Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Cloud

5/20/2019
10:00 AM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
100%
0%

7 Signs of the Rising Threat of Magecart Attacks in 2019

Magecart attacks continue to grow in momentum. Here are the stats and stories that show what's behind the mayhem.
Previous
1 of 8
Next

Image Source: Adobe Stock (M.a.u.)

Image Source: Adobe Stock (M.a.u.)

Popping up in various permutations for the better part of four years now, the online payment skimming operations run by Magecart fraudsters continue to intensify in 2019. Targeting vulnerable content management systems used for running payment on e-commerce sites, Magecart once was used to describe the group running these attacks. But as its number widened to as many as 12 major identifiable criminal syndicates, the Magecart moniker is just as likely to refer to the common techniques they use.

Magecart attacks work on the same principles that a POS skimmer would at a physical cash register. The bad guys find a way to quietly insert scripts onto compromised servers running payment systems to steal customer data as it's entered by customers on an e-commerce site, sending that data silently to the attackers without interrupting the payment mechanism.

"With the number of criminal groups operating these skimming campaigns, it's likely one of the biggest threats facing e-commerce right now," said Yonathan Klijnsma, threat researcher for RiskIQ, late last year.

Security experts like Bob Rudis, chief data scientist at Rapid7, believe this has to do with the work done to reduce POS fraud through the use of chip-based credit cards.

"Attackers still want payment card data, since they have their own playbooks full of successful steps they can take to turn digits into dollars,” Rudis recently wrote. "Rather than abandon all this coin, they've refocused their efforts to the server side."

Last year we saw anecdotal evidence of this with high-profile Magecart attacks against the likes of British Airways, Ticketmaster, and NewEgg. The hits keep coming, and the signs are mounting that Magecart is gaining even more momentum this year.

 

Ericka Chickowski specializes in coverage of information technology and business innovation. She has focused on information security for the better part of a decade and regularly writes about the security industry as a contributor to Dark Reading.  View Full Bio

Previous
1 of 8
Next
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Sodinokibi Ransomware: Where Attackers' Money Goes
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  10/15/2019
Data Privacy Protections for the Most Vulnerable -- Children
Dimitri Sirota, Founder & CEO of BigID,  10/17/2019
7 SMB Security Tips That Will Keep Your Company Safe
Steve Zurier, Contributing Writer,  10/11/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: The old using of sock puppets for Shoulder Surfing technique. 
Current Issue
7 Threats & Disruptive Forces Changing the Face of Cybersecurity
This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at the biggest emerging threats and disruptive forces that are changing the face of cybersecurity today.
Flash Poll
2019 Online Malware and Threats
2019 Online Malware and Threats
As cyberattacks become more frequent and more sophisticated, enterprise security teams are under unprecedented pressure to respond. Is your organization ready?
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-17513
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-18
An issue was discovered in Ratpack before 1.7.5. Due to a misuse of the Netty library class DefaultHttpHeaders, there is no validation that headers lack HTTP control characters. Thus, if untrusted data is used to construct HTTP headers with Ratpack, HTTP Response Splitting can occur.
CVE-2019-8216
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-17
Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions , 2019.012.20040 and earlier, 2017.011.30148 and earlier, 2017.011.30148 and earlier, 2015.006.30503 and earlier, and 2015.006.30503 and earlier have an out-of-bounds read vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to information disclosure .
CVE-2019-8217
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-17
Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions , 2019.012.20040 and earlier, 2017.011.30148 and earlier, 2017.011.30148 and earlier, 2015.006.30503 and earlier, and 2015.006.30503 and earlier have an use after free vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution .
CVE-2019-8218
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-17
Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions , 2019.012.20040 and earlier, 2017.011.30148 and earlier, 2017.011.30148 and earlier, 2015.006.30503 and earlier, and 2015.006.30503 and earlier have an out-of-bounds read vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to information disclosure .
CVE-2019-8219
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-17
Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions , 2019.012.20040 and earlier, 2017.011.30148 and earlier, 2017.011.30148 and earlier, 2015.006.30503 and earlier, and 2015.006.30503 and earlier have an use after free vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution .