Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Cloud

5/2/2016
08:11 AM
Sean Martin
Sean Martin
Slideshows
Connect Directly
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
0%
100%

8 Microsoft Office 365 Security Tips To Reduce Data Loss

Even with a slew of new security tools and compliance guidance, there are still things you can do to protect this critical business system.
Previous
1 of 9
Next

Image Source: imsmartin

Image Source: imsmartin

More than four in ten organizations are in the process of implementing Office 365 or are already using it. It thus comes as no surprise that revenue for Microsoft’s flagship cloud-based email and collaboration solution has increased nearly 70% year-over-year in Q2 2016 compared to 2015. The solution appears to continue to be growing in popularity—with signs of further traction in the large enterprises.

Yet, even with a slew of new security tools and security and compliance guidance offered by the Redmond-based software giant, there are still things that should be done to protect this critical business system. A recent announcement of an authentication bypass should be enough to cause some pause on the topic of Office 365 security.

Risk can come in many shapes and forms; compromises can come from many methods and angles. Some we can control -- some we cannot. Why leave anything to chance? We have the power to ensure that our reputation does not get tainted as a result of something we could have stopped or at least slowed down.

Organizations shouldn’t shy away from this increasingly popular service; rather, they should just take the time to understand the requirements to secure the environment and protect the users and their data from malicious activity, loss and misuse. To this end, there are a number of baseline security actions to take in Office 365 to help mitigate some of these risks. This slideshow is geared toward highlighting a handful of those actions.

Note: The team at imsmartin thanks BCC Risk Advisory/Edgescan, Centrify, DatumSec and Netskope for their contributions that led to this slide collection.

 

Sean Martin is an information security veteran of nearly 25 years and a four-term CISSP with articles published globally covering security management, cloud computing, enterprise mobility, governance, risk, and compliance—with a focus on specialized industries such as ... View Full Bio

Previous
1 of 9
Next
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
MoviePass Leaves Credit Card Numbers, Personal Data Exposed Online
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  8/21/2019
New FISMA Report Shows Progress, Gaps in Federal Cybersecurity
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  8/21/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
7 Threats & Disruptive Forces Changing the Face of Cybersecurity
This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at the biggest emerging threats and disruptive forces that are changing the face of cybersecurity today.
Flash Poll
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
Your enterprise's cyber risk may depend upon the relationship between the IT team and the security team. Heres some insight on what's working and what isn't in the data center.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-13139
PUBLISHED: 2019-08-22
In Docker before 18.09.4, an attacker who is capable of supplying or manipulating the build path for the "docker build" command would be able to gain command execution. An issue exists in the way "docker build" processes remote git URLs, and results in command injection into the ...
CVE-2019-15325
PUBLISHED: 2019-08-22
In GalliumOS 3.0, CONFIG_SECURITY_YAMA is disabled but /etc/sysctl.d/10-ptrace.conf tries to set /proc/sys/kernel/yama/ptrace_scope to 1, which might increase risk because of the appearance that a protection mechanism is present when actually it is not.
CVE-2019-15326
PUBLISHED: 2019-08-22
The import-users-from-csv-with-meta plugin before 1.14.2.1 for WordPress has directory traversal.
CVE-2019-15327
PUBLISHED: 2019-08-22
The import-users-from-csv-with-meta plugin before 1.14.1.3 for WordPress has XSS via imported data.
CVE-2019-15328
PUBLISHED: 2019-08-22
The import-users-from-csv-with-meta plugin before 1.14.0.3 for WordPress has XSS.