Government Workers Believe Security Is Someone Else's Job

A study from Dtex Systems finds a growing disconnect between government employees and the organizations that they work for over who is ultimately responsible for maintaining good security practices.

Larry Loeb, Blogger, Informationweek

March 16, 2018

3 Min Read

This week, Dtex Systems released a new report, "Uncovering the Gaps: Security Perceptions and Behaviors of Today’s Government Employees," looking at government workers and organizational security.

The study is based on responses from more than 1,000 public and private sector employees who are based in the US and are thought to be some of the most security conscious in government since they have security clearance across either federal, state or local levels.

However, the results demonstrate that there is a widespread expectation among respondents that it is the organization that assumes the responsibility of protecting sensitive work data and devices.

(Source: Geralt via Pixabay)

(Source: Geralt via Pixabay)

The study shows that there is a definite disconnect among respondents when it comes to tying their individual behaviors -- no matter if they are responsible or risky -- to any effects on overall organizational security.

Indeed, only 13% of respondents believe that they have complete personal responsibility for the security of their work devices or information. Another 48% told researchers that they have no responsibility for it at all.

This may be rooted in a strong belief in their organization's ability to serve as a data protector. But one in three -- 29% -- of the employees believe that they are more likely to be struck by lightning than have their work data compromised.

In fact, they fear file theft only slightly more than public speaking or alien invasion.

The survey also found that only half -- 52% -- of these employees believe that IT security is everyone's responsibility, or their own personal responsibility. The responsibilities were deflected elsewhere. About 48% believed that the responsibility for IT security fell on someone else in the organization, such as senior leadership (10%), colleagues (8%), or the IT team (30%).

These employees may assume that they are protected against potential consequences of their individual behaviors by organizational security.

The study also showed a gap in respondents engaging in secure practices.

While 90% of government employees perceive using an encrypted file system as an important security practice, only one in three reported using one in the previous two months. Similarly, of the 92% who noted that updating anti-virus software is critical, a only half -- 46% -- actually did so in the same time period.

The fundamentals of network security are being redefined -- don't get left in the dark by a DDoS attack! Join us in Austin from May 14-16 at the fifth annual Big Communications Event. There's still time to register and communications service providers get in free!

Reporting on a co-worker's risky behavior showed the same gap. While 86% of respondents accepted its importance, only 15% had done so in the last 60 days. Indeed, only 43% of those surveyed had ever reported such behavior at any time.

This has great relevance when the idea of an insider threat is considered. About 42% of those surveyed were found to believe that insider threats will pose the greatest risk to the security of their organization. However, only about the same number were able to correctly identify "insider threat" as an IT term -- not very reassuring.

The report shows that government employees remain a significant risk to the organization because of their belief in the security of the organization itself. Education may help to disabuse some of these notions, but they seem pervasive enough to be a continuing security threat.

Related posts:

— Larry Loeb has written for many of the last century's major "dead tree" computer magazines, having been, among other things, a consulting editor for BYTE magazine and senior editor for the launch of WebWeek.

Read more about:

Security Now

About the Author(s)

Larry Loeb

Blogger, Informationweek

Larry Loeb has written for many of the last century's major "dead tree" computer magazines, having been, among other things, a consulting editor for BYTE magazine and senior editor for the launch of WebWeek. He has written a book on the Secure Electronic Transaction Internet protocol. His latest book has the commercially obligatory title of Hack Proofing XML. He's been online since uucp "bang" addressing (where the world existed relative to !decvax), serving as editor of the Macintosh Exchange on BIX and the VARBusiness Exchange. His first Mac had 128 KB of memory, which was a big step up from his first 1130, which had 4 KB, as did his first 1401. You can e-mail him at [email protected].

Keep up with the latest cybersecurity threats, newly discovered vulnerabilities, data breach information, and emerging trends. Delivered daily or weekly right to your email inbox.

You May Also Like

More Insights