to be submitted and sent to the system administrator. Starting with SimpleSAMLphp 1.18.0, a new SimpleSAML\Utils\EMail class was introduced to handle sending emails, implemented as a wrapp...
CVE-2019-1517
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-24
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2019. Notes: none.
CVE-2019-1518
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-24
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2019. Notes: none.
CVE-2019-1519
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-24
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2019. Notes: none.
CVE-2019-1520
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-24
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2019. Notes: none.