Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Cloud

5/2/2016
08:11 AM
Sean Martin
Sean Martin
Slideshows
Connect Directly
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
0%
100%

8 Microsoft Office 365 Security Tips To Reduce Data Loss

Even with a slew of new security tools and compliance guidance, there are still things you can do to protect this critical business system.
Previous
1 of 9
Next

More than four in ten organizations are in the process of implementing Office 365 or are already using it. It thus comes as no surprise that revenue for Microsoft’s flagship cloud-based email and collaboration solution has increased nearly 70% year-over-year in Q2 2016 compared to 2015. The solution appears to continue to be growing in popularity—with signs of further traction in the large enterprises.

Yet, even with a slew of new security tools and security and compliance guidance offered by the Redmond-based software giant, there are still things that should be done to protect this critical business system. A recent announcement of an authentication bypass should be enough to cause some pause on the topic of Office 365 security.

Risk can come in many shapes and forms; compromises can come from many methods and angles. Some we can control -- some we cannot. Why leave anything to chance? We have the power to ensure that our reputation does not get tainted as a result of something we could have stopped or at least slowed down.

Organizations shouldn’t shy away from this increasingly popular service; rather, they should just take the time to understand the requirements to secure the environment and protect the users and their data from malicious activity, loss and misuse. To this end, there are a number of baseline security actions to take in Office 365 to help mitigate some of these risks. This slideshow is geared toward highlighting a handful of those actions.

Note: The team at imsmartin thanks BCC Risk Advisory/Edgescan, Centrify, DatumSec and Netskope for their contributions that led to this slide collection.

 

Sean Martin is an information security veteran of nearly 25 years and a four-term CISSP with articles published globally covering security management, cloud computing, enterprise mobility, governance, risk, and compliance—with a focus on specialized industries such as ... View Full Bio

Previous
1 of 9
Next
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 8/14/2020
Lock-Pickers Face an Uncertain Future Online
Seth Rosenblatt, Contributing Writer,  8/10/2020
Hacking It as a CISO: Advice for Security Leadership
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  8/10/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
7 New Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities That Could Put Your Enterprise at Risk
In this Dark Reading Tech Digest, we look at the ways security researchers and ethical hackers find critical vulnerabilities and offer insights into how you can fix them before attackers can exploit them.
Flash Poll
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
This special report takes a look at how enterprises are using threat intelligence, as well as emerging best practices for integrating threat intel into security operations and incident response. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-17475
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
Lack of authentication in the network relays used in MEGVII Koala 2.9.1-c3s allows attackers to grant physical access to anyone by sending packet data to UDP port 5000.
CVE-2020-0255
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2020-10751. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2020-10751. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2020-10751 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidenta...
CVE-2020-14353
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-18270. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2017-18270. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-18270 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidenta...
CVE-2020-17464
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none.
CVE-2020-17473
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
Lack of mutual authentication in ZKTeco FaceDepot 7B 1.0.213 and ZKBiosecurity Server 1.0.0_20190723 allows an attacker to obtain a long-lasting token by impersonating the server.