Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

7/1/2020
06:20 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Chinese Software Company Aisino Uninstalls GoldenSpy Malware

Follow-up sandbox research confirms Aisino knew about the malware in its tax software, though it's still unclear whether it was culpable.

For those who followed the GoldenSpy story last week from Trustwave, where tax software from China-based Aisino was used as a backdoor to gain access to the networks of foreign firms doing business with a Chinese bank, there's an interesting wrinkle.

While doing a routine follow-up investigation in a sandbox after last week's initial disclosure, Trustwave researchers found that after being discovered, Aisino sent software out with one mission in mind: to delete GoldenSpy with an uninstaller and remove any trace it existed.

Brian Hussey, Trustwave's vice president of cyber threat detection and response, says this new development was significant because it confirmed for the research team that Aisino knew about GoldenSpy and was looking to take it down after the initial news came out last week. However, it's unclear whether Aisino was culpable.

"It's a possibility Aisino sent the uninstaller as a way to clean up the issue after seeing the media exposure," Hussey says. "The secret removal is somewhat suspicious, but perhaps their risk mitigation plan decided this was the best possible method."

The new software deleted registry and log entries, all files and folders – including the GoldenSpy log file – and then finally deleted itself with the uninstaller, Hussey says. Aisino sent the uninstaller in two different waves. First, on June 28 the researchers discovered Aisino sent the uninstaller as an AWX.EXE file, but the variables were in plaintext, so it was easy for antivirus software to pick up. Hussey says they must have realized that antivirus software was picking up their activities, so a day later they sent an uninstaller as a BWXT.EXE file. The advantage there was that they sent the variables with Base64 encoding.

"Trustwave can't verify the reason for this change, but we hypothesize that it may have been to evade antivirus," Hussey says. "People have to realize that even though they were uninstalling the GoldenSpy malware, they still can use the tax software as a platform to launch future attacks. What's to say they couldn't wait three to five months after the news about GoldenSpy dies down and strike at a later point?"

Ron Hayman, chief cloud officer at AVANT, says he didn't think Aisino was responsible for injecting the malware on to its tax software.

"I think they launched the uninstaller to cover their tracks," Hayman says. "This case proves that the human element is still important. The level of sophistication the [attackers] had to make changes so quickly wouldn't have been picked up by most standard network security devices."

Trustwave's Hussey says companies with endpoint detection and response (EDR) capabilities should go back and see if there's any evidence that GoldenSpy existed on their network.

"The malware may not be there anymore, but companies really need to run an investigation," he says. "They need to find out if GoldenSpy was used to steal any data or if it created new users."

Related Content:

 

 
 
 
 
Learn from industry experts in a setting that is conducive to interaction and conversation about how to prepare for that "really bad day" in cybersecurity. Click for more information and to register for this On-Demand event. 
 
Steve Zurier has more than 30 years of journalism and publishing experience, most of the last 24 of which were spent covering networking and security technology. Steve is based in Columbia, Md. View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Pen Testers Who Got Arrested Doing Their Jobs Tell All
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  8/5/2020
Researcher Finds New Office Macro Attacks for MacOS
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  8/7/2020
A Patriotic Solution to the Cybersecurity Skills Shortage
Adam Benson, Senior VP, Vrge Strategies,  8/3/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal, a Dark Reading Perspective
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
This special report takes a look at how enterprises are using threat intelligence, as well as emerging best practices for integrating threat intel into security operations and incident response. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-12777
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-10
A function in Combodo iTop contains a vulnerability of Broken Access Control, which allows unauthorized attacker to inject command and disclose system information.
CVE-2020-12778
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-10
Combodo iTop does not validate inputted parameters, attackers can inject malicious commands and launch XSS attack.
CVE-2020-12779
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-10
Combodo iTop contains a stored Cross-site Scripting vulnerability, which can be attacked by uploading file with malicious script.
CVE-2020-12780
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-10
A security misconfiguration exists in Combodo iTop, which can expose sensitive information.
CVE-2020-12781
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-10
Combodo iTop contains a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability, attackers can execute specific commands via malicious site request forgery.